What is really hypocritical is a bunch of men trying to make decisions for women...
Depends on which men they are. What if that man is the FATHER in question. How come he would have no say over life of his offspring?
What is really hypocritical is a bunch of men trying to make decisions for women...
Uhm, "which men THEY are" and "THAT man is THE father" are two very different contexts. One is plural and general, the other is singular and specific. One man having a say about his offspring is very, very different from a group of men wanting to have a say about offspring they have absolutely nothing to do with.Depends on which men they are. What if that man is the FATHER in question. How come he would have no say over life of his offspring?
Uhm, "which men THEY are" and "THAT man is THE father" are two very different contexts. One is plural and general, the other is singular and specific. One man having a say about his offspring is very, very different from a group of men wanting to have a say about offspring they have absolutely nothing to do with.
Am speaking of all you guys in here....
That's not what I meant .... I was pointing at old farts like you. Leo and monger
Total hypocrisy from a total moron but that's to be expected from leftist idiots like Ms. Elder.
Elders was born in poor, rural Arkansas. She and her seven siblings worked in cotton fields with their sharecropper parents. When she was 15, Elders won a scholarship to Philander Smith College, an all-black school in Little Rock. She earned a bachelor's degree in 1952 and entered the army, where she studied physical therapy. She enrolled in the University of Arkansas Medical School (UAMS) and received a M.D. in 1960, one of three minority students to do so. She married Oliver Elders that year. She served as chief pediatric resident at the University of Arkansas Medical Center. She continued her education, receiving an M.S. in biochemistry from UAMS in 1967. Elders became an expert in pediatric diabetes and accepted a post on the UAMS faculty in 1971.
Sure would be nice to see the same passion for the thousands of children killed every week in our cities.I'm not making decisions for women, I'm speaking on behalf of innocents who are unable to speak for themselves and subject to murder before they achieve that ability.
Am speaking of all you guys in here....
We have 545 people, hellbent on making decisions for us. People in here don't have that power.
Uh, oh. That's a setup for an ad hominem logical fallacy waiting to happen. Somebody with three degrees should know that. <snort>Oh, I don't know about that. Full scholarship at 15 years of age and 3 college degrees compared to truck driving school makes it questionable who should be calling whom a moron and an idiot.
What exactly are your credentials in this debate? Please don't say life experience.
By the courts and Child Protective Services, which is legalized busy-bodying, yes.What about the father's of minor girls? Have their parental rights been taken from them by the courts?
Of course he has rights. Significant rights, in fact.What about the father of an soon to be baby? Any rights? Don't think so.
The same thing applies - they should mind their own business, unless they're the one who is pregnant, or the one who got her pregnant. The term "pro-life" should not be synonymous with "pro you'll do as I say."There are also just as many women who are pro-life as men. What about a group of women saying what these men are saying?
It never is.It is not as simple as snip snip.
We have 545 people, hellbent on making decisions for us. People in here don't have that power.
No, you don't speak for all us guys in here. You may THINK you do, but you don't.
OntarioVanManAm speaking of all you guys in here....
What is really hypocritical is a bunch of men trying to make decisions for women...