FEMA Concentration Detention Camps

EASYTRADER

Expert Expediter
For a smart guy greg you aint too smart.

Requiring dealers to have licenses is an "infringement", and it all gun control laws are unconstitutional. Now I suppose you don't care because you "agree" with gun control laws.

Its one thing to say "we need laws regulating firearms" Its another thing to say those laws are constitutional. They clearly are not. Perhaps the Constitution should be ammended but we can't allow it to be ignored.

Words have meaning "infringed" was put there for a purpose. The country is being trashed because you people don't understand freedom. The government is out of control because you have No principles, all you care about is if you agree with something or not.

I'm sure you think the FDA should be arresting Amish for selling fresh milk to their neighbors too.

BTW - This is the first time I have read Koresh had an FFL. My dad had an FFL and I dealt with ATF all the time and they never did an early morning swat raid on our gunshop. If Koresh had an FFL the whole raid story is even more dubious than I thought it was to begin with.
 

EASYTRADER

Expert Expediter
You are in order to have an FFL you do have to allow the
ATF access to your facility that is part of the un constitutional law.

But I don't understand how that allows the ATF to kill 86 otherwise innocent people 17 of whom were children because D Koresh had an FFL and was a little nuty.

I fail to see the link. Perhaps if the ATF had just knocked on the door like they did at my dads store their wouldn't have been a shootout.

Did Randy Weaver have an FFL too or did they kill his unarmed wife, son and dog for extra credit? BTW he was exhonarated and the gov had to pay for wrongful death. Though no criminal charges were file on any of the officers or Janet Reno for that matter.

I guess they didnt want to pay out for Waco so they killed all the witnesses including the children then bulldozed the property.

Lol Nice gov your defending.
 

skyraider

Veteran Expediter
US Navy
You are in order to have an FFL you do have to allow the
ATF access to your facility that is part of the un constitutional law.

But I don't understand how that allows the ATF to kill 86 otherwise innocent people 17 of whom were children because D Koresh had an FFL and was a little nuty.

I fail to see the link. Perhaps if the ATF had just knocked on the door like they did at my dads store their wouldn't have been a shootout.

Did Randy Weaver have an FFL too or did they kill his unarmed wife, son and dog for extra credit? BTW he was exhonarated and the gov had to pay for wrongful death. Though no criminal charges were file on any of the officers or Janet Reno for that matter.

I guess they didnt want to pay out for Waco so they killed all the witnesses including the children then bulldozed the property.

Lol Nice gov your defending.

Yep, the Randy Weaver story alone is a real christian nation fowl up , not to mention Waco, but off to Walmart we go, it didnt affect most of us ,,oh well. :rolleyes:
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
For a smart guy greg you aint too smart.

Your opinion and it's alright because you don't talk to me directly or know what I know.

Requiring dealers to have licenses is an "infringement", and it all gun control laws are unconstitutional. Now I suppose you don't care because you "agree" with gun control laws.

The infringe is where?

The potential owner of the firearm is not infringed on by federal licensing of gun dealers which means the public isn't infringed on but the guy/gal who is making this a business and working with the manufacturer has to have a license in order to keep things within a set group of realistic regulations. The gun manufacturer is not doing this to provide a means to fulfill the second amendment but rather for a commercial venture, which means the dealer is also in it for the buck.

Its one thing to say "we need laws regulating firearms" Its another thing to say those laws are constitutional. They clearly are not. Perhaps the Constitution should be ammended but we can't allow it to be ignored.

Sorry but the need to regulate firearms comes from several issues within society, one such issue is we treat felons, those who are not supposed to have guns and are most likely to commit a crime with a gun as an equal to a citizen so hence the only way we can be sure that at least one factor is solved is to allow some regulating of firearms to happen within a reasonable limit. That limit should not be on a city level but could be on a state level. At minimal a public database containing the names, identification of the person and a picture of felons of all kinds with a reporting mechanism that forces dealers to use it when a sale is made. If a person isn't in the database, then the sale can be made with no record of the query. The bad thing that many will point out is this is in infringement of our basic rights but thats a really stupid argument when it is pointed out that a felon losses his/her rights under due process which includes the right to own a firearm and to vote.

Words have meaning "infringed" was put there for a purpose. The country is being trashed because you people don't understand freedom. The government is out of control because you have No principles, all you care about is if you agree with something or not.

Infringe in regards of the second amendment is not to infringe on the rights of the individual who has not been convicted of a crime nor has any issues that society believes that puts the public in danger - mental health issues.

I'm sure you think the FDA should be arresting Amish for selling fresh milk to their neighbors too.

Actually quite the opposite. I think the FDA should regulate the basic food stuff, as in dangerous ingredients and not in a political way (for example Stevia). The same goes for state regulators, I should be able to buy anything I want from anyone I want unless it is so damaging to myself or others around me which m does not include raw milk. Maybe buying nitroglycerin without a permit is reasonable but making and selling cheese to supplement my income and having the state tell me no is not reasonable.

