Search results

Seems so ...

I certainly am not claiming that. Those are explanations for why video (such as you imagine may exist) may not actually exist to much extent, at least in any useable form. Not excuses. Wait ... who was President when that occurred ? Are you saying Trump is part of the Left ... because...

Nope. And Trump's own Sec Def intimated as much (quoted) On your part maybe ... :tearsofjoy:

It's just another way of asking: "What is your point ?" (in relation to my post which you were replying to) Nothing that you posted conflicts with or refutes my original post. BTW - just an FYI - I'm more inclined to give credence to a quote of the actual words of DOJ official said, than a...

Making an offhand comment in the presence of the Sec Def and his CoS isn't an "offer" ... so ... Debunked: Trump falsely claims he ‘requested’ 10,000 troops rejected by Pelosi :tearsofjoy:

Nope, wrong ... the domestic terrorists/insurrectionists are being housed in a different wing than the one where there were serious problems (where the non-January 6th prisoners were being housed and were ultimately relocated to other facilities) If memory serves, it's the Central Detention...

Woooo-hoo !!! :eek: :tearsofjoy: I think it's pretty funny that the problem you seem to be having with federal law enforcement is that they aren't charging the Jan 6th domestic terrorists/insurrectionists ... fast enough ... I'd say it's a fair bet, that Mr. Epps is probably a Trumper ...

So what ? :tearsofjoy:

No ... the reason was because many elected Republicans - particularly those in the House and Senate - have become terrified of their base, don't have spines, are amoral/strictly transactional, and are incapable of leadership or acting in good faith. The base has become Y'all Qaeda ... That...

Clearly, you don't "got it". :tearsofjoy: Not a question of "the Left". I asked YOU ... and YOU couldn't name a single individual. Nor apparently could anyone in the relevant law enforcement agencies, DOJ, etc. You're "sure" of all sorts of things ... including that Revolver publishes...

Yeah ... but you also think Revolver is delivering "blockbuster articles". :tearsofjoy: They are highly biased (to the right), lack transparency, use questionable sourcing, and feature low credibility. Akin to the Gateway Pundit, but a little more highbrow ... ;) Sure there is. Nope, not...

You seem to think that rationalizing is some sort of all-in, 100%-extremes-only kind of thing. It isn't. There is no "other case" ... and that's the problem. You want someone to be charged for violent actions they allegedly undertook during rioting - I get that ... yet you (or law...

As it should, given that he oversaw the team that conducted the investigation and contributed to the final report. It's a pretty large report (448 pages) ... I'd say it's a fairly safe bet that Mueller has a decent handle on the overall "big picture" contained within it, even if he couldn't...

No ... they're just a way to rationalize, often in service of a political agenda. That's true ... in isolation, absent any further context. What was the name of protester that threw the chunk of concrete at an officer that got 0 jail time ? Was the officer hit ? ... injured ? Did anyone...

So what ? :tearsofjoy: No. :tearsofjoy:

Well, we certainly know that's not true. Uh-huh ... :rolleyes: Looks like you misspelled "Trumper" there ... :tearsofjoy: How's that Arizona audit working out for you these days ? I've been keeping an eye on it ... kinds seems like it's dead in the water ... Even the Pillow Guy seems...

Because that was most certainly a restricted area at the time, and it was where the threat of violence to elected officials was most serious. Someone that actually entered the Capitol one could say might be more predisposed to commit violence against elected officials than someone who remained...

Nope - read the Mueller report. :tearsofjoy:

Then the Committee should consider granting him use immunity - then he will have no choice but to testify ... but could face charges for perjury ... if he testifies untruthfully. Sometimes you have to sacrifice a Pawn to get the King.

What does that mean ? That Judges and prosecutors aren't real keen on dimwitted miscreants resorting to rioting and domestic terrorism in an attack on the government, in an effort to subvert the peaceful transfer of power after an election ? Yeah, probably not ... and there's probably more...