More Democrat propaganda, designed to discourage the Republican vote. Rather than fact check every clip, let's take the one from Nate Silver since his credibility is well established. He DOES NOT show Harris wining IA, and his national projection shows Harris with a lead of .7% - a statistical dead heat by anyone's standards.Polls Adjusting their Methods After Gold-Standard Iowa Poll is Published
It appears a genuine movement is underway among pollsters to bring their data in line with the Iowa Poll. It's turning out she is not an outlier at all, just a leader with a superior methodology.
=============================================
View attachment 24316
View attachment 24317
Nathaniel Read Silver is an American statistician, writer, and poker player who analyzes baseball, basketball, and elections. He is the founder of FiveThirtyEight, and held the position of editor-in-chief there, along with being a special correspondent for ABC News, until May 2023.
View attachment 24318
Stellar presidential winner margins predictions?Track Record Matters
As in Iowa, so too in Nevada; a seasoned hand with a stellar track record predicts a Harris win.
View attachment 24328
Ralston Provides Early NumbersTrack Record Matters
As in Iowa, so too in Nevada; a seasoned hand with a stellar track record predicts a Harris win.
View attachment 24328
See my response here.Wait...............Trump won the election, something went wrong, many in here had Kmallllaaa winning, well , ugh,,,many in here had KH winning all year and now what,,,,,,,,,,,,,,she did not make it,,,,,,,,,,,,,, do we need a recount since Trump won,,,,,,,,,,,,,no, many in here wanted Kamala and you did not win, but you said she would win and that did not happen................why were you all so wrong about Kamala?? Border Czar my butt, lol