Truck Topics
An Expediter and his AirTabs
Wind resistance and
aerodynamic drag is the MPG killer. All other things being equal, like
weight of the vehicle, driving speeds, even driving habits, it is wind
resistance that affects everything. Driving slower, no jack rabbit
starts, using the brakes less, and discarding unnecessary items to
reduce weight are all things you can do to help increase your fuel
mileage. But whether you do any or all of these things, the one
constant is wind resistance. You can’t eliminate wind resistance and
drag, but you can reduce it, in some cases dramatically, to mitigate
its effects on everything you do.
When you drive down the road you
must push the air in front of you out of the way. The mathematics of
what happens as you do this can get very complicated, but what it all
means is, when you push the air in front of you out of the way, it
causes the air pressure in front of you, as well as around you to
increase, and the area directly behind you will have reduced air
pressure. This area of reduced air pressure is called “aerodynamic
drag†because the reduced air pressure wants to “drag†you back into
it.
To
reduce air resistance and drag, the first thing you need to do is
eliminate anything you can which causes resistance in the first place.
Side mirrors and the brackets cause quite a bit of resistance, but you
don’t want to remove those. An exterior sun visor is a major factor in
wind resistance, and many people have removed it for that reason. I
installed a bug shield and side window rain guards on my Sprinter and
noticed an immediate hit on fuel mileage, which didn’t come as a
surprise. The surprise was just how big a hit it was – more than half a
mile per gallon. The Sprinter’s front end is pretty streamlined, so it
didn’t take much to mess it up.
Knowing
that the bug shield and rain guards increased resistance, I ordered
Airtabs to help reduce the drag. Airtabs themselves will cause wind
resistance, of course, as they will interrupt the airflow along the
vehicle. But the vortex they create reduces the size and intensity of
the low pressure aerodynamic drag far more than any resistance they may
cause.
I
had the rare opportunity to get my Sprinter into the wind tunnel at a
local college to observe what happens before and after the Airtabs, as
well as with and without the bug shield and rain guards. What we
observed was rather dramatic.
Turns
out, the bug shield and rain guard added a combined 7% increase in wind
resistance, which translates to about a 3 ½% to 4% hit on fuel economy.
At 22 MPG that’s about .8 MPG, which is a lot.
After
a day of the students gathering the “before†data, Airtabs were mounted
as close to the trailing edge of the Sprinter as you can get and still
have them on a flat surface. With the Airtabs installed, the drag was
dramatically reduced and showed a wind resistance reduction of more
than 10%, which translates into a fuel economy savings of about 5% or
6%, which coincides with my own actual calculations. Without the bug
shield I could expect at least a 3% to 4% gain in fuel economy, so the
wind tunnel math and the 2% to 4% claims made by Airtab are the same.
With the Airtabs and no bug shield, I'd be getting 22-23 MPG instead of
the 21-22 that I currently get. (I need to dump a couple hundred pounds
of junk that have accumulated inside the van, too).
The
whole wind tunnel thing was very interesting, but mainly just confirmed
stuff I already had a pretty good idea about. It was fun watching it
all. One thing it showed that I haven't done anything about is, it
wouldn't hurt to place a row of Airtabs underneath the rear step bumper
of the Sprinter, as that bumper causes quite a bit of drag on its own.
Most of it is pulled out by the installed Airtabs, but it certainly
appeared that there could be some benefit from adding them there,
albeit just a small benefit. I'm just not sure they would hold up under
the stresses of the road grime, as there is no optimal flat surface
under the bumper to affix the Airtabs. The other installed Airtabs have
held up just fine after nearly two years, however.
I
was surprised at how little of an impact that the Qualcomm satellite
bubble and mount had on wind resistance. There was some, but the
Airtabs on the roof took care of it. I was also surprised at how little
of an impact that the Sprinter side mirrors had on resistance.
Apparently, the bracket that holds them out there also acts as sort of
a vortex generator on its own and mitigates drag behind the mirrors.
That’s not the case with most side mirrors, however, and Airtabs would
almost certainly be a benefit to them. An open roof vent showed a large
amount of resistance and drag, as well.
In
test after test at the tunnel, a dirty vehicle, especially one with a
bug covered windshield, would show up to a 3% hit in wind resistance at
speeds above 55 MPH, which translates into a 1-2% hit in fuel economy.
That's way more than I would have guessed. They also partially
confirmed the myth of windows down versus air conditioning, in that at
speeds of 55 MPH or greater, the wind resistance is so high that
running the air conditioner is more fuel efficient (10% hit) than with
the windows down (12-15% hit depending on speed). But at speeds below
55 MPH, running with your windows down saves fuel.
Tests
showed that a larger, taller bug shield as you might find on a big
truck would benefit from having Airtabs on the front of the shield.
Tests also confirmed what I already knew, that above 60 MPH the
effectiveness of my bug shield was reduced to near zero as the high
wind and air pressure would just slam the bugs into the windshield,
anyway.
The
thing about wind resistance and aerodynamic drag is, once you have
taken the simple steps to reduce them, it’s a set-it-and-forget-it kind
of thing. At that point, the only thing that affects resistance and
drag is speed. Aerodynamic drag can be calculated, although with the
many nooks and crannies on a vehicle it is hard to calculate. But it is
as simple as:
Aerodynamic drag = 1/2 D x A x
V2
D
is the Density of the air,
A
is the frontal area of the moving shape, and
V
is the Velocity of the shape.
But
that’s just the math. You have to translate that into the real world of
real body shapes, like a truck, and to do that you need to know the
Drag Coefficient of the vehicle, which nobody knows unless you have
easy access to a wind tunnel. The Drag Coefficient is important
because, in combination with the frontal area of the vehicle, it
determines the power cost of pushing object (truck, van, car) through
the air at a given speed. Certain geometric shapes, like a sphere,
cube, rectangle, etc., all have mathematically established coefficients
(sphere=.47, cube=1.05, rectangle=.82, airplane wing=.04). But these
are regular shapes, not real bodies with irregularities like mirrors
and grilles and bumpers and headlights. But even if you don’t know the
Drag Coefficient of your vehicle, all you need to know is that Airtabs
will greatly reduce it.
For
real body shapes, roughly standard air conditions of average
atmospheric pressure and altitude, V in MPH, and drag measured in
pounds of force, the above translated equation becomes:
Drag = 1/391 x Cd x A x
V2
This illustrates that to calculate the drag you need to know:
Cd
- the Drag Coefficient;
A
- the frontal Area of whatever you’re driving through the air; and
V2
- the speed of the air past it. The
1/391
fraction accounts for the air density conditions.
To
the average person, me included, that formula means exactly squat,
‘cause no one is gonna take the time to do the measurements required to
figure it all out. But, it does tell us one very important thing:
aerodynamic forces are proportional to the square of the speed
.
In other words, when you double the speed you quadruple the drag. It
also tells us that since driving 60 MPH into a 15 MPH headwind, the
same as driving 75 MPH on a windless day, the airspeed is increased by
25%, and thus doubles the drag.
Anything
you can do to reduce wind resistance and aerodynamic drag will benefit
your bottom line fuel economy. Airtabs are a no-brainer. I like
no-brainers.