Correct.Only a moron would carry when they know absolutely positively without any possible question or doubt there's no way an attack will occur.
I was on a charity bike run and a couple riding together had side arms others and myself couldn't believe that this couple deemed it necessary to carry hand guns on a charity run, I think they were a coupe of posers or morons.
I keep thinking about this situation in the Wal-Mart and can't help going back to this part of the article (emphasis mine):Maybe it's that he starts off telling his wife he can see himself doing exactly the same thing in the same situation and then does a 180 to the typical academic position that CHL holders/practitioners are stupid for doing so and he has divested himself of all his guns by putting them at his father's. Kind of like what I said already. It's fine if he disagrees with me. It's his, and anyone else's, privilege to be wrong.
What I tried to explain to my wife—who thought Wilcox should have been running in the other direction, seeking cover—was that I could not blame him one bit. I could see myself doing exactly the same thing in the same scenario. Armed with a handgun and licensed to carry it concealed on his person, Wilcox read the situation, saw Miller—male, armed, firing a long gun and yelling—and thought he had an opportunity to end the threat.
He did not notice the diminutive woman on the sidelines with shopping cart and the handbag. She evidently had not made a scene. Wilcox approached Miller from behind. From his perspective, he had a chance to end the killing. From a broader perspective, he was already marked for death. Amanda came up behind him and pumped multiple shots into his ribs.
No - you're right. Seek cover FIRST, then determine whether or not you can neutralize the threat.Pilgrim: I got the impression the wife thought Wilcox should have been running for cover instead of attempting to end the threat, rather than as a preliminary step. I could be wrong, though, lol.
Money paid for a high-priced handgun is money spent. Money paid for lessons and training is money invested. It's like buying a private plane and not bothering to learn how to fly it.PS I think the problem is people who spend the money to buy a weapon, take whatever classes are obligatory, and don't put any more thought into the possible ways it can change their thinking/attitude.