so where is the news here?.....most know about the U6 rate being closer to the truth at 14.4%..and then this guy has his own magic formula to add another 8.5% unto the numbers...talk about spin doctor....gee whiz...
The formula he's using is the real formula, the one that had been used before the Clinton administration jiggered the formula to cook the books. That's his point. The people who stop looking for jobs after a year because there are no jobs for them to be had don't cease to exist. They still either contribute to or detract from the health of the economy, and are still indicators of it.so where is the news here?.....most know about the U6 rate being closer to the truth at 14.4%..and then this guy has his own magic formula to add another 8.5% unto the numbers...talk about spin doctor....gee whiz...
The formula he's using is the real formula, the one that had been used before the Clinton administration jiggered the formula to cook the books. That's his point. The people who stop looking for jobs after a year because there are no jobs for them to be had don't cease to exist. They still either contribute to or detract from the health of the economy, and are still indicators of it.
That's already been explained, but I'll go over it for you again. U6 only calculates those discouraged workers who have been unable to find work for a year or less, after Clinton made the change to make the numbers look better. The others drop off the radar screen, so-to-speak. When you include them, the true percentage of people who want a job but can't find one is 22.9%.Since he was with the Reagan Admin...he must be doing some Reagonomic math....how he jumped from 14.5% the U6 number...to magically 22.9% with no explanation other then HIS own figuring
That would be 77% working not 87% and is most likely the most accurate of any of the numbers being offered.
Just to clarify this a bit:That's already been explained, but I'll go over it for you again. U6 only calculates those discouraged workers who have been unable to find work for a year or less, after Clinton made the change to make the numbers look better. The others drop off the radar screen, so-to-speak. When you include them, the true percentage of people who want a job but can't find one is 22.9%.
Many thanks to the voters of Ohio, Michigan, Florida and Virginia who foisted this disaster on our nation.
When I said U6 counts those unemployed for a year or less, what I meant was that it doesn't count those discouraged workers out of the labor market for over a year. I just said it backwards. Wasn't saying that's what the chart is for.Just to clarify this a bit:
"U-6 Total unemployed, plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force, plus total employed part time for economic reasons, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force"
The U-6 rate for Nov 2012 (seasonally adjusted) is 14.4%
It is encouraging to watch the Michigan state legislature vote to pass the right-to-work bill. What matters next is can Michigan keep this status as right-to-work? The next gubernatorial(or is it goobernatorial in Michigan?) election in Michigan will surely feature a Democratic candidate promising to overturn right-to-work. If Michigan can retain a GOP state legislature and IF activist judges leave it alone, you might just see real progress.