Search results

Meanwhile, in other breaking news, Muttly's favorite pillow salesman and (allegedly former) crackhead seems to have further departed from the reality that most sane folks share: We awaiting further updates to see if there are any expansion plans in the offing ... to expand "GITMO !!!" to hold...

In Muttly's Bizarro World all law enforcement officers have perfect, absolutely spotless records when it comes to safe firearms handling. :tearsofjoy:

Another Jan 6th "genius" had appearance in Federal Court today ... it did NOT go well: :tearsofjoy:

Indeed ... particularly given the fact that it is coming from someone who probably had a whole lot LESS firearms training than the officer in question.

Not the actual ME report but this MPD IAD report references it.

No. The shot entered her chest around her left shoulder area from the left side, towards the front I believe, below the clavicle bone: And then traversed through her chest, penetrating (at least one of) her lung(s) ... tearing up some veins and arteries along the way IIRC. Would have to go...

You didn't read the FOIA'd docs from Judicial Watch did you ? You just relied on Sperry's misinformational narrative. Clearly not - Byrd and other officers issued repeated warnings to "Get Back ... Stay Back" before a shot was fired. Despite that, one FOOL WOMAN - who we now know was prone...

It's a just a pretext ... to try rationalize and normalize it ... so when it happens again some other folks (conceivably) won't be quite as horrified and repulsed by it. Folks that do that don't really see anything wrong with what happened (other than it didn't succeed) ... despite much lip...

In Ashli's case she was armed - the mob was her deadly weapon. And rightly so: The most hilarious thing about this post of yours that I'm replying to is that it appears as though you're trying compare (or even worse: equate) the shooting of an unarmed 911 caller who went outside to greet...

Byrd initially declined to speak to investigators the day shooting occurred ... until he had retained counsel. Once he retained counsel, I would assume counsel advised him not to provide an interview ... which, as it turns out, was good advice. But the real nuggets to come out of your posting...

You misspelled "that support and make threats and intimidation - including threats of physical violence and/or death threats - directed at public school officials". Keep pushing the (false) narrative that you are and I will gladly post some of the footage of these unhinged lunatics and domestic...

As he always is: :tearsofjoy: No doubt Lyin' Ted was severely intimidated from the shocking experience the other night ... when Ol' Fishsticks removed whatever little was left of his spine ... and was completely traumatized at the prospect of having to go back and grovel even further...

LOL ... I see the poor "conservative" white folk are grieving in their perpetual victimhood and "oppression" tonight. As always, it is a hoot ! :tearsofjoy:

Eagerly awaiting the first glowing endorsement of this trendy new "Drink-Your-Own-Whizz" fad from our resident EO "Alternative Therapy" crowd ... Prosit Comrades ! Here's looking to the future. :tearsofjoy:

Apparently the fervent prayers of Muttly (and likely others) have finally been answered (kinda): :tearsofjoy:

LOL ... NO. However, people like the geriatric moron cited in the court case below: ... will hopefully get the measure of justice they are due, and we can hopefully prevent any repeats of what happened to JFK.

Something which has been long overdue: :clapping-happy:

:clapping-happy: I'm sure many people need reminding ... probably almost constantly. :tearsofjoy:

Can't speak for others but I certainly don't want to memory hole it ... since it provides a great illustrative example of how people operating in bad faith can dishonestly talk out of both sides of their mouths, in an effort to provide plausible deniability for what they are really intending or...

Further details on that hearing in the civil suit against Trump for inciting the events of January 6th: Judge mulls whether Trump’s silence on Jan. 6 could amount to ‘agreement’ with rioters