Reagan home razed for Obama parking lot

muttly

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Too funny.

I would suggest the OP look a little further into this "non-story" and come back and apologize for posting such ignorance. While you're at it, apologize for bringing racism into it as well.

It is truly sad to see people cling to such hatred.

Oh the irony of this post.
 

muttly

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Assuming she raised you it absolutely does. You are a reflection of her.



I respect her as the First Lady. That is all that matters.

Come on now say it. You love George Bush, Rumsfeld, and Cheney. Come on now, say it.
 

muttly

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Then you agree with LDB's comments and the story as well?

Then you agree that you interject race in your previous posts? That is what the irony comment was about. Regarding this topic. There probably would be an outcry if a brief resident of Obama's was going to be bulldozed. My guess is the MSNBC crowd and other race baiters would make a racial issue of it. They make a race issue about everything else.
 

muttly

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
No, I don't love them but I respected their positions while they were in office. Even though they were inept!

Ok same here. Don't hate the current occupants of the w.h. It's just their backward and retarded policies that sux.
 

whistler

Active Expediter
Then you agree that you interject race in your previous posts? That is what the irony comment was about. Regarding this topic. There probably would be an outcry if a brief resident of Obama's was going to be bulldozed. My guess is the MSNBC crowd and other race baiters would make a racial issue of it. They make a race issue about everything else.

I for one was angered when Obama's former home in Indonesia was bulldozed to make way for a fish market...
 

witness23

Veteran Expediter
Then you agree that you interject race in your previous posts? That is what the irony comment was about.

I interjected race? How so?

Regarding this topic. There probably would be an outcry if a brief resident of Obama's was going to be bulldozed.

You seriously think anyone in the Soapbox would even mention a parallel story such as this one? If someone was stupid enough to post a story such as this one, I would be leading the charge in calling that moron out as well.

My guess is the MSNBC crowd and other race baiters would make a racial issue of it. They make a race issue about everything else.

Maybe, maybe not but we're not talking about the "MSNBC crowd" or your so called "race baiters" now are we? The topic at hand is a non-story that the OP linked to at Newsmax in which the usual suspects FoxNews, Fox and Friends and Fox Nation and any other conservative media outlet picked up on the ridiculous story and ran with it. Its a manufactured controversy based on no reality at all and you and others here in the Soapbox are defending it.

Rubes.
 

LDB

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Ah yes, non-stories. Some of you see some of those when they're stories from a certain viewpoint. The point isn't whether it's a non-story, the story of the decade or somewhere in between. The point is it's factual whether you like the source or not. The point is the contrast if the circumstances were reversed.
 

witness23

Veteran Expediter
Ah yes, non-stories. Some of you see some of those when they're stories from a certain viewpoint. The point isn't whether it's a non-story, the story of the decade or somewhere in between. The point is it's factual whether you like the source or not. The point is the contrast if the circumstances were reversed.

The point is the story is manufactured to cause controversy where there isn't one, and you and obviously a few others here in the Soapbox are taking hook, line and sinker. The story isn't factual in the context that they are reporting it.

What you and others fail to realize, is that this story isn't coming from a rational place of reason or circumstance, therefore any rational person would disregard it for what it is, trash.
 

LDB

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
The point is the story is manufactured to cause controversy where there isn't one, and you and obviously a few others here in the Soapbox are taking hook, line and sinker. The story isn't factual in the context that they are reporting it.

What you and others fail to realize, is that this story isn't coming from a rational place of reason or circumstance, therefore any rational person would disregard it for what it is, trash.

Oh, so Dan Rather is the source of the story?

It isn't factual huh. Reagan lived there for a time. It's being razed to build the parking lot of the Obama library. What's not factual? What do you know that others don't? What are your sources? Perhaps you were there and know Reagan actually lived somewhere else? Perhaps you were there when the decision was made to alter the parking lot to avoid razing the house? You seem to know everything about it so enlighten us.
 

witness23

Veteran Expediter
Oh, so Dan Rather is the source of the story?

Not following you on that one :confused: It's almost as if you are just rambling at this point.

It isn't factual huh. Reagan lived there for a time. It's being razed to build the parking lot of the Obama library. What's not factual? What do you know that others don't? What are your sources? Perhaps you were there and know Reagan actually lived somewhere else? Perhaps you were there when the decision was made to alter the parking lot to avoid razing the house? You seem to know everything about it so enlighten us.

You really should quit while your ahead, you're looking desperate and not very intelligent to boot.
 

Humble2drive

Expert Expediter
The point is the contrast if the circumstances were reversed.

This was certainly not the point of the article quoted. :confused:

The short and meaningless blurb had no point other than an old house that Ronald Reagan lived in for a while is being raised by the University that owns it. It would actually receive a failing grade in a high school journalism class because it has no premise, no points and no conclusion It is left up to the reader to draw their own conclusion.
Pondering the negative implications of a similar article with circumstances "reversed" from a race related perspective was manufactured in the dark recesses of your mind. Just interesting that you choose to go in that direction once again. :rolleyes:
 

LDB

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Not rambling at all. I bolded your statement that the story isn't factual which led to the possibility that Dan Rather was the source. Sorry, guess it went over your head.
 

witness23

Veteran Expediter
Not rambling at all. I bolded your statement that the story isn't factual which led to the possibility that Dan Rather was the source. Sorry, guess it went over your head.

You like to deal in hypotheticals and generalities quite a bit don't you?
 

muttly

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
It wouldn't. I was being facetious. Laugh much?

I didn't know you were being sarcastic regarding this. No, don't laugh as much nowadays. Seen too much what Obama's retarded policies have done to people I know.
 
Top