Wow! If that is true, that's ballsy.....even for Fox.
redytrk,
You really should try and come up with something new ... you know: push the envelope ...... expand the LOS standard response list to 5 or 10 or something ...Yeah, so what?
That is a rather simplistic view dontcha think ?Makes no difference in MY life. Don't watch FOX, ABC, NBC, CBS.
You bet.Much like that LEFT wing radical news views Sarah Palin?
Absolutely.They must REALLY FEAR her for all the "press" she receives.
You really should try and come up with something new ... you know: push the envelope ...... expand the response list to 5 or 10 or something ...
The is a rather simplistic view dontcha think ?
I mean, afterall ..... other people do watch the above organizations - even if you don't - and what they see and hear may influence them.
Unless you under the delusion that the decisions other people make has absolutely no effect on the world in which you live, I'd suggest that your position is not very a practical one (to say nothing of any ethical or moral aspects)
I did not vote for him and would not unless it came down to him or Obama, then I would.
Why not?
If you want someone who would actually fight for the constitution as you see it, he would be your guy.
One, I don't trust ANYONE who is NOW in office. If they have been in an elected office for more than one term they have to go. Second, I don't like his isolationist ideas, dangerous. (not that what we have now is any good) Third, he does not "inspire" me when he speaks. All the passion of dry toast. Not a leader in my eyes.
Yes, unfortunately, Ron Paul does come across as a drab, uninspiring isolationist. He has some interesting economic ideas. By all accounts Paul is known to be a good and decent man. 76 years old, perhaps a little tired and cranky. Nice guy, yes. Leader, no.
Actually that's not quite accurate - at least if you believe Vegas oddsmakers ..... true enough, it's long odds ... but not zero.He has zero chance of being elected regardless what the media does.
Well I agree with Aristole but will add that we may not have a choice with the isolationist thing. Our job isn't to police the rest of the world and by removing troops out of Korea, Middle East and especially Africa and Europe, won't make us any more unprotected as we are now. His point is to do the diplomatic thing while not having the same BS we have done in the past with our troops. Right now we have a senator acting as a diplomat, bad thing and crosses over into the constitutional issue with separation of powers.
A second thought I have to add, what does it matter if he inspires you, your not going off to war or asking to sacrifice something. The best presidents we have ever had were not the best speech makers and lacked inspirational flair. You should ask yourself this; do we really need a rock star president, a president who is concerned with polls or one who just wants to get the job done?
I'm with chef - I've voted for him in the past and I will again if he runs.
Additionally, I will be much more active in supporting him than I was in the past - both financially and working at the grassroots level.