Fox News Dirty tricks on Ron Paul

[RLENT]

Cmon kid get real. My first post on this subject was about the title of this thread Fox News Dirty Tricks. I commented that it was probably a sloppy editing error and not someone with bad motives out to destroy Ron Paul.

And on what factual or experiential basis did you come up with that conclusion ?

Do you have any intimate, personal experience with the media ? .... video news production ?

Have you reviewed some white paper done by the NAB (National Association of Broadcasters) that studied and documented editing and production errors that determined causes ?

..... or was the above supposition just pulled from some dark, warm, and moist place on the lower portion of the anatomy ?

I was then critisized for defending Fox at all costs because I didn't buy into that argument.

No, you were criticized, not for not buying in, but for attempting to excuse their behavior as the basis of a supposition for which you offered no evidence ..... and ultimately attempting to dismiss the argument you refer to as entirely frivolous, and without any possible merit whatsoever .....

It's you who has no evidence or supporting facts to back up your position - not the other way around.

I didn't jump to the conclusion because Fox News uses the wrong footage that it automatically means that they have some evil motive.

You ASSume that I (or others) jumped .....

Maybe it's a case that I (or others) are paying a bit more attention to Fox News' conduct over the years with regard to Dr. Paul ...

Or perhaps it's the case that we are not paying anymore attention, and are seeing the very same thing as you - but that we aren't quite as willing to bury our heads in the sand as you seem to be, and blithely dismiss yet another example of Fox News' very obvious and often quite hostile bias against Dr. Paul.

Can't speak for others, but I have witnessed this hostility - repeatedly, over a long period of time - on the part of a number of Fox News personalities: Sean Hannity, Chris Wallace, Carl Cameron all come to mind immediately just off the top of my head. Of course, now additionally, Bill Hemmer. There may be others as well.

I make no claim of conspiracy - but it is clear to me, that at least at some level, there appears to be an institutional bias against Dr. Paul at Fox News ....

Of course, that sorta kills the whole "Fair & Balanced" premise don't it ? ....

If my memory serves (and I could very well be incorrect on this) I believe you have defended Fox News in the past .... of course, brand-loyalty to whatever one's choice of beverage is, is to be expected I suppose ....

You really need to get rid of that JUMP TO CONCLUSION MAT

And you may wish to seriously consider disassociating yourself from the "See-no-evil" and "Hear-no-evil" contingents of the Three Monkeys Crowd:

 

[RLENT]

Yet you don't know yourself the exact facts,but pretend to know.

I don't pretend to know anything - I have however drawn a conclusion based on repeated personal observations of the behavior of the entity in question with regard to this matter.

That is significantly different than just throwing something out there based on nothing ..... or just pulling something out of one's *** ...

Thanks for the spelling correction spell check guy.

Anytime ..... arf arf .....

 

[muttly]

I don't pretend to know anything - I have however drawn a conclusion based on repeated personal observations of the behavior of the entity in question with regard to this matter.

That is significantly different than just throwing something out there based on nothing ..... or just pulling something out of one's *** ...


Anytime ..... arf arf .....

It's just when a person's argument is built on a deck of cards and it comes falling down there is only one card left to use....The spell check card. Ones argument is also reduced though even further by the use of zoo animals. Thanks though for all your scullduggery regarding to my defense of the Sinnesstter Fox News. You outed me. I Have defended Fox News in the past. What's even more astonishing is that I'm an expediter and secret Fox News operative extradinaire. Yes it's true. Since your exhaustive investigation has uncovered my secret cover I might as well expose more of Fox News's dirty tricks. I'm using a source by Media Matters.Witness are you out there? Don't let that organization fool you though. George Soros is the Dr. Evil of that operation. But here is the kicker. Are you listening? George Soros and Ruper Murdock are the same person. Yes it's true. Have you seen them both in the same place? No you haven't. If you somehow have a photo of both of them together it must be fudged or possibly a double was used to impersonate and take the place of either one. Anyway back to Media Matters. Here is another example of a Fox News dirty trick. They used an incorrect heading for a one Michael Brown. No not the much maligned former Fema director Michael Brown, but the democratic strategist and Obama friend Michael Brown. Fox News' America's News HQ chyron misidentified Democratic strategist Michael Brown as FEMA head "from 2003-2005" | Media Matters for America

Heres the connection: Michael Brown is a friend to Obama. Fox News used that incorrect heading to tarnish him and indirectly get to Obama. You see Fox isn't really out to get Ron Paul. Ssshhh. They really want to discredit Obama.

 

[Poorboy]

George Soros and Rupert Murdoch are the same person?