I did, with this:No-one has yet to challenge what I said that flat rates are always cheap. It's true and everyone knows it. Percentage....
The only motivation they had to move at a loss was for their established customers, some with contracts, most of whom they didn't want to lose when rates went back up. They offered many loads at reduced rates to prevent from moving at a loss, as well. I rarely took the reduced rate loads (like 65 and 70 cents plus FSC), but many did. But as I've noted in the past, the key there was knowing the system and working it to my advantage, staying away from the other vans and sticking to the fringes where they paid better, even at a loss, in order to satisfy that customer for the long term. Those drivers who wanted to stay in Midwest Hеll were at a distinct geographical and competitive disadvantage.But how motivated is the carrier going to be to move a truck at a loss? They will more than likely let a truck sit till they can reduce the loss or break even. Financially the sitting truck is better than a loss to them.
Yeah. yeah I know but that is a far cry from saying:My household expenses are also tax deductible....well at least about 10% of them....since about 10% of the total sq. footage is for OFFICE use....aka computer room...
He has everything included in there except for the kitchen sink. I know that a small portion of the household expenses can be deducted for tax purposes, but the remaining (vast) majority of those expenses along with health/dental insurance, retirement. That should be paid out of the drivers wages.rollincoal said:Profit is what's left after all fuel, insurance, plates, permits, maintinence, taxes and a reasonable comparible wage to that any company driver would pull in, plus health/dental insurance, retirement and household expenses come out of that settlement, what's left is profit...
Then quite simply you were running for the wrong owner.Dave you know a lot of trucks at panther aren't even getting $1.35. I drove for an owner and his was getting $1.05 solo and $1.10 team.
Well no, not really. Because he is writing in such absolute terms, and breaking everything down to include health care, retirement, and household expenses, and drivers pay. it is/was logical for me to assume that he meant household expenses. After all he was in the middle of telling someone else that they didn't understand what constituted profit. Someone who then goes on to explain what profit consists of would surly say that a portion of his household expenses would be tax deductible.I don't see where he said his utilities were a business expense. I see where he said "household expense". And yes those will come out of your settlement or you won't have a house or utilities very long. Anything after all bills being paid is "profit".
Yes but in one of your posts you also had included drivers pay. Drivers pay should pay for the non business related expenses, right?You're reading something into what I posted that I didn't post. Business and personal are seperate. My point is, if the business does not make enough money to cover all business costs, and all personal costs, then have money left over at the end... ....it is an unprofitable business...
I agree, it just means that you don't know what their rates are or what their expenses are, or their pay package is.Not knowing much at all about the going rates for cargo vans and straight trucks doesn;t mean I am clueless about how trucking companies operate.
I have no experience with big trucks, but I think it's safe to say A trucking company is a trucking company be it big trucks or small...A trucking company is a trucking company be it big trucks or small... Someone who knows, preferably someone with experience in both big and small trucks tell me if this is wrong....
That is the rub, at least for me. You don't know for a fact that all big truck carriers pay that. If you left out the word fact, and said most instead of all, I would agree with you......I know for a fact that flat rates from all of the trucking companies out there, for BIG trucks, are dirt cheap rates that barely cover some of the truck's operating costs, and make nothing above and beyond that... In fact most of them don;t even pay well enough to do that... And there are lots of suckers out there who line up to haul for those rates... There are even independanst who don't do much better themselves... So, flat rates to cargo vans and straight trucks are the road to riches?? riiight, that's what I figured...
You say that with reasonable certainty, but admit you know nothing about the rate or packages. You said that they are all along the same line, that is an incorrect assumptionI say with reaosnable certainty that flat rates offered to small trucks by all the expedite companies are along the same lines. I know for a fact that the rates many of the expedite companies are paying their big truck owner operators, while sometimes better (but not always), than typical 95 cents a mile plus a fuel surcharge at a general freight company are still not all that great... I saw one ad for expedite big truck that claimed "up to" $2.10 a mile or something like that... The "catch" there being "up to". Knowing what I know about ads and how companies overhype what they have to attract suckers that is likley a rate that doesn;t include any deadhead... and likely those trucks are doing good if they're clearing $1.50 a mile all miles in... $2 a mile is CHEAP for a big truck and a person can do substantially better than that on a loaded miles rate with expdite and yes, even general freight....
That was agreed to very early in this thread.All I'm saying is that a savvy operator will make out far better on percentage than any of the cheap flat rate offers out there.
There is that absolute thingy again.Flat rates are ALWAYS cheap in trucking..... But one man's cheap is another's gold mine I suppose...
But how motivated is the carrier going to be to move a truck at a loss? They will more than likely let a truck sit till they can reduce the loss or break even. Financially the sitting truck is better than a loss to them.
Yes and no. For a smaller carrier or one that primarily bids on loads your analysis is correct. With the larger carriers it can be different. As Turtle described, a carrier will move trucks out of an area at break-even or at a loss when other areas run out of trucks and there is a need. Some contracts require a carrier only truck so the carrier can't broker that freight out to say a partner carrier.
They also recover that loss from running that freight with their own trucks verses paying a potentially higher rate to a contract carrier just to cover the load.
Many other loads like DOD, HM, speciality and pharmaceutical loads fall in to that category. That is where you hear of a 1000 mile deadhead to cover a 100 mile load. All miles paid of course.
I think it depends on the carrier and what kind of customer base they are operating with.
I agree but I think unless you had an excessive deadhead a contract customers rate is going to be sufficient to move the truck at contracted rate without a loss.
Then quite simply you were running for the wrong owner.
Now why do you say that? He wasn't stiffing me and certainly isn't the only owner with that contracted rate. He is a 2 truck owner not 5 or 10 so he really doesn't have room to negotiate because panther has a line of fresh out of the mill inexperienced drivers ready to go in a straight truck. Any other company he could probably negotiate with but his dealing with panther when I was there didn't pay off.
I'm not saying that he was doing you wrong, but if I can sign on with a fleet owner who is running for PII at $1.30 - or $1.40 and pay me the same percentage then I would run for him. Same goes for the Fleet owner. There are several Carriers that pay more than $1.10.Now why do you say that? He wasn't stiffing me and certainly isn't the only owner with that contracted rate. He is a 2 truck owner not 5 or 10 so he really doesn't have room to negotiate because panther has a line of fresh out of the mill inexperienced drivers ready to go in a straight truck. Any other company he could probably negotiate with but his dealing with panther when I was there didn't pay off.
Now I'm not saying they are a bad company but they could pay better rates. Especially since they wanted to keep us loaded with elite service loads.
Regardless i feel like a better gig now. Yeah I get dirty and have to do laundry twice a week now but it too me is worth it.
I think I agree with this?Apples and Oranges Apples get the Percentage Oranges get the Miles and keep moven.