Tennesseahawk
Veteran Expediter
RE: American Trucking Associations pushed HOS regs
Chuckwagon wrote:
>If you want the same as the guy at Burger King - then go
>work at Burger King!
Try reading my post, instead of putting words in my mouth. I want the pay increase with inflation increase... the same as the guy at Burger King. I didn't say I wanted to flip burgers, smart guy.
>If you want to improve your situation in this industry -
>then get out of the same ole' but do nothing about it
>attitude some many of the 'old time veterans' have on this
>site.
You've been here since 9-6-06 and you think you know everything that goes on? Damm you're good!
>Listen, I agree the ATA and the feds shake hands everyday,
>and one of the missions of the ATA is to line the pockets of
>their membership companies. While we might not like what the
>ATA does, if the OOIDA was able to do the same for us
>expeditors, we wouldn't be sitting around bitching about it
>though.
So which bandwagon are you on now? Join OOIDA or back to the Start a Union speech? It's getting a little old.
>Sure we want a fair shake - but we have been sitting here in
>this expediting world we live in for many years stuck in the
>same mindset that nothing will change, we're always going to
>get screwed, everyone is out to put us out of business, etc.
The expediting world is a small part of the trucking world. In order to get what changes we want, things have to change in trucking. Good luck with that!
>Now, we can either continue this long standing tradition of
>ignorance or we can take a new approach and build our own
>organization - our own force - to address OUR needs and
>concerns. Or we can just sit back and await our slow and
>painful death of our own segment of the trucking industry,
>allowing the ATA to force us out of the business in the
>political bullsh** methods they use.
The ATA isn't worried about expediting as much as they are O/O carriers (other than their own). I believe O/O otr and ltl carriers are expediting's closest allies. They have to be on board of any changes we want to make.
>And Hawk, if you want to block a highway, a ramp, a loading
>dock, or whatever, to prove that the expediting driver needs
>to be heard, that we are a vital segment of working America
>- let me know and we can 'organize' one hell of a showing!
Again... I'm not worried about expediting. Take care of trucking in general, and expediting will fall in line soon afterwards. There's plenty of talk about this or that to get things to change, but you can't get truckers to agree. Even if you did, their $2000/mo truck payments demands they get out and run... regardless of what the long term effect of a short term sitdown may cause. Sorry... but some of these truckers are dumb as dirt. They'll want nothing more than to take advantage of a trucking slowdown and let everyone else do the dirty work to fix the trucking situation.
Chuck... your heart may be in the right place, but you need to do some research before you spout out solutions. You're all over the place on this matter.
"If I claim to be a wise man, it surely means that I don't know." - Kansas
Chuckwagon wrote:
>If you want the same as the guy at Burger King - then go
>work at Burger King!
Try reading my post, instead of putting words in my mouth. I want the pay increase with inflation increase... the same as the guy at Burger King. I didn't say I wanted to flip burgers, smart guy.
>If you want to improve your situation in this industry -
>then get out of the same ole' but do nothing about it
>attitude some many of the 'old time veterans' have on this
>site.
You've been here since 9-6-06 and you think you know everything that goes on? Damm you're good!
>Listen, I agree the ATA and the feds shake hands everyday,
>and one of the missions of the ATA is to line the pockets of
>their membership companies. While we might not like what the
>ATA does, if the OOIDA was able to do the same for us
>expeditors, we wouldn't be sitting around bitching about it
>though.
So which bandwagon are you on now? Join OOIDA or back to the Start a Union speech? It's getting a little old.
>Sure we want a fair shake - but we have been sitting here in
>this expediting world we live in for many years stuck in the
>same mindset that nothing will change, we're always going to
>get screwed, everyone is out to put us out of business, etc.
The expediting world is a small part of the trucking world. In order to get what changes we want, things have to change in trucking. Good luck with that!
>Now, we can either continue this long standing tradition of
>ignorance or we can take a new approach and build our own
>organization - our own force - to address OUR needs and
>concerns. Or we can just sit back and await our slow and
>painful death of our own segment of the trucking industry,
>allowing the ATA to force us out of the business in the
>political bullsh** methods they use.
The ATA isn't worried about expediting as much as they are O/O carriers (other than their own). I believe O/O otr and ltl carriers are expediting's closest allies. They have to be on board of any changes we want to make.
>And Hawk, if you want to block a highway, a ramp, a loading
>dock, or whatever, to prove that the expediting driver needs
>to be heard, that we are a vital segment of working America
>- let me know and we can 'organize' one hell of a showing!
Again... I'm not worried about expediting. Take care of trucking in general, and expediting will fall in line soon afterwards. There's plenty of talk about this or that to get things to change, but you can't get truckers to agree. Even if you did, their $2000/mo truck payments demands they get out and run... regardless of what the long term effect of a short term sitdown may cause. Sorry... but some of these truckers are dumb as dirt. They'll want nothing more than to take advantage of a trucking slowdown and let everyone else do the dirty work to fix the trucking situation.
Chuck... your heart may be in the right place, but you need to do some research before you spout out solutions. You're all over the place on this matter.
"If I claim to be a wise man, it surely means that I don't know." - Kansas