Actually I anticipated the intelligent people to read the idiot's comments about having guns in kindergarten and machine guns in bars and other equally ridiculous comments without having to spell it all out in detail. I also counted on certain "special" people to make certain expected comments. Right on both counts.
If you buy into even half of the crap the fuher says, you have the brain capacity of a vegetable.
Bob Wolf
All true. . . But that doesn't negate the fact that Obama is correct in his statement . . ."In some neighborhoods it is easier to buy guns than books or vegetables."If it is difficult to buy books or vegetables in a neighborhood, chances are it's because the crime rate is so high that shopkeepers feel unsafe in opening a store in that particular neighborhood. Maybe there is little or no demand for books or vegetables in a violent neighborhood. Maybe if residents behaved well and respected shopkeepers, then ordinary items would be available for sale.
All true. . . But that doesn't negate the fact that Obama is correct in his statement . . ."In some neighborhoods it is easier to buy guns than books or vegetables."
Why some can not accept the statement instead of trying to spin it in other directions is beyond me.
All true. . . But that doesn't negate the fact that Obama is correct in his statement . . ."In some neighborhoods it is easier to buy guns than books or vegetables."
Why some can not accept the statement instead of trying to spin it in other directions is beyond me.
If it is difficult to buy books or vegetables in a neighborhood, chances are it's because the crime rate is so high that shopkeepers feel unsafe in opening a store in that particular neighborhood. Maybe there is little or no demand for books or vegetables in a violent neighborhood. Maybe if residents behaved well and respected shopkeepers, then ordinary items would be available for sale.
Please don't insult them by saying it's all in their head.
They have amply proven time and again that there is nothing in their heads.
Amen, does anyone remember Ferguson Mo. ?If it is difficult to buy books or vegetables in a neighborhood, chances are it's because the crime rate is so high that shopkeepers feel unsafe in opening a store in that particular neighborhood. Maybe there is little or no demand for books or vegetables in a violent neighborhood. Maybe if residents behaved well and respected shopkeepers, then ordinary items would be available for sale.
Because it's based on a false premise. If state, local and federal laws were being properly enforced in these neighborhoods it would be easier to by books and vegetables than to legally purchase a gun. In these areas to which he refers, it's probably easier to steal books and vegetables than it is to purchase a gun.All true. . . But that doesn't negate the fact that Obama is correct in his statement . . ."In some neighborhoods it is easier to buy guns than books or vegetables."
Why some can not accept the statement instead of trying to spin it in other directions is beyond me.
Taken by itself, the vegetables/guns statement is factual. His larger point - that his proposed gun control legislation would stop the violence and heal these neighborhoods - is not. His agenda is to impose gun control one way or another. Keep in mind the recent ammo ban the BATF announced on Feb 13. Law abiding citizens are being deprived of their 2d amendment rights while criminals continue business as usual.“It is hard to reduce the easy availability of guns,” Obama complained during a town hall meeting at South Carolina’s Benedict College.
“As long as you can go on into some neighborhoods, and it’s easier for you to buy a firearm than it is for you to buy a book, there are neighborhoods where it’s easier for you to buy a handgun and clips than it is for you to buy a fresh vegetable,” Obama continued. “As long as that’s the case, we’re going to continue to see unnecessary violence.”
That sounds like a good premise some ought to learn to apply to foreign policy.The salient question is " why are guns easier to buy?'" Rather than looking outward for excusemaking, the residents might want to confront decades of self-defeating behavior.
Here's his statement (in part - emphasis mine):
Taken by itself, the vegetables/guns statement is factual. His larger point - that his proposed gun control legislation would stop the violence and heal these neighborhoods - is not. His agenda is to impose gun control one way or another. Keep in mind the recent ammo ban the BATF announced on Feb 13. Law abiding citizens are being deprived of their 2d amendment rights while criminals continue business as usual.