I was just messing with ya. I decided you probably needed it.
Well in that case it's OK!
I was just messing with ya. I decided you probably needed it.
Oh yes ... which is undoubtedly why we adopted JIT ("just in time") inventory control/manufacturing ... which they honed to a fine art ...Their ways can never work here.
That's not really a cultural thing (the context of LOS' post), but more of a business model thing.Oh yes ... which is undoubtedly why we adopted JIT ("just in time") inventory control/manufacturing ... which they honed to a fine art ...
True ... but it's just possible that business practices might be a reflection of broader cultural values.That's not really a cultural thing (the context of LOS' post), but more of a business model thing.
True ... but it's just possible that business practices might be a reflection of broader cultural values.
It's possible, but JIT inventory doesn't seem to fit into that context. If it did, then JIT, or Lean Manufacturing, would only work in certain cultural paradigms. The fact that it works in all cultures would indicate that it's not culture based, but business based.
The Toyota system was based on the Ford system, but the Ford system was not sustainable in post-war Japan (or for very long in post-war America). It held on in America for as long as it did only because of cultural attitudes in the mindset held over from the Great Depression. It allowed auto manufacturers to take advantage of workers in harsh ways. But they were unsustainable in a world market, and Japan knew it.
It was Japan's culture (and the fact that they were starting from scratch) that allowed them to hone it to a fine art, but it wasn't the culture that created it. While American manufacturing was more concerned with processes (Bessemer, what each worker did, how each worker process worked together, etc.), Japan took the American ideas largely ignored by American manufactures, like Motion Studies and process charting, including value added processes that occurred in between or outside the worker processes, and implemented them as part of a whole manufacturing concept. It was more efficient and cost effective, rather than a cultural reflection.
US manufactures saw that, and eventually copied it, but initially only copied the superficial aspects of Lean Manufacturing, and failed. What they did was, in effect, copy one sentence out of context and tried to apply it to something else for their own purposes.
I understand what you are saying, but I don't think that's necessarily true.It's possible, but JIT inventory doesn't seem to fit into that context. If it did, then JIT, or Lean Manufacturing, would only work in certain cultural paradigms. The fact that it works in all cultures would indicate that it's not culture based, but business based.
Well, no, it's not necessarily true, as there are usually exceptions to most things, but it's generally true. Layout's statement was true, in the general context, as Japanese and American cultures are so different that you can't just take the ways of one culture and plop them into the other and have them work.I understand what you are saying, but I don't think that's necessarily true.
They can thank Bill Deming for Statistical Process Analysis. He went to Chrysler, Ford and GM with it before he went to Japan. The rest is history. One more time the big 3 knew better... They should've been liquidated... GM and Mopar anyway.
Deming took his ideas to Japan because the Big 3 [fatuous arrogant morons] told him to, "Made in Japan" being then synonymous with cheap throwaway junk. They said Japan needed help improving quality, not us - they really believed they'd always have a captive market for whatever they built, right? No need to improve quality, we're selling plenty! [And people blame the unions for everything]
Rebuffed and [probably] stung, Deming took it to Japan, where the culture of politeness required them to listen without snickering when he said he could turn their reputation around in 3 years. He did it in two. [I'm going on memory with that - but the fact is he delivered what he promised, and in much less time than he expected.]
It wouldn't be half so infuriating if the American auto manufacturers had learned from the experience, but they're still arrogant morons, IMO. It's downright embarrassing.
Deming took his ideas to Japan because the Big 3 [fatuous arrogant morons] told him to, "Made in Japan" being then synonymous with cheap throwaway junk. They said Japan needed help improving quality, not us - they really believed they'd always have a captive market for whatever they built, right? No need to improve quality, we're selling plenty! [And people blame the unions for everything]
Rebuffed and [probably] stung, Deming took it to Japan, where the culture of politeness required them to listen without snickering when he said he could turn their reputation around in 3 years. He did it in two. [I'm going on memory with that - but the fact is he delivered what he promised, and in much less time than he expected.]
