Search results

Posting these here - although the general idea has been discussed elsewhere - since it is specific to a particular individual: How does Trump use coded language to speak to his base? Trump and the language of insurrection

That's at least somewhat reassuring.

More good or bad news ... perhaps depending on your partisan inclinations:

It is my opinion that you were. How long it has been used in that manner is largely irrelevant. The fact is, it was used in a manner that was something other than its plain or literal meaning. Hence: coded language ... You would be correct - but as I point out above, that's irrelevant.

It appears that Bannon and his attorney, Robert Costello - who is also Rudy's attorney - are about to get a real education as to who is a witness and possibly the crime/fraud exception to attorney-client privilege as well: Prosecutors sought call, email records of Bannon attorney, defense team...

Don't look now but .... You actually just made the case that coded language can be be properly understood by its intended recipients. :clapping-happy: :tearsofjoy:

Important points to note: First, it was a "peaceful protest" ... now it was "a riot, not an insurrection" ... Second, we've gone from "nobody had guns" to ... "a true insurrection you would have seen a take over of the government....and alot more people with guns" Of course, this latter...

Any recent updates from our white supremacist-adjacent intrepid reporter Darren Beattie on mystery man and supposed Deep State Plant Ray Epps ? :tearsofjoy:

No - you're still not getting it: I took Turtle's words literally - at face value: "the media" And he basically came back and said (more or less, so paraphrasing below): "No, what I actually said ("the media") isn't what I really meant ... I meant the Mainstream Media ..." As though someone...

Naw ... the fake news was in the post that followed the one I'm replying to now. :tearsofjoy:

You realize that the particular House Sgt-At-Arms that you are referring to (Paul Irving) was originally a Republican appointment ... that happened under John Boehner's watch ... right ? Wayback Machine As was the other official who shared primary responsibility for Capitol security, Senate...

Who said any did ? :tearsofjoy:

Oh ... I see now: You were using coded language and I was supposed to "mind read" and determine that you actually meant something other than what you actually wrote. Thanks for clearing that up ! About that "study" ... (which actually isn't "from John Hopkins"): Here’s What We Know About...

Probably a safe bet Mitt won't be getting the invite for Thanksgiving dinner from Ronna this year. :tearsofjoy:

So what ? SB 1303 isn't a mandate - it's a law.

Doesn't really matter - as it would be a valid law if either one of them did. But to answer your question, the previous governor did sign it into law: Bipartisan law, SB 1303, sparks debate as new VA governor is set to lift school mask order

I expect Ronna is on the phone right now with Mar-a-Lago, taking dictation on what the censure or motion to expel from the party should say. :tearsofjoy:

Yer modern GOP: :tearsofjoy:

Where's the link ? :tearsofjoy:

Wrong ... again. :tearsofjoy: