How could I forget that? Meant every word, too.
Oh gees there is a great idea!! Ur a wacko man
Sent from my ADR6300 using EO Forums
How could I forget that? Meant every word, too.
Bet you don't like them darn blacks either ...
Sent from my ADR6300 using EO Forums
You are attacking religion in many of your posts here. While I'm not super religious I do have faith. Also you are trying to force us to support gays. I'm not with them or against them, meaning I'm not got to march with them but I'm not going to beat and murder them either.
A question to ask here is, Would you be so defensive if your nephew wasn't gay? Why should we agree and support gay marriage? What happens when a kid with 2 moms or dads get picked on in school for the type of parents they have?
I have seen to many drug addictions and suicides out of children with same sex parents because of the ridicule from class mates with "normal" parents.
Be gay ok it's your life but leave kids out of it.
PS: It's Adam and eve not Adam and Steve.
Mayfield Express
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Lead to it? No time soon, but eventually. But before that, it will lead to acceptance of pedophilia. Both are deviant, both are sins, both damage all participants, both damage society, both were regarded as vile but have gained acceptance. Homosexuality was regarded as a mental disease until pressure was applied to remove it. The same pressure has begun with pedophilia. It's still early. It won't be accepted anytime soon, but maybe a couple decades. Then if the soapbox still exists, your philosophical and ideological heirs will be arguing for society to accept those poor, misunderstood men who were born that way and just want to be left alone, and who are we to say who can love whom? Yes, you are them in 20 years.Agreed. Let's stick to the logical conclusion that it will lead to marrying animals.
Bet you don't like them darn blacks either ...
Sent from my ADR6300 using EO Forums
Here's the difference. While some heterosexual sex might be immoral and unsanitary, ALL homosexual sex is immoral and unsanitary.Heteros engage in some pretty "immoral" and "unsanitary" acts themselves. They're all over the internet.
However, by pushing for marriage, they seek society's approval, that their perversion is the equal of normal people's sex lives.The "perversion" amongst gays (as some people feel) will continue whether they marry or not. Many local and state governments have archaic laws on the books banning such contact between people, be they same or opposite sex. Rarely do those laws get enacted. Yet people still go about doing what they want.
How do you consider my religion fake? My religion coincides with our scripture. Being so, you should consider it genuine, even if you disagree with it.I feel sorry for you for feeling this way about gays ..hope you change your mind!!
Don't feels sorry for me...I do a ok with out you religius fakes in my life!!!!!!!!!
Sent from my ADR6300 using EO Forums
How can any sane or reasonably moral individual say that one man putting his penis into another man's rectum is normal or the equivalent of heterosexual relations? And yes, it is bullying. Gays have moved beyond "leave us be so we can practice our thing in private--we just want to be left alone" to "NOW ACCEPT IT PUBLICLY--SAY IT'S OK! IF YOU DON'T, THERE'S SOMETHING WRONG WITH YOU!"I'm not bullying ...how can any sane individual with a thread of common sense say gay people are sick....
Lead to it? No time soon, but eventually. But before that, it will lead to acceptance of pedophilia. Both are deviant, both are sins, both damage all participants, both damage society,
All the above are subjective opinion, and yours is not mine.
both were regarded as vile but have gained acceptance.
Saying pedophilia "is gaining acceptance" doesn't make it true
.Homosexuality was regarded as a mental disease until pressure was applied to remove it.
Physicians believed illness was caused by too much blood, 'bad vapors', and all sorts of ridiculous causes at one time - we've learned that they were dead wrong. Their patients were just dead.
The same pressure has begun with pedophilia. It's still early. It won't be accepted anytime soon, but maybe a couple decades. Then if the soapbox still exists, your philosophical and ideological heirs will be arguing for society to accept those poor, misunderstood men who were born that way and just want to be left alone, and who are we to say who can love whom? Yes, you are them in 20 years.
Sex between consenting adults is the only acceptable standard - if either party isn't consenting, or isn't ADULT, it's immoral and illegal.
Every 'argument' against homosexuality [and it's funny, but only those who rail against it use such terms as 'butt buddy' - pretty indicative of where their minds are, methinks], boils down to "Because the Bible says so" and 'tradition'. Neither of which is an acceptable reason to decree what consenting adults may or may not do.
