Obama hails puppy-killer
- Thread starter aristotle
- Start date
witness23
Veteran Expediter
Did someone ask for Wes Welker's 2009 stats?
Actually yes. The question was "A white wide receiver?"Followed by "That's funny" What is funny? That there is no white wide receivers? I just gave you one with his stats. So the answer is YES.
No. Wes Welker's stats were given as an example. Isn't that obvious to you?
A lot of people don't put him on a pedestal anymore and want to see him retire and go away. They are tired of his act of retiring and then playing,quitting and then playing again.
Again, no, it didn't. The question was "What about if he were a white receiver?"
The "Oh, wait. A white wide receiver? That's funny..." part was a comment posed in the form of a sarcastic, rhetorical question.
I cannot believe that you have such a hard time with basic English comprehension, but the alternative is even more unflattering.
On the other hand, "That there is no white wide receivers..." may very well point to the former. I dunno. Hard tellin'.
I get confused when people have more than one screen name. Hard to take them seriously. But you probably know that already.
Let's not hijack this thread and turn it into a racial controversy. For those having difficulty staying on the original topic, please start your own threads with racial diatribes. This thread is about a vicious puppy-killer being lauded by the president of the United States.
jaminjim
Veteran Expediter
Isn't that an integral part of the Story?
No. Why inject race into this thread except in an attempt to shut it down? Read the OP.
Well, considering Michael Vick never admitted to, nor was found guilty of killing any puppies, or dogs, and considering the co-founder of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Ingrid E. Newkirk, in a statement issued on behalf of PETA, backed both the President and Vick fully, saying, “Obama’s a sports guy, Vick’s a sports guy, and comebacks and redemption can happen,” and considering that President Barack Hussein Obama did not, in fact, call the owner of the NFL's Philadelphia Eagles to applaud his decision to hire well known puppy-killer Michael Vick, but rather called to comment that, “So many people who serve time never get a fair second chance. It’s never a level playing field for prisoners when they get out of jail,” the only conclusion is the OP is based on a false premise. Since the OP is based on a false premise, it cannot be hijacked, and people are free to conclude on their own the reasons behind such a false premise.
In The United States District Court for the Eastern Division of Virginia: Date August 24,2007
United States of America v. Michael Vick (defendant)
Criminal NO. 3:07CR274
Read Vick's plea agreement
Read Summary of facts
On August 20,2007 Vick pleads guilty to federal felony dogfighting conspiracy charges. By stipulating to the facts as presented by the federal prosecutor in the summary of facts, Vick submits guilty plea. Federal Judge Henry Hudson increased Vick's sentence for deception even after reaching plea agreement.
Clearly, Michael Vick participated in the illegal and tortuous deaths of several dogs. Then, he had the audacity to lie about his involvement even after reaching a plea agreement. For his continued lies and deception, Judge Hudson increased Vick's sentence. Puppy-killer, indeed.
United States of America v. Michael Vick (defendant)
Criminal NO. 3:07CR274
Read Vick's plea agreement
Read Summary of facts
On August 20,2007 Vick pleads guilty to federal felony dogfighting conspiracy charges. By stipulating to the facts as presented by the federal prosecutor in the summary of facts, Vick submits guilty plea. Federal Judge Henry Hudson increased Vick's sentence for deception even after reaching plea agreement.
Clearly, Michael Vick participated in the illegal and tortuous deaths of several dogs. Then, he had the audacity to lie about his involvement even after reaching a plea agreement. For his continued lies and deception, Judge Hudson increased Vick's sentence. Puppy-killer, indeed.
I got your sarcasm about the white wide receiver question. Funny? Pretty low brow humor. The other question If he was a white wide receiver would he receive same treatment as Vick? What difference does it make if he were a white wide receiver or a black wide receiver, a white qb, or a black qb? A dog torturer is a dog torturer.
Agree . I was only responding to the other posts who injected race.
It's true that most serial killers admit to having begun torturing animals in childhood - but is that true of Vick? And was it 'bloodlust' - or just part of the business, really? [Either way, I totally agree with your last sentence.]
Maybe everyone arrested for dog fighting should have their childhood looked at - might get some potential killers off the streets before they progress to killing people.
I read the fact as stipulated, not one of which stated that he was a puppy killer, or that he participated in any way in the killing of a puppy. So you're premise is still a false one, but even if Vick were a convicted and admitted puppy killer, everything else within the OP is still false.
Yet you believed it to be a real question instead of sarcasm, and decided to answer it.
That wasn't the other question, that was the only question, and you answering a question with a question isn't the same as answering it. But at this point don't bother, as I no longer want your opinion on the matter. It seems not to be worth it.
Actually, the common tactic of the left is to level a charge of racism when someone merely mentions race, which is precisely what you are doing here.
As far as debate, since your premise is false and largely fabricated, there is nothing to debate. Just because you think he is a puppy killer doesn't make him one, just because you think Obama made a phone call to applaud a puppy killer doesn't mean that's why the call was made. These are pretty straightforward facts that anyone should be able to discern. One doesn't even have to go to law school to be able to grasp these concepts.
I am sure your grammatical mistake ( using the contraction "you're" instead of the correct possessive pronoun "your") has nothing to do with your obvious sense of frustration over Vick's time in prison for the slaughter of pets. Keep defending the indefensible.