Search results

Biden's "ties to the KKK" ... :tearsofjoy:

That, in the end, may be irrelevant as to who prevails in the case. He told people to go to the Capitol and to "Fight like ____" It will be up to Judge Mehta to decide whether the case moves forward, and if so on what basis ... and who all it includes. LOL ... Please tell us: Exactly how...

We'll go over this again ... since it seems you are a little slow on being able to grasp the actual facts of that particular matter (among other things): Trump wasn't blocked on Facebook and Twitter until several days after Jan 6th. And incessantly whining that the MSM is ignoring him doesn't...

No ruling yet in the Swalwell suit in the attempt to hold Trump accountable for January 6th under the Klu Klux Klan Act but Judge Mehta doesn't seem to think that the words "peacefully and patriotically" doesn't necessarily get Trump off the hook:

Tossing sloppy drunks isn't necessarily equivalent to facing down a violent, armed, and angry mob some of whom were bent on lynching and murder.

Ray Epps finally has his own Snopes article: :tearsofjoy:

An event which is part of the evidence which DOJ is charging a multi-defendant conspiracy case on: The charging docs (linked below) on one of the insurrectionists in that case also shows that he lied to FBI - multiple times - each of which is a separate crime in and of itself ... although...

Depending on the exact circumstances in each instance, sure I can. No, it isn't ... and continued assertions that it is murder is only a demonstration of ignorance. Rags provided the link that covers how that is, but it's up to folks as to whether they educate themselves out of ignorance or...

Yeah ? Well, I'm inclined to think that most that make such comments as above would probably have whizzed themselves and crapped their drawers ... long before they had a violent, angry mob that they were facing down within a few feet of them. :tearsofjoy:

That's immaterial (to the matter of whether she's a domestic terrorist, which is what you seem to be replying to) That you apparently don't recognize that it is, would seem to indicate a complete lack of understanding on the subject. :tearsofjoy: So what ? :tearsofjoy: Pretty sure no one...

And I'd say he correctly assessed the presence of an immediate threat to both himself and others. :tearsofjoy:

Without any corroborating testimony from relatives, spouses, close friends, or findings from an ME as to cause of death yes, it would. OTOH, looking at the typical suicide rate for officers in the force and if this represents a spike in that rate then it raises the question ... since there...

In a one-on-one situation ... possibly. But there was an angry, violent mob right behind her ... so that's a completely different situation. Alternatively: How about just NOT insurrectioning and rioting ? Incorrect ... possibly due to a lack of understanding of what the term actually means...

Yes ... and the report you screen-shotted references a Reuters report ... which quotes "anonymous sources" and a "former senior law enforcement official" :tearsofjoy: Ultimately, whatever charges DOJ brings will speak to the issue.

Another vote for Officer Byrd to politely ask the domestic terrorists to refrain from any further rioting - please and thank you's - while he went and found a taser or some tear gas. :tearsofjoy:

The justification for the use of deadly force under the law is a very specific thing and bears on the mindset of the officer involved. The decision that it was justified was reviewed and upheld by those charged with reviewing the matter. Those are the simple facts ... which care nothing about...

The Medical Examiner found that the events of the day contributed to Officer Sicknick's death I believe. Fairly easy to make the same argument for the officers who suicided themselves in the aftermath.

You can probably look at that up ... and then post a screenshot of it. :tearsofjoy: In the meantime you might want to actually educate yourself as to the multiple charges for conspiracy that DOJ is currently pursuing, as there are a number of them: DOJ’S APPROXIMATE JANUARY 6 CONSPIRACIES...

(Likely Grandma) "Esther" should probably count her blessings that the Feds aren't asking asking for her to do actual time:

Well, if you weren't snookered, that would be tantamount to admitting that you knew it was inaccurate before posting it ... and then knowingly posted it anyways. Either way, I'm good. :tearsofjoy: