The higher tolls are in reality just ANOTHER tax on truckers. Those who passed those tolls know darn will that the majority of those shipping products are NOT going to pay overtime or shift premiums to their workers to load and unload after normal business hours. SO, they pass these "feel good" tolls to show the people that they care, AND, they can soak the truckers, many of them from out of state, for even MORE money. Don't believe for one second that these "congestion tolls" have ANYTHING to do with reducing congestion.
With all due respect, that's hogwash. The congestion pricing is not always an increase in tolls, [in some places/times it's a decrease for travelling during off peak times], and it is having a positive effect, according to actual measurements.
One interesting note: many truck drivers reported being unable to take advantage of the lower cost of tolls to enter NYC because they could not adjust their delivery times. In some cases, [retail & restaurants come to mind] that's an unavoidable truth. Still, in many of the places we deliver, the arrival time could be changed without significant harm - it happens all the time, whether due to delays enroute or at the dock, but no one seems to be considering it.
Old habits die hard, but how else do we progress?
Links?
Just read the Wiki article on congestion pricing, [as I just did], and follow the links at the bottom of the page as appropriate.
As somebody is fond of saying, "consider it homework, then get back to me".
Increased fuel costs are not the customers' fault but we charge for those in the form of a fuel surcharge. Tolls are not the customers' fault but we charge for those by building them into the per-mile rate quoted for the run. Detention may or may not be the customers' fault but we charge for it in the form of detention time.
You are correct that many rush hour delays could be easily avoided if the shippers and consignees scheduled loads to avoid them. In that regard, a C-time charge might be better named, better expelained to the customers and more uniformially charged if it was called a congestion surcharge. If such a charge existed, customers would indeed pay more attention to scheduling their pick-ups and deliveries to avoid rush hours.
Congestion charges exist now in the form of higher tolls charged during prime time.
London, England, has a congestion charge zone in which a fee is charged to most motor vehicles that are operating between 7 a.m. and 6 p.m. M-F. It is enforced by plate number recognition technology.
A congestion tax was once proposed for New York City (cars $8.00, trucks $21.00) but the measure failed. City taxes for congestion are designed as a money grab, first of all, and presented as an environmental and traffic reduction measure.
A congestion charge added by transportation companies is something different. It would compensate the drivers and equipment providers for the additional costs of operating in a congested environment, and, most importantly, for the value of the driver's time that is otherwise lost to congestion.
The devil is in the details and actually charging such a fee based on congestion may be difficult. A 20 percent price markup imposed as a Northeast regional surcharge may be easier to do.
In effect, Diane and I are doing it now, staying out of the region unless the loads pay enough. And by enough I do not mean a good rate per mile. I mean enough money to pay for all tolls and all time wasted in the area, on top of a good rate per mile.
For example, we don't even think of going into the New York City area for pick-ups and deliveries on loads that pay less than $5,000. And if we do go in, we don't let toll pay offset any other pay. Toll pay is a pass-through designed to protect our profit margin.
I had lots of time to think about this yesterday as we spent six hours (SIX HOURS!) creeping through East Coast rush hour traffic and the load paid only $1.80 per mile. It picked up in CT, took us through New York City, across the GW Bridge and eventually delivered early this morning in North Carolina.
We took that load at that rate because it met a directional-dispatch need. We need to be in Florida soon for HAZMAT training. With that in mind, it was a delight to receive this load offer that took us from CT to NC, but it totally sucked to creep along for six hours at $1.80 a mile.
I was talking with a big-rig driver today and this topic came up. He said it is common at his company for its contractors to ask for an additional $500 for any trip into and out of Long Island. They ask and the amount is readily agreed to, he said.
I thought you were getting the $500 extra every trip. That would explain two things. Why you haven't lost your mind ...
Next time you are running like that I suggestion listening to 1010 wins of the AM dial or XM traffic than you can get an idea of which way you should go. I don't want to be harsh but all you people do is post how miserable you are in northeast or NYC traffic but yet continue to take the same approach.
How is it i've been running this area my entire career & haven't lost my mind yet? It's because I know my way around. So next time you are in this situation, bail out of 95 south jump on 287/87 N/E take that over the Tapenzee bridge, no toll in that direction follow that to 287/rt 17s into NJ than jump on 17 South & make your way back to 95 south NJTP.
The 38 extra miles it is as opposed to staying on 95 & going though the Bronx to the GWB but it's sure worth it & it's not going to take 6 hours. Not to mention all the trees that will be spared being made into tissues that you won't need anymore from the lack of crying about NYC traffic.
You're welcome.
Next time you are running like that I suggestion listening to 1010 wins of the AM dial or XM traffic than you can get an idea of which way you should go. I don't want to be harsh but all you people do is post how miserable you are in northeast or NYC traffic but yet continue to take the same approach.
Out od Long Island? What part of he island are they running? So just to to JFK in Quenns which is NYC they want another $500 & get it. Please PLEASE post the name of this company so I can sign on with them.
no..they'll cry about the the 38 extra miles and want paid for that too...
Maybe people change once it becomes a job and not an adventure.
You are the main advocate here on EO of "Drive less, make more." You don't do that by giving away the miles you dive.
Hey Deville, whatcha gonna do when they rebuild the Tap in 2014 & following? For now, though, you are absolutely correct, although I'd be tempted to run 287 a longer way, such as down to 80 to grab 280, or even all the way down to grab the pike at Metuchen. Or is that too far out around?
Sent from my SCH-I110 using EO Forums mobile app