Claiming ones actions or words show ignorance is not calling one ignorant.
Actually, that's precisely what it is. To be ignorant is to be lacking in knowledge or training about a given subject. If someone claims that another's words
show ignorance, then they are also claiming the person is ignorant, at least about a given subject.
If one had actually called someone here ignorant, then that would be that that one also believes that person was ignorant in everything he does, (ie-tying their shoes, shifting gears, using a fork, picking their nose, etc), but that is not the case here.
Just because someone is ignorant about one subject, doesn't make them ignorant about any and all subjects. Stupid is as stupid does, but ignorance can be fixed by simple education.
I have full confidence that jim-jam has no issues at all when using a fork or picking his nose.
One was pointing out ignorant posting, that's all.
I dunno about that. Word is that he picks his food and forks his nose.
Funny how the same posters seem to show up and show their ignorance in certain controversial threads each and every time one starts up.
Ignorance is bliss.
What I thing is funny are the posters who rarely manage to reply to a post, even when they address the subject matter, without also taking a pot shot at the poster. Too many people reply to the poster, rather than what was posted. They have a difficult time in arguing the issues, and tend to resort to discrediting the poster. It happens here a lot.
It's no wonder why one certain members feels the way he does with the quality of intelligent posting going on here at times.
Clearly, I'm ignorant, 'cause I have no idea what
"one certain members" means, not to mention I did the uber ignorant quote-quote-quote thing. At least I'm blissful.