Free cellular... only for welfare recipients

[Turtle]

As Leo stated, do keep in mind that when you post a picture containing text, it is exactly the same as if you typed the text yourself. The above picture, for example, while funny, is nothing more than calling either the post ("That's stupid") or the poster ("You're stupid") magnitudinally stupid with no explanation as to why they think that might be. This adds nothing to the conversation or to further the debate and when not accompanied by the aforementioned explanation, could easily be construed as a personal attack.

Unexplained simplified comments ("That's stupid!") or attacks ("You're stupid!") are often much like those "in-depth" Internet movie reviews which consist solely of, "This movie rocks! Go see it!" or "This movie sux! Don't go see it!" Neither of which is very constructive or helpful, much less thought provoking.

Just something to keep in mind for future reference.

 

[Tennesseahawk]

Rather than abortions they should tie the tubes of women and do vasectomies on men opting for welfare as well as cap any benefits to the number of children at time of application.

Normally, I'd say LMAO. But this calls for...

See? Mao likes your idea.

 

[Dakota]

As Leo stated, do keep in mind that when you post a picture containing text, it is exactly the same as if you typed the text yourself. The above picture, for example, while funny, is nothing more than calling either the post ("That's stupid") or the poster ("You're stupid") magnitudinally stupid with no explanation as to why they think that might be. This adds nothing to the conversation or to further the debate and when not accompanied by the aforementioned explanation, could easily be construed as a personal attack.

Unexplained simplified comments ("That's stupid!") or attacks ("You're stupid!") are often much like those "in-depth" Internet movie reviews which consist solely of, "This movie rocks! Go see it!" or "This movie sux! Don't go see it!" Neither of which is very constructive or helpful, much less thought provoking.

Just something to keep in mind for future reference.

Stupid is as stupid does

 

[LDB]

Yeah, I had to go there and put it into overdrive. Some people have such short and easy chains. There certainly shouldn't be a reward for creating more and more babies to get more checks.

 

[Tennesseahawk]

Yeah, I had to go there and put it into overdrive. Some people have such short and easy chains. There certainly shouldn't be a reward for creating more and more babies to get more checks.

No, there shouldn't be. But I found Mao to be totally compatible with your solution, with him determining how many children a couple could have, and all. That, and I was looking for an excuse to use that pic.

And now I'll use this one...

 

[clcooper]

no wonder the government keeps doing stuff like this . people cant stand beside each other on a issue .common sense and right from wrong

 

[Turtle]

Stupid is as stupid does

Been there done that.

 

[Dakota]

Been there done that.

We all have, and admiting it is the 1st step

 

[chefdennis]

Hi...I am Dennis and I have and continue to do Stupid, Really Stupid thing.....on a continuous basis....

 

[Dakota]

Hello Dennis

 

[scottm4211]

I bought a Virgin Mobile phone.

Posted with my Droid EO Forum App

 

[chefdennis]

Hi Scott....Welcome...

 

[asjssl]

not calling any one stupid just the idea that the government should pay for abortions too!!While we are at it why not let them decide Who gets aborted and who dont.I can see it know no more republicans are allowed to have children!!!!!

Yah laugh it up.funny guy.....don't.you think there's enough people with there hands out in this country.....so let's keep having kids for the government to raise..think of the mess this is going to create...of all the $$ this country ****es away ...a little free birth control and abortions to who ever wants em...line up ....yup I'm stupid.......better yet...$5,000 to any one who gets there tubes tied !!! They will be lining up.100 deep...


Posted with my Droid EO Forum App

 

[layoutshooter]

Government has NO business in the health care business in any way, shape or form. Once they take over health care they WILL dictate it's out come. Too many people? Don't allow children. Far fetched? I don't think so. Government restricts freedom. NOTHING is worth the loss of freedoms. Health care at the point of a gun does NOT enhance freedom, it destroys it. Right now, unless the SC court or congress gets rid of Obama care we have health care by force. Welcome to hell.

