This is from Blacks Law Dictionary
What is INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR?
This term describes the person who is asked do perform an action or job who maintains the control over the job.
We have drivers that lease trucks and they pay Mayfield Express a percentage of the income from the trucks. As for providing the contractor equipment to do the job. Our driver's rent equipment from us to do the job. They have control over what loads they take or turn down.
Like Davekc we used a Lawyer for our contract.
I don't think leasing a truck from a carrier will pass in the future if what I think will happen does take place. Again, the driver is only paying you a percentage if and only if they are generating revenue so that is not a true lease no matter what you or your lawyer call it as there is no fixed monthly payment required if the driver is not generating any revenue. The drivers have no fixed expenses to operate their supposed business outside of what it would cost them to live anyways. They generate profit when it is busy but they do not incur losses when it is slow.
They are only incurring expenses if they are generating revenue therefore there is no reasonable chance for significant loss.
That is also why real estate and mortgage agents who are also paid on a percentage basis are considered to be self employed as they can and do incur significant expenses in advertising costs, travel expenses etc... All the while with no guarantee that they will ever make a sale.
The driver in our industry however only incurs expenses if they are being guaranteed revenue, therefore there is not an equal or even reasonable chance or expectation of profit and loss. I think that is the most heavily weighted part of the stress test even over and above who owns the "tools" to do the job or wether or not they are dictated to as to how the work is to be performed in determining ic/employee status.
Yes, as fleet owners you may have passed audits and contract reviews for now, however going forward I believe it is going to change. Hopefully the IRS or in our case the CRA, will not be vindictive enough to try to collect retroactively (ya right).