Largest crowd is correct, however you also need to be wary of the inevitable unintended consequences, of which there always are.
The law of unintended consequences is what happens when a simple system tries to regulate a complex system. The political system is simple, it operates with limited information (rational ignorance), short time horizons, low feedback, and poor and misaligned incentives. Society in contrast is a complex, evolving, high-feedback, incentive-driven system. When a simple system tries to regulate a complex system you often get unintended consequences, where well-meaning legislation often winds up hurting the parties it is designed to help.
Some unintended consequences are positive, like the sinking of ships in shallow water during war time created some magnificent reefs for undersea diversity, medieval policy of setting up large hunting reserves for the nobility has resulted in many large preserves of green space for parks, anticoagulant properties of pain killing aspirin prevents and mitigates heart attacks.
Some are negative, like Prohibition in the 1920s designed to suppress the alcohol trade and reduce consumption ended up concentrating the profits from illegal alcohol into a small number of hands, enabling the funding to dabble into other illegal organized crime activities. The War on Drugs does the same thing by concentrating drug profits into the cartels. Other examples include the CIA's covert funding of the Afghan Mujahideen, which directly contributed to the rise of Al Qaeda, the introduction of Kudzu as a means of ornamental ground cover and earthworks erosion control has resulted in a complete takeover of Kudzu in many parts of the South, forest fire prevention policies which have resulted in reduced forest diversity and increases mass fires, and dam building that destroys wet lands and makes floods more likely.
Some unintended consequences yield perverse results, like the installation of tall smokestacks to reduce pollution in local areas ended up spreaded pollution at high altitudes giving us acid rain, the draining of America's wetlands resulting in flash floods and season droughts, the DOT regulation requiring airlines to hold reservations and refund the ticket price without a penalty within 24 hours of booking the flight resulted in higher air fares across he board and in Spirit Airlines charging a $2 "Department of Transportation Unintended Consequence Fee" to each ticket.
The FMCSA's CSA was supposed to identify and eliminate unsafe drivers and carriers from the road, but the results are inverse to the actual crash statistics and have resulted in fear and overreaction in the marketplace, as well as carriers unfairly hit with higher insurance rates despite lower crash occurrences.
My favorite is the unintended consequences of the FMCSA HoS rules, designed to increase safety by getting truckers more rest, and decrease the number of trucks on the road, and has resulted in less rest for many truckers, and a marked increase in the number of trucks on the road since more trucks are now required to haul the same freight.
Not only will it be fought by shippers, it will be fought by anyone involved in business. That's why the Mexican Cross Border program, which no one in business is in favor of publicly, is supported by nearly everyone in business privately, since it lowers the wholesale costs of goods.