Firearms are a different issue because unlike other countries, we don't look at victims rights as a mitigating factor in sentencing or in punishment. On top of that, we have a lot of stupid people running around doing a lot of stupid things and the absolute worst excuse we can use for limiting the use of things or forcing them to do something a certain way is for their own protection - seat belts, car seats and firearms are good examples.

BTW - This is the first time I have read Koresh had an FFL. My dad had an FFL and I dealt with ATF all the time and they never did an early morning swat raid on our gunshop. If Koresh had an FFL the whole raid story is even more dubious than I thought it was to begin with.

Well let me put it to you this way, the ATF acted as they did because of the circumstances that led up to an on site visit. They were warned about what could happen and they took precautions as would any law enforcement officers would. Shooting atf agents who are coming through a window after they gave a warning vacates any excuses that people make that excessive force was used.

You are in order to have an FFL you do have to allow the
ATF access to your facility that is part of the un constitutional law.

Nope not unconstitutional, it would be if you didn't have a choice but no one in the government forces you to become a gun dealer.

But I don't understand how that allows the ATF to kill 86 otherwise innocent people 17 of whom were children because D Koresh had an FFL and was a little nuty.

The ATF didn't kill 86 people, Koresh and his followers did. What's worst, spending time in jail for violating laws you agree to work by or holding people hostage and killing them later on?

I fail to see the link. Perhaps if the ATF had just knocked on the door like they did at my dads store their wouldn't have been a shootout.

I understand they gave Koresh warning but you got to ask yourself this, wouldn't they see the ATF and FBI arrive?

Did Randy Weaver have an FFL too or did they kill his unarmed wife, son and dog for extra credit? BTW he was exhonarated and the gov had to pay for wrongful death. Though no criminal charges were file on any of the officers or Janet Reno for that matter.

This is a completely different situation where Weaver should have been allowed to go after Reno, I think this was a true tragedy of not just the administration but the country and those who set off these events should spend time in jail or worst.

I guess they didnt want to pay out for Waco so they killed all the witnesses including the children then bulldozed the property.

Pay to whom?

There is a difference involved and if you want to change things, it starts with getting people in office who are willing to change things.

Lol Nice gov your defending.

I'm not defending any government, I am pointing out what the issue is with all of this, and why. If we continue to think that these things are just to limit our behavior without reasoning behind it or looking at the bigger picture, we will continue to have stupid laws forced on us by stupid people.
 
Last edited:

EASYTRADER

Expert Expediter
I suggest you break out your "Blacks Law" dictionary and see what the word "infringed" means.

You might even take a read through your constitution. You'd be surprised what it ACTUALLY sais.

The waco fire was caused by the propellant in the which cuaght fire by a kerosene lamp. The tear gas was being injected through the barrel of a tank in violation of posse comitatus.

So yeah the Government did cause the fire and killed all those people.

I don't think you actually know **** about what happened at waco.
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
Your funny, I know that they could have surrendered, they could have not held others hostage and they could have simply followed the laws.

It wasn't my decision to have the ATF go in there to find out why they wanted to find but neither was it my decision to have these people dealign in firearms.

Learn what circumstances that caused the feds to actually set in motion their "attack" on "innocent" people and you may be surprised at what you find. It isn't what a lot of people seem to make it out to be and if they would have not been in a threatening posture off the compound, they would not have attracted the attention they did.

Learn that Koresh was being investigated for sexually assualting children, having kids by children who were 12.
 

clcooper

Expert Expediter
""Actually quite the opposite. I think the FDA should regulate the basic food stuff, as in dangerous ingredients and not in a political way (for example Stevia). The same goes for state regulators, I should be able to buy anything I want from anyone I want unless it is so damaging to myself or others around me which m does not include raw milk. Maybe buying nitroglycerin without a permit is reasonable but making and selling cheese to supplement my income and having the state tell me no is not reasonable. """

Greg 1 of the few times i agree with you . i will only drink the milk from the milk tank . i have to dying of thirst.before i drink store bought milk .

why cant you buy Raw milk .
because only the farmer will make money off the milk . . but as we all should know there is farmers out there that will add stuff to the milk that can be dangerous to the drinker. not because they want us to get sick . but so they can make the milk last shelf life longer or to make 1 gallon into 2 gallons . it is called greed .


EASYTRADER i agree with you on the Constitution. but there was no drive bys .street gangs, automatic wepons. and the other nut cases back then like we have now . and wepons were needed more back then .then needed today . back then they needed the wepons to put food on the table every day . to keep the bears ,wolfs .away from the chickens. and then when the greedy white man ****ed off the Indians.

so i believe today we do need laws on guns . to keep the nut cases , gang banger, rapiests,etc. from haveing guns . YES outlaw guns then only the outlaw will have the guns .do guns kill people NO it is the people . i never once seen a gun walking down the street by itself . any time i seen a gun on the street it had a person in its pocket .
i do believe if you want to own a automatic you should have some sort of permit ,license. i do believe they should be able to check if you are able to own a gun too . back ground checks . yes it is a pain in the *** for the good guys . but do you really want a known bad
guy to have a gun ???
can the checks be done in a better way YES we have the technology to make it better .
do i own guns yes i do 6 of them . and like to have some more .

when i said Waco i never meant what happened that day . i meant was because how and why the people followed David .
 

