Search results

Of course.

I'd assume that they are not all that concerned ... since it seems to be pretty rare: Sweden halts use of Moderna's COVID vaccine in under 30s

Or like someone who bought the pillows from the former crackhead ... :tearsofjoy:

Sounds like disaster was narrowly averted today at The Supreme Court.

crop ... not corp ... lol ...

Good to see A/G Garland being proactive and ordering the FBI and US Attorneys to get on the stick and choke off the next corp of potential domestic terrorists before it gets out of hand and they start engaging in actual violent acts.

Wrong: Capitol Police recommend disciplinary action for six officers

No - it was Double Crickets ... :tearsofjoy:

:tearsofjoy:

:clapping-happy: He really can't ... but trust me, he will give it try. :tearsofjoy:

Be that as it may, it was nonetheless, restricted. For the terminally stupid who can't seem to think straight, the barriers should have been a tipoff ... :tearsofjoy: :tearsofjoy:

Double crickets ... :tearsofjoy:

And which way do you see it going ?

If you expect me to respond to your queries in regards to various circumstances in this matter, then you're going to have to respond to mine ... rather just ignoring them. Are those claiming to never have seen any violence also in potential legal peril for their actions that day ? What is the...

Are you trying to compare a protest to the January 6th RIOT ? :tearsofjoy:

BWAHAHAHAHAHA !!! That's a good one ... First off, SAYS WHO ? (that "they" didn't see the violence) The very people who guilt or innocence in this matter is in question ? Are you familiar with the terminology "a self-serving statement (or claim)" ? :tearsofjoy: "Stiffer penalties than...

Read what I wrote again, if you are having a hard time divining my meaning. It isn't really all that hard.

No one that wasn't legally authorized/allowed to be. That would exclude Rittenhouse of course ... AND most assuredly anyone protesting or rioting (which are two entirely different things BTW) I didn't claim that no one was there - that's some concoction of your own making ... :tearsofjoy...

Nope ... particularly when you include the entirety of what Dan said: It is, in fact, a statement ... tagged with an accusation (aka direct "personal attack") at the end. Of course, you're not gonna call Dan that. The price of having a fan club does have its costs. :tearsofjoy:

In light of the particular and attendant circumstances for that specific case, how does that (recommendation) comport with Federal Sentencing Guideline for what's charged ?