 

[asjssl]

Government has NO business in the health care business in any way, shape or form. Once they take over health care they WILL dictate it's out come. Too many people? Don't allow children. Far fetched? I don't think so. Government restricts freedom. NOTHING is worth the loss of freedoms. Health care at the point of a gun does NOT enhance freedom, it destroys it. Right now, unless the SC court or congress gets rid of Obama care we have health care by force. Welcome to hell.

I agree....but don't you think we are creating A WHOLE BUNCH OF SHEEP with all of this public assistance....you don't bite the hand that feeds you...talk about dictating......36% of the state of Alabama is on food stamps.....now...anybody that would accept free birth control pills/abortion probably don't have the $$$$ to raise a child all on there own...without public assistance..how much does it cost to the govt. To support 1 child??...I don't see the problem...nobody is forcing you ...but if YOU wish... any and all birth control FREE OF CHARGE...of all of the things we give away in this country.....think of it as maintenance of the population...we have to do something....any other ideas ....I'm open...


Posted with my Droid EO Forum App

 

[tbubster]

Yah laugh it up.funny guy.....don't.you think there's enough people with there hands out in this country.....so let's keep having kids for the government to raise..think of the mess this is going to create...of all the $$ this country ****es away ...a little free birth control and abortions to who ever wants em...line up ....yup I'm stupid.......better yet...$5,000 to any one who gets there tubes tied !!! They will be lining up.100 deep...


Posted with my Droid EO Forum App

Thats part of the problem that thinking right there."There is another post I belive it is titled "how did we survive"That thread really says where we are at now compared to where we were 30-40 years ago.When did it Become my responsibility to pay for your bad choices in life.As the country becomes more liberal more and more we hear its not my fault,its not your fault,its not fair I dont have what I want, and you do. I can have as many babys as I want and the government can pay for them.

As the country has become more liberal "personal responsibility" is deing a slow painful death. You see that 8-10 dollars a month per woman times millions of woman a year turns into billions a year at the cost of the people that still live that personal responsibility way of life.Its people like you that are part of the problem.Thinking that the government should pay for aborations REALLY???????But then it is a man and womans right to do the dirty if they choice,However it is no my Responsibility to pay for their Birth controll nor their choice if she get knocked up.You see I had no part of that party.

If you become a leach on society by making welfare a way of life then you should have rules to follow,there are things you should have to do.And one of them if you are a woman tubes tied/a man snip snip no 5,000 dollars you already get get money from the government we should not have to pay you not to have anymore kids you can not afford to pay for.Want your welfare check pee in this cup.Dont like it you dont have to be on welfare.Im tired of haveing to pay for other people choseing this way of life.

I was not trying to be a "FUNNY GUY" but the Idea of the government should pay for aborations is a stupid idea!The whole cell phone thing has been going on for awhile.that to is a stupid idea.Dont forget when you say you think the government should pay for something.It is us that pay you and me.After all it is tax money that pays for it.

So here is a thought.why dont all the people that Say they are willing to pay more in taxes,Their share put all that extra money they SAY they are willing to pay into a fund to help pay for abortions,cell phones,Cable,healthy food,anything else they think someone has the right to have even though they refuse to earn it..You know the people like matt damon,sean penn,will smith,p-diddy,Obama,harry reid,miss nancy, You know the ones that scream how bad and unfair our system is while making millions of dollars a year,flying on those private jets they cry are so bad.You know the ones that pay 2,000 3,000 thousand a night to stay in a hotel while they say its not fair people are losing their homes because they can not afford to make that payment.You know the kind that buys their kid a 360,000 dollar car for his 16th birthday.One of them put up or shut up ideas.I know I know what about all the rich republicans that live the same way.Well we are not the ones preaching about how wrong it is to live like this yet do it anyway.


In closing I will say again It is not my responsibility to pay for your way of life.That is your responsibility and your's alone

 

[asjssl]

Thats part of the problem that thinking right there."There is another post I belive it is titled "how did we survive"That thread really says where we are at now compared to where we were 30-40 years ago.When did it Become my responsibility to pay for your bad choices in life.As the country becomes more liberal more and more we hear its not my fault,its not your fault,its not fair I dont have what I want, and you do. I can have as many babys as I want and the government can pay for them.

