Search results

That is correct. You sure that it wasn't Andy that took the call and actually Barney that showed up, rather than Andy ? The police - and I can tell you this from personal experience - are very rarely holders of a law degree. Their knowledge is generally quite limited on the law ... most often...

But apparently there was some reason to ommit a portion of what she was advised them to do in your subsequent statement. Fair point. That his claim, yes. Fair points ... but largely irrelevant in the overall scheme of things. Not really (see below). Yes I am ... There are significant...

Stop right there ... that isn't what she told them to do. You being selective ... and leaving out information. That creates a distorted picture. Here's what she actually said: "We'd like you to be aware of a situation at our Fluvanna County campaign office. There is a Trump supporter who has...

Probably all part of the Hillary/Obama conspiracy ... couldn't possibly have anything to do with O'Keefe's own prior conduct.

But you don't know that that (conjuring up boogeymen in their heads) was what was actually done ... or any idea of the particular history of the people involved. IOW: the above sounds like speculation on your part. Without knowing the history of the individuals involved, you have no way of...

Ahhh ... I see ... So if they have an agenda and aren't objective, then you do have a problem with it. Even if ... (wait for it) ... they claim to be "Fair and Balanced" ?

Another follow-on prediction coming off the last (mebbe humorous ... or not) set: 1. Depending on which way things seem to be heading, Mitch McConnell starts thinking that having someone who at least appears to be somewhat moderate (that would be ... ahhh ... one Merrick Garland) might just be...

So ... you basically don't have an issue with journalists being "activists" and operating under false pretenses ... as long as it's the (political) flavor of "activism" that you like ?

Well, I guess we could always reinstitute the Fairness Doctrine ...

More predictions aka "The Apocalypse Doomsday Scenario" (not really ... it's actually humor ...) 1. Clinton wins in a landslide ... including Texas (a squeaker) 2. The D's take the Senate. 3. For the next Supreme Court Justice Preznit Hillz nominates ... (wait for it) ... Barry Bamz ... who...

So ... he is a journalist then. Essentially, what you seem to be saying is that he's seeking to emulate the MSM ... Which, of course, is somewhat ironic.

Or mebbe O'Keefe is stringing bits and pieces of footage together - while willfully omitting parts that are exculpatory or would conflict with his chosen narrative, depriving the viewer of the full context - to construct a (less than honest) narrative of his own choosing. We do, after all, have...

Looks like lotsa edits to me ... wonder what the missing footage shows ? Not a real stretch to imagine that Junior may run afoul of the law once again ...

BTW ... it looks like you might have an anti-Hillary, anti-DNC "agenda" ... lol ...

Choice closing line from the article: "According to O’Keefe, his own lawyers tell him there’s strong evidence here of criminality." If past is in any way prologue, hopefully they didn't advise him that said criminality was, in fact, his ...

Yeah ... largely by folks who aren't at all in the position that those that were in the campaign office were in ... #empathy You mean like the false equivalency some employ regarding Muslim refugees and immigrants ? Probably just need some "extreme vetting" ... YUGE !

Caveat Emptor ...

I thought you were complaining about "the media" ...

Judging by his Twitter feed, I don't think "voter fraud!" means what he thinks it means ...

Not happy with the media's coverage or conduct ? Then build your own ... If you are really truly going for "Fair and Balanced" though, then I'd suggest taking a pass on candidate fluffers like Hannity ...