DannyD
Veteran Expediter
Some of ya's in this area might already know the story. The basics are a crook breaks into this guys house. The guy catches him in the act, & the crook flees. The guy chases the crook for a few blocks & then shoots him.
If you were to rule on this, what would be your verdict?
For what it's worth, I'd let the guy walk scott free. To my knowledge he has no previous arrest record. If he does the article didn't state it. So even though he didn't shoot him inside his house, the crook deserved to be shot.
If you were to rule on this, what would be your verdict?
For what it's worth, I'd let the guy walk scott free. To my knowledge he has no previous arrest record. If he does the article didn't state it. So even though he didn't shoot him inside his house, the crook deserved to be shot.