As the country has become more liberal "personal responsibility" is deing a slow painful death. You see that 8-10 dollars a month per woman times millions of woman a year turns into billions a year at the cost of the people that still live that personal responsibility way of life.Its people like you that are part of the problem.Thinking that the government should pay for aborations REALLY???????But then it is a man and womans right to do the dirty if they choice,However it is no my Responsibility to pay for their Birth controll nor their choice if she get knocked up.You see I had no part of that party.

If you become a leach on society by making welfare a way of life then you should have rules to follow,there are things you should have to do.And one of them if you are a woman tubes tied/a man snip snip no 5,000 dollars you already get get money from the government we should not have to pay you not to have anymore kids you can not afford to pay for.Want your welfare check pee in this cup.Dont like it you dont have to be on welfare.Im tired of haveing to pay for other people choseing this way of life.

I was not trying to be a "FUNNY GUY" but the Idea of the government should pay for aborations is a stupid idea!The whole cell phone thing has been going on for awhile.that to is a stupid idea.Dont forget when you say you think the government should pay for something.It is us that pay you and me.After all it is tax money that pays for it.

So here is a thought.why dont all the people that Say they are willing to pay more in taxes,Their share put all that extra money they SAY they are willing to pay into a fund to help pay for abortions,cell phones,Cable,healthy food.You know the people like matt damon,sean penn,will smith,p-diddy,Obama,harry reid,miss nancy,and you seeing how you think its what should be done.One of them put up or shut up ideas.

In closing I will say again It is not my responsibility to pay for your way of life.That is your responsibility and your's alone

I.agree 100% with you....I think we should abolish all public assitance...problem is people will not be responsible...so what we end up with is a bunch of sheep with there hands out....why is it stupid to ponder the idea of free birth control?? Sure would start shrinking the amount of people sucking on the system....and the 5,000 idea for getting " fixed" a lot cheaper than the govt raising the 3,4,5 ... kids they would have spawn....good investment I think...again all optional not forced...again I agree It drives me mental to the sheer # of people just saying screw.it I don't want to work....and throwing there hands out for us to.take care of...I know of at least 10 people on ss disability....and theres nothing wrong with them....again I agree with you .....but what do we do...I know...no more welfare...sorry ....bet the find some kind of work...


Posted with my Droid EO Forum App

 

[cheri1122]

Wow - you guys are having so much fun ripping those irresponsible poor folks to shreds I almost hate to point out that while you're aiming at the little targets, the big guns are aiming at you.
A few quotes from the link Turtle provided [that you didn't read, clearly]:
"The USF [universal service fee added to phone service bills] was created to establish essential communications links for low income residents in underserved areas"
Translation: the poor couldn't afford cell phones, and couldn't get landlines because the phone companies wouldn't run the lines - not enough profit.
"As with many such well intentioned federal ideas, the program has grown into something that helps the well connected businesses more than it helps the needy get connected." "Rural phone companies that provide "high cost" wireline service get more than 4 billion a year. Why the taxpayer should subsidize rural service today is odd, considering that 96.2 have access to phone service."
"In 2008, the USF gave the Oregon Telephone Corporation $16, 384 federal subsidy for each subscriber in Beaver Creek, Washington."

But y'all keep telling yourselves that you know who the 'real enemy' is, [ those damlazy poor people!] while those true American saviors [corporate go getters] bleed us all dry as a bone.

 

[LDB]

I think maybe the too small to read and not contrasty enough to read post makes the point, at least in a round about way, that the dam government has no business allowing companies to steal from the rest of us. Then again, since it's in such hard to read color and size, it may say something about emu farming. If only it was at least default size for the forum even if not full contrast.

 

[cheri1122]

I think maybe the too small to read and not contrasty enough to read post makes the point, at least in a round about way, that the dam government has no business allowing companies to steal from the rest of us. Then again, since it's in such hard to read color and size, it may say something about emu farming. If only it was at least default size for the forum even if not full contrast.

The "too small to read" type is larger than this [default] size. Maybe someone needs new glasses, because my eyes are old too, and I have no problem reading it.....