Should have worn a "Depends" then.
Dood had to pee. When ya gotta go, ya gotta go.
Yeah ... Rand is a lightweight ... I'm sure a big-mouthed blowhard could at least double it ...
Heard an American Politics historian today on the radio talking about filibusters. Said in the past it was not uncommon for those doing the filibustering to have devices to handle the problem that eventually got the better of Rand Paul.
When pressed by the interviewer, he said, well yeah, they'd use catheters, as they intended to speak as long as possible and bathroom breaks were not allowed. One filibusterer, however, did ask for a break to be allowed as his "device" had come undone...
I'd love to see tapes of these guys who used catheters to see if, during their filibuster, their voice and inflection became rushed or tense, then suddenly lightened, while a slight smile of relief crossed their face...
The lengths some will go to to delay proceedings.
Although there is nothing PROHIBITING the REPEATING of the same PHRASE over and over I think it would be FROWNED on.Yeah ... Rand is a lightweight ... I'm sure a big-mouthed blowhard could at least double it ...
...and a lot of votes would change over time to end the filibuster.Although there is nothing PROHIBITING the REPEATING of the same PHRASE over and over I think it would be FROWNED on.
Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. If a vote is to be taken nullifying the Bill of Rights, I sure hope someone delays those proceedings.The lengths some will go to to delay proceedings.
Nope - Obama couldn't hold a candle to the particular blowhard I had in mind.No, Obama is president, not a senator.
There have already been several. Remember the PATRIOT Act, PATRIOT II, provisional extensions, NDAA, etc.?There will be no "vote" on eliminating the Bill of Rights or the Constitution. They are already well on the way to doing that. It is happening and this is little that can be done to stop it.