Slavery was accepted, until reason prevailed. Denying women the right to vote was accepted, until reason prevailed. Denying homosexuals the right to marry is accepted by many - but reason WILL prevail.
'Defense of marriage'? That's hilarious, really - almost as good as 'Family Values', lol.
How can any sane or reasonably moral individual say that one man putting his penis into another man's rectum is normal or the equivalent of heterosexual relations? And yes, it is bullying. Gays have moved beyond "leave us be so we can practice our thing in private--we just want to be left alone" to "NOW ACCEPT IT PUBLICLY--SAY IT'S OK! IF YOU DON'T, THERE'S SOMETHING WRONG WITH YOU!"
Anal sex is part and parcel of homosexual sex, just as penile-vaginal sex is part and parcel of normal sex. Can sex exist apart from it? Yes, but not usually.Who said anything about rectums...see your the pervert here I said nothing about that ...so you think gay equals anal sex.. wow see where your mind is....again I think you have some deep down issues do come to.term.with...
You've got some things mixed up in that sentence, but sodomites weren't programmed to be attracted to others of the same sex. It's a defect. If it is inherent, maybe some wires got messed up in the womb, so to speak, or maybe it's the domineering mother/absent father thing. Whatever it is, their urges and their actions are two different matters. If anyone has an urge they say is inherent, and it's rape or arson or murder or bank robbery or whatever, I expect them to withstand their urges our face the consequences. Sodomites have it a little better, in that most people would settle for them doing their thing IN PRIVATE without normal people being exposed to it. But that's not good enough for them, is it?And just as you were programed to like the same sex as u claim...gays are born the opposite...so you are going to shun them because ???
Being black is not based on an act. That truly is something you're born with. Being a sodomite is something you do. It's offensive for you to link the two.
There you go ...they were BORN black....people are BORN gay...can't change being black ...can't change being gay ...ok smart *** ...YOU change and go gay....its what your asking of a gay person to just go straight....as vile as you think man on man is that's what they think of man on woman....HELLO!! SO NARROW MINDED!!!!!!!!!
come on go gay ...get a penis and YOU keep yapping about...ohh can't do it... Well niether can they change....are you getting it yet???
You know what is offensive .. is your narrow minded thoughts and hatred of how someone is born...you wouldn't hate a black man for being black...don't hate a person for being gay!!
Sent from my ADR6300 using EO Forums
You are attacking religion in many of your posts here.
Religion is the basis for denying homosexual couples the right to marry. And for the kind of namecalling that some engage in. And the derogatory attitude that encourages their children to consider 'gay' to be the absolute worst thing they can call anyone. And for teenagers to prefer suicide to being known [or suspected] of being gay.
While I'm not super religious I do have faith. Also you are trying to force us to support gays.
Not discriminating [let alone the morally despicable name calling] is hardly 'supporting', IMO.
I'm not with them or against them, meaning I'm not got to march with them but I'm not going to beat and murder them either.
Appreciate the self control. seriously: did you really say that?
A question to ask here is, Would you be so defensive if your nephew wasn't gay?
Defensive? I'm just as certain that denying gays their rights is wrong, and it's not defensive, it's what I know is morally right. And no, I have no gay family members or close friends [that I know of.]
Why should we agree and support gay marriage?
Because it's morally wrong to deny people the right to marry someone they love - [consenting adults].
What happens when a kid with 2 moms or dads get picked on in school for the type of parents they have?
Same thing that happens when kids get picked on/bullied for any reason: we teach them why it's wrong to do it.
I have seen to many drug addictions and suicides out of children with same sex parents because of the ridicule from class mates with "normal" parents.
There's so much wrong with that comment I don't even know where to start. But here's a thought: when we declare that two adults should not be allowed to marry because their children will be bullied, we are a seriously screwed up society.
Be gay ok it's your life but leave kids out of it.
PS: It's Adam and eve not Adam and Steve.
Only in the Bible. If you choose to make that your moral foundation, that's your right - but I have the same right not to.
Mayfield Express
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
'Defense of marriage'? That's hilarious, really - almost as good as 'Family Values', lol.