It wouldn't be half so infuriating if the American auto manufacturers had learned from the experience, but they're still arrogant morons, IMO. It's downright embarrassing.
"Queue the lynchmobs - I'm about to say that capitalism isn't serving our needs as well as we'd like. "
What system out there is working better? How well has Marxism worked in the Soviet Union, OH WAIT, there IS no Soviet Union any longer. China is heading for a crash. Almost, if not all, of the world's countries are in more debt than we are and MOST of our uncovered debt is in socialist programs. What's your solution?
And don't get on the LynchMob they are VERY good people. I know George quite well, he makes great goose calls. Of course they ARE used for fun, which the socialists are trying to outlaw!
LYNCH MOB CALLS (LMC) - GOOSE CALLS - DUCK CALLS - BROTHERHOOD
China is not heading for a crash. China executed a "soft landing" and is trying desperately to reel their economy in as it tends to overheat which creates it's own set of problems.
Japan was kicking our butts pretty well and sometime around 1990 or 1991 we convinced them that their currency was too undervalued and they needed to correct that. And then they plunged into the "lost decade" and then another lost decade. Hope Abenomics will turn them around. Note that we're trying the exact same attack against China but they ain't buying it. They saw Japan's blunder and they'll do just enough to appease us if necessary but no more.
My post was intended to be light-hearted I am serious when I say that capitalism needs to be controlled a little. The invisible hand of the market doesn't always do it's job. Witness the "Minksy Moment" we just went through with our economy. Where was the invisible hand of the market when it came to housing prices? Or credit default swaps? Or S&P or Moody's AAA ratings for anything they didn't understand?
From this post I can make a couple of guesses. One, you don't have a very good understanding of the Japanese culture.
Do you dispute what I wrote that the Japanese culture required politeness to guests?
Two you don't understand how BOTH the unions AND the companies HERE, in our culture, would, first, not like "JIT", and second, how BOTH would cause the problems we have with "JIT" here, which led to the birth of the expediting industry.
Clearly, you don't understand either what Deming offered, or what I wrote, because it wasn't about JIT, and no one even considered what the union would like. [As if they have any real choice, lol] Deming's focus was on achieving the highest quality the first time every action was performed. Instead of buying from the lowest bidder, inspecting every incoming part & component, sorting into acceptable, acceptable with in house rework, and unacceptable, return to vendor, Deming's system requires choosing the vendor who could consistently produce the quality required. The Big 3 bosses saw how much more they'd have to pay vendors [and turn their whole system upside down], and never considered how much they might save in the long [and not very long, either] run.
"JIT" works better in Japan DUE to their culture, nothing to do with snickering, and does not work as will here, due to OUR culture, snickering or not. It is FAR more complicated than that, and it's roots go back for thousands of years, in BOTH cultures. It is not as easy to change as some seem to believe it is.
This ^ has nothing to do with what I wrote [as usual], but now that you mention it, the Japanese had no problem changing their manufacturing process to follow Deming's plan.
The vast majorit of American's, and I would guess yourself included, would be very reluctant to live under the cultural restrictions that the Japanese are quite happy in.
Yes ... and while you're watching just remember that the individual that wrote the above said - IIRC - that Obama would be rounding up and interning his enemies in prison camps within a couple months after the election ...Watch for China to crash. I am not talking a currency. Europe is not far behind.
Again: WTH does that have to do with anything?! Are you implying that my comment about the culture of politeness indicates a desire to live under the same cultural restrictions as the Japanese?
When you 'connect the dots', I gotta wonder how you come up with a snail from an outline of a camel....
The invisible hand of the market doesn't always do it's job.
True, which is why vehicles such as "crypto currencies" like Bitcoin and Litecoin are on the rise. They cannot be manipulated. Their value is what it is. Unfettered, global and unshakable, their value is dictated 100% by the free market. Current world currencies could easily end up obsolete.