EASYTRADER

Expert Expediter
Sexual assualt on a minor is a state crime not a federal one so the ATF had no jurisdiction there. The waco sheriff should have handled it if there were crimes against persons taking place.

Like I said most americans have no idea how our government is supposed to work because it hasn't worked right since the Hoover administration.

Bad people with guns should be killed by good people with guns, not by cops. Learn to stand up for yourself. Americans are all a bunch of lilly livered wimps.
 

EASYTRADER

Expert Expediter
I know you guys all know his but the Battle at Lexington & Concord was farmers defending themselves from the Brittish ATF who came to seize their firearms in voilation of common law and the magna carta. Our revolution went kinetic over firearm seizures or attempted seizures anyway. The brittish got their azz_s kicked all the way back to boston that day.

Shame on you guys for trashing your birthright because of fear.

Those who would exchange freedom for security deserve neither freedom nor security.

I read the stuff you guys write and its not surprising the countries going down the flusher. The lack of understanding of basic American values is appalling. You sound like a bunch of frenchmen!
 

EASYTRADER

Expert Expediter
I under stand now what Jesus meant when he said "cast not your pearls amounge the swine"

Posted with my Droid EO Forum App
 

skyraider

Veteran Expediter
US Navy
I under stand now what Jesus meant when he said "cast not your pearls amounge the swine"

Posted with my Droid EO Forum App

Hey Easytrader, nice to see a Bible verse in here. You are a brave person and you stand for the USA. Glad your here. Amen.
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
Koresh was guilty of NOTHING. He was an innocent man under the law. I don't know what he may have done or did not do. He never made it to court. Would he have been convicted of a crime? Maybe, maybe not. We will never know.

The Federal government is very much out of control. They are pushing their slimy fingers into our lives more and more everyday. They are ignoring States rights, and more importantly, Individual rights. They need reined in. They need to know their place and live within those bounds. They need to get out of our faces.
 

skyraider

Veteran Expediter
US Navy
Koresh was guilty of NOTHING. He was an innocent man under the law. I don't know what he may have done or did not do. He never made it to court. Would he have been convicted of a crime? Maybe, maybe not. We will never know.

The Federal government is very much out of control. They are pushing their slimy fingers into our lives more and more everyday. They are ignoring States rights, and more importantly, Individual rights. They need reined in. They need to know their place and live within those bounds. They need to get out of our faces.

Unfortunately we voted in those slimy fingers.
 

greg334

Veteran Expediter
Koresh was guilty of NOTHING. He was an innocent man under the law. I don't know what he may have done or did not do. He never made it to court. Would he have been convicted of a crime? Maybe, maybe not. We will never know.

So you condone people who are claiming to be Jesus and raping children?

When women and children escaped the compound and reported what happened to them, they were lying?

There is no evidence that Bin Laden actually killed anyone but we went after him. So should we have a double standard when it comes to how we investigate things based on our slanted idea of the rules of evidence?

The Federal government is very much out of control. They are pushing their slimy fingers into our lives more and more everyday. They are ignoring States rights, and more importantly, Individual rights. They need reined in. They need to know their place and live within those bounds. They need to get out of our faces.

BUT their slimy fingers are our fellow citizens who we elect to represent us. If we allow this to continue, are they not really representing us the way the majority of people who they represent want them to represent us?

The one thing that I can't understand with people who keep saying all of this stuff is why are they not uniting and forcing the congress or at least the states to fight for an amendment to both repeal the 17th amendment and to allow recalls on all levels of government?
 

layoutshooter

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
"So you condone people who are claiming to be Jesus and raping children?

When women and children escaped the compound and reported what happened to them, they were lying? "



I never said I condoned anything. All I said is that, under our Constitution, he was not guilty of anything. Were those people who escaped lying? I have no idea. I can say for sure that he was never afforded the right to cross examine or face his accusers.

It was also not a Federal Case. It should have been handled by Texas.
 

EASYTRADER

Expert Expediter
Layout,
Exactly my point. There was no Federal Jurisdiction for any of the "Crimes" he was accused of. By the way I'm sure he was guilty of poligamy, but that's not Federal. Like you said he never got his day in court.

As for any ATF involvement like I said before all gun laws in the US are unconstitutional. So he gets a pass on any of those guilty or not.

Of course we will never know since he bled to death and any non-government witness was conveietly burned to death. Even the children which these pinko liberals claim to so concerned about.
 

EASYTRADER

Expert Expediter
Greg,

Is claiming to be Jesus a Death Penalty offense. I think that would fall under the establishment cluase?

Posted with my Droid EO Forum App
 
Top