RE: Is This Forum For Everyone, Or Just An Elite F
Diane, Jen, Freespirit,
>>Recently a few individuals have taken it upon themselves to declare who is or is not eligibleor qualified to post responses to inquiries or to share information. This bothers me greatly. Excuse me, but for those of you who believe credentialing is in order, by whose authorityare you acting? In my research of this Forum, I can find NOTHING that says individuals must be credentialed before they can post information, thoughts, beliefs or opinions. <<
Where is this? I have looked and can not find any posts that state any declarations are necessary.
>>It saddens me to see a small group of individuals try to take this Forum and turn it into something that only a perceived elite few are qualified to use in its' full capacity. If this small group succeeded, I believe it would be the beginning of the end for this Forum as newbies and individuals who do not ascribe to elitism left to find or create a site that welcomed everyone. <<
It saddens me as well that one individual successfully disrupted this forum a year ago or so and is once again at the heart of another dilemma. To top it off, this individual has also been a source of controversy while posting on at least three other web sites because of an inability to accept criticisms without inferring liable litigation would/could be pending anyone daring to pose a challenge to his statements or scenarios.
I’ll tell you what else saddens me...the wealth of knowledge that the members of this site have is being quashed. It saddens me that this site has been the leader in expediter forums and now members don’t feel free to post anymore. It REALLY saddens me that this cite is losing credibility, originality and diversity because we all have to be in lock step or we are perceived as ganging up on one person, carrier, or company.
>>No one may explicitly have said that someone should not post, but to even suggest that qualifiers ordisclaimers are necessary for a posting on a forum like this, is in effect saying that the poster should warn everyone that they are not qualified to answer the question. <<
I now add a disclaimer to my posts because I do not wish to fall prey to a pompous whacko’s law suit. I know even expressions of opinion based on disclosed facts that are true can spark a libel suit, regardless of whether one could ultimately sustain one and I don’t wish to find out. As far as qualifiers, they to were not part of anyone’s posts until just recently...what could have spurred this? (Hmm, I do wonder.)
>>Whether or not the individuals who started this whole "credentials" thing intended it or not, the side effect can be intimidation, rather than education. That is a side effect that I find very troubling.<<
Do you not think two moderators leaving a forum after years and subsequently posting public apologies is not a direct result of some intimidation or was this education? How about charter members no longer posting on this site since they left? These are some of the “side effects” from last years discourse on this site. In addition, take a look at how many posts have been “edited” or locked recently. I would point you to specific past posts that also relate to the “side effect” but they have been REMOVED.
All I have left to say is....I WANT THE OLD FORUM BACK!! Where there could be disagreement without threats of law suits, where actual ad hominem attacks were non-existent, where ALL members/guests felt welcome and non-threatened, where there was no such thing as a stupid question, where there was more than one right answer to a question, WHERE WE HAD RESPECT FOR EACH OTHER AND OUR DIFFERENCES!!
mcbride-
O/O-Super D unit-Team-6yrs
--What goes around comes around--
LEGAL NOTICE: The views and opinions expressed in this post are those held by the posting author and do not represent the views or opinions of Expediters Online.com, On Time Media, LLC, it's agents, subsidiaries, affiliates, advertisers or sponsors.