ENOUGH IS ENOUGH http://gracevine.christiantoday.com...a-remember-that-famous-speech-to-his-son-2381
Last edited:
That's the way I feel about it too. 4-5 years ago I would have to take myself out of service to get some sleep. Not so much these days. There are just so many sprinters out here now. Not to mention the "rental truck gang".Define...."busy"?
grossing $2,000 - 2,500 a week is not busy to me.... I remember the days of $3k - 4 k a week and an an occasion 5k
1,500 to 2 k was a bad week! Those days appear gone...
Nail on head.Therein lies the problem. If you're not running primarily customer freight, and busy, there's a lot more trucks than required to run the overflow freight.
17,288 trucks available on Sylectus. That's way up over last year and prior years. ANYONE can get on Sylectus, virtually.
View attachment 10866
Therein lies the problem. If you're not running primarily customer freight, and busy, there's a lot more trucks than required to run the overflow freight.
17,288 trucks available on Sylectus. That's way up over last year and prior years. ANYONE can get on Sylectus, virtually.
View attachment 10866
That's the way I feel about it too. 4-5 years ago I would have to take myself out of service to get some sleep. Not so much these days. There are just so many sprinters out here now. Not to mention the "rental truck gang".
I'm still making a living, but sure not saving as much as I used to.
Therein lies the problem. If you're not running primarily customer freight, and busy, there's a lot more trucks than required to run the overflow freight.
17,288 trucks available on Sylectus. That's way up over last year and prior years. ANYONE can get on Sylectus, virtually.
View attachment 10866
Well the other big problem is the complete amount of insurance fraud. We have been researching this hard over the last month or two. The amount of carriers operating vans with improper or purposely fraudulent insurance coverage has skyrocketed. This only helps to continue the push to lower and lower rates. Easy to lower rates when you do not have a legitimate cost structure. This fraudulent operating structure is even easier for someone to use to start up yet another van carrier. Thus the explosion continues and the continued over supply vs demand, instead of the market finding it's own natural correction and balance. Although many may not realize this it hurts the carriers running legitimate as much as it does the legitimate owner operator. Sadly many (and I am sure some on this board) run knowing they are not fully compliant and feel it is too their advantage, while all it does is hurt those doing it right. I personally spoke to one carrier owner about what he was doing and the fact he was running improperly. His response was I can't afford to run your cost structure set up. He didn't appreciate my response...if you can't and wont run legal and compliant maybe you need to exit the business.
I think the bigger correction could happen soon. Brokers like L1, Bolt & others are "putting their foot down" and flipping their requirements to match what you're describing, cutting off carriers. If enough of the brokered freight is controlled by brokers doing this, the carriers with the described issues won't have a choice if they want more freight sources.
Yep, it certainly made us add the policy. Not cheap at all.
But brokers still don't mind paying for the cheapest truck out there most of the time. But as more brokers cut off carriers the rates will hopefully stabilize a bit.
I think the bigger correction could happen soon. Brokers like L1, Bolt & others are "putting their foot down" and flipping their requirements to match what you're describing, cutting off carriers. If enough of the brokered freight is controlled by brokers doing this, the carriers with the described issues won't have a choice if they want more freight sources.
Yep, it certainly made us add the policy. Not cheap at all.
But brokers still don't mind paying for the cheapest truck out there most of the time. But as more brokers cut off carriers the rates will hopefully stabilize a bit.
John, is there any tell tale signs that a carriers insurance isn't adequate? What kind of questions should an o/o ask?
IMO...now should also be the shift to inform and educate brokers/shippers/3pls of their liability risks for putting their freight on a non compliant truck/under insured....an automated checking system where 1 click and they can see a complaint truck or NOT....and turn it away.
the on line insurance verification system (OIVS or something like that), as well as the SAFER system should already should be able to check for proper insurance coverage.
but another problem is due to the Sylectus fallacies. Sylectus signs up lots of foreign companies with only one truck, instead of the 10 that they require American companies to have. We all have seen them on the road, there are thousands and they have thousands of trucks, driving down rates, and they may or may not have the proper insurance. If they win bids on Sylectus, does the broker awarding the bid check for proper insurance? probably not, as long as the bid is low.