Search results

No - what I'm going with is that you are apparently basing your assertion as to what happened off of an edited video released by a couple of highly questionable (partisan) outfits and their (breathless) "reporting" on it. If the guy really had something, he'd release the full unedited video and...

That was what the average was in that instance, yes. While two days may seem like little to some, a shorter period of infectiousness could result in substantially less viral spread ... particularly if folks are feeling pressure to return to work for whatever reason (economic, a sense of duty to...

And this is all based off of supposedly "new" video footage (which is doctored/edited) ... from an (Alex Jones) InfoWars videographer ... just "published" day before yesterday by the Epoch Times (and Gateway Pundit) ... more than a year after it supposedly happened ? Sure ... you betcha ...

:rolleyes: Vaccine reduces transmission in breakthrough cases No, vaccinated people are not ‘just as infectious’ as unvaccinated people if they get COVID

May she wasn't happy with how quickly he was getting that glass broken out ? Ever think of that ? Remember: she was calling for those doors to be opened and for the mob to be let in. ;)

Yes ... just not to the question you (and Ron) claimed she did. That's not the entire story: the also appear to be highly effective at preventing serious COVID illness and, to some extent, the spread (vs. unvaccinated) Currently, that is the situation, yes. It doesn't prevent you from a...

She does have a point ... :tearsofjoy:

Oath Keeper's head Rhodes detained until trial due to being a danger to the public: Guess the judge wasn't too impressed with the escape tunnels and razor wire placed around his previous house. :tearsofjoy:

Ok. So far as you know. How do you know that ?

Yes - it isn't. It's about comparative risks vs beneficial outcomes. No indication in that last tweet (with video) you posted that anyone asked a question, unless perhaps you are referring to the FL Senator who was questioning the Surgeon General Nominee. Is that who you are referring to ...

Well, that might account for the lack of familiarity. :tearsofjoy:

It's relevant because it serves to push back against the false narrative that some - possibly yourself included - have put forward about how these were all just poor, poor peaceful tourists/protestors/fill-in-the-blank-with-your-own-term that were being "persecuted". They were not. After the...

The story there is not quite as simplistic as you seem to suggest ... there was a little more to it. 1960 United States presidential election in Hawaii It's not ... but it's ok if you want to believe that ... ;)

I have no need to ... I already know. :tearsofjoy: My pleasure.

So what ? :tearsofjoy: As well as take hydrogen peroxide orally. And drink your own urine ... if that sorta thing floats your boat. :tearsofjoy: I didn't say one couldn't do it ... I'm just not sure that it would necessarily be good medicine.

I'll go with the makers of the products who say they are not. You can go with DeSantis. :tearsofjoy: Which they promptly revised. Looks like they already have. That's they way science works.

Lessee ... who is more credible ? Lying politician who appears to be fudging his own state's reporting COVID numbers and is trying to deflect from his own screw ups in order to save face ? Or ... the FDA, the CDC, and the concurring makers of the products that are in dispute ? For some folks...

:tearsofjoy: Yeah, sure ... on the other hand, monoclonals are totes cool ... and totally safe: FACT SHEET FOR HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION (EUA) OF BAMLANIVIMAB AND ETESEVIMAB

Well, one way would be if someone took one of the ineffective therapeutics under the mistaken assumption and believing it would actually handle their condition. Based on whose recommendation and guidance ? ... The Muttly School of Roll Yer Own Backyard Pharmacology's "Mix-N-Match" Protocol ...