We are team drivers for fedex and were on a load to NM when we were informed by our owner operators to return the truck because they were calling in their fleet. ...Any suggestions?
I had planned to stay off the Open Forum until Aug 1 but cases like this get my blood boiling.
Aval650, my EO mail box is filled to overflowing and inbound messages are rejected. Diane and I invite you to contact us by normal e-mail (follow the e-mail link on
this page). If you wish, we will donate to OOIDA a membership in your name, thereby making you a member. You will only need to contact them to give them your particulars. We don't need your personal information, only your name so we can designate the membership.
I would dearly love to write an article about bad fleet owners but these stories always turn out the same. If the victim fights back, the fleet owners cave to pressure before public court documents go on record, so when someone like me wants to write a story that includes names, contract provisions, claims, counter-claims, etc., there are no solid facts to state; only he-said, she-said stuff that exposes a writer to lible charges or suits if published. Often, the driver caves too and the "settlement" worked out by the fleet owner includes a gag order that keeps the victim from saying anything more.
If I had affidavits (statements made under oath) and court findings in hand, I could write things up loud and clear without fear of retaliation from the fleet owner in question. There is no prohibition against telling the truth and having public-record, court documents in hand would provide all the power I would need to push back against any threat of a lible suit.
EO may not be willing to publish such a story, even if it was documented as described above, but I have other outlets and would proceed.
I hate to see bad fleet owners take advantage of drivers over and over again, but they do so again and again because drivers do not fight back to the point where the fleet owner can be exposed. That is often because they lack the skills, the means, the will or all three.
Newbies listen up! There are fleet owners out there who intend to screw you from the moment you answer their ad. They are smooth talkers and highly skilled in their craft. They will get you off to a good start to get the cash flow going and then spring the trap, sometimes waiting to do so until you are far from home and less able to fight back.
There are others who have good hearts but are terrible business people, and when their mistakes catch up with them, the financial pressures push them over the ethical edge and motivate them to put their interests ahead of the well-intended promises they once made to their drivers.
I have also seen it happen where money corrupts fleet owners who never saw it coming. One way or another, they find their way into the fleet owner business and, with good intentions, do the best they know how to do. But as the money starts to flow, it gets to them and changes them. Actually, they did not change a bit. It's just that they had never had so much money flow through their hands before and had never had such an opportunity to take an ethical stand and do the right thing. They fail the test and start keeping the money for themselves that legally and morally belongs to the drivers who earned it.
It is not a conscious decision but small temptations are given into and rationalized. Thus begins the downward slide.
Honest drivers sometimes fail to see these bad fleet owners coming because they do not recognize the behavior. It is so far away from how they would think to treat someone else that they get blindsided as the negative situation develops.