Where do you find this stuff LOL
Did you draw this?
If you live in the country, the zoning laws are less or none.
That is why I don't live in an addition
If I want to fire my gun off the front porch, I can(although the neighbors might not like it, but it's not illegal)
If I want to have 25 rusted cars on my front lawn I can
I just pick a phrase in the post and Google it.
Then go to images.
You'll change your mind when the house next to yours is purchased and a used car lot or adult bookstore is put in, right between your house and the next one over. Some zoning laws, minimal and reasonable, are necessary.
Screw that............
I have a right, by way of city ordinances, to protect the value of my property, period.
Having a "blight" that effects the appearence of our community will be dealt with. This is not a 3rd world community where the streets are dirt, goats are tied up to the front tree, and where chickens run free. We have asphalted streets, concrete driveways, green and well kept yards, along with toilets that flush. If the Martinez-Rodriguez-Hernandez's that just moved in miss the way of life from home, then by Gawd they can just swim back across the river for all I care. Only thing I'm concerned about is not seeing 2 Ford F150's with low fat skateboard wheels parked 4 feet from their front door on a yard that was well kept by the previous "renter" when there's a nice clean concrete driveway 30 feet away that was meant for cars to be parked on.
Now, if I just described your neighborhood in the first part of my paragraph, then I apologize for having higher standards in life when it comes to my residence, my neighborhood, and the community I choose to live in. When you stop being a "renter", and finally a "Homeowner", you may just understand what I just said. Til then......You know what you can do with that "Free Liberty & Live and Let Live" opinion.
Whoever said I was a renter?
So... you like your property value to stay high for what reason? Higher taxes?
Just bustin yer balls here. I know what you're saying, tho I don't necessarily agree with it. You can't cure idiocy, and you can't legislate against it, necessarily. And if they're renting and doing that, go talk to the landlord. Don't give anymore power to the gubmint. Too many ppl want relief from them, and that just means more restrictions. We need to talk to one another, rather than letting gubmint be an arbitrator/rule maker.
Imagine how my neighbors here in White Bread and Mayonnaise land must have felt 12 years ago when we moved in... not only were we born and raised in the 'hood, but we also promptly slapped a gargoyle on the roof peak.
I had every right to turn them in. I have every right to protect my property value.
"Bruises fade and bones will mend-but a psyche can be ruined FOREVER" : LisaLouHoo, c. 2008
With all due respect, one's desire to "protect" his/her property value shouldn't trump the rights of others to do as they want with their property as long as safety issues don't come into play. As a homeowner, myself, I couldn't careless what my neighbor(s) do, as long as it doesn't impact my safety.
This non-sensical obsession over property values is often nothing more than veiled descrimination against certain classes and races.
I would submit that if you went to a ghetto, and bought a house, and fixed it up to perfection, their own "housing authority" would take it upon themselves to robbing or trashing it out of jealousy; and that would be open discrimination against certain classes and races. Wouldn't it?
When in Rome... IOW, don't move into an affluent neighborhood if you can't afford, or are too lazy to keep up your responsibilities to the neighborhood.
You're right... sometimes it's taken too far. Some people are too anal about their home value. If you think, like I do, that people should have more latitude in what they do with their property, then do what I'm working towards, and buy 20 acres or so. I guarantee you won't have any neighbor problems.
The problem is, zoning regs often do go too far and more often than not, they tend to be nothing more than social engineering agendas.
Don't confuse "Zoning Regulations" with "City Ordinances".
Zoning Regulations are in place to help keep certain businesses and industrial entities, as well as family housing separated. You really wouldn't want a city where when you went down Main St it would be McDonalds, Mr and Mrs Smith, Mutual Steel Fabicators, The Jones Family, Bobs Used Cars, Thomas Tinker, and Chueys Laundromat all on the same block next door to each other. (Although, parts of Phoenix Arizona are just like this!!)
City Ordinances are in place so that Mr Smith and Mr Jones aren't at war with each other all the time cause Mr Jones is a Lazy Turd that only mows his yard once every six weeks, or because Mr Smith decided to build a fence around his property using Tin Cans, recycled steel panels, and 12 doors off an old barn he found.
There is nothing wrong with Zoning Laws or City Ordinances at all. They were created to keep peace within a City, and to help keep Cities somewhat aesthetically pleasing to attract more citizens and business owners that wish to live there or do business there.
Also, when it comes to "Homeowners Associations", I do honor their existence, but at times disagree with some restrictions that are brought forth upon the homeowners within that community.
Case in point in Frisco Texas a couple of years ago. Nice community built by a well known builder. Average home price in that neighborhood in the $400K range. Large Lots and either side or rear entry 3-4 car garages. Well to do guy bought house for his family to live there. Had 2 teenagers that had their own cars. (both expensive sports cars) Wife drove a really nice Escalade. His choice of vehicle was $40K Ford F150 quad cab that was one of those "Regency" Conversion type of trucks. Running boards, 2 tone paint, expensive rims and tires, etc. Well, he was a good father and allowed the kids to park in 2 of the houses garage spaces. His wife parked in the 3rd space, while the 4th space was used to hold all his lawn equipment, bikes, sports stuff, etc. Had to keep this stuff in the garage cause the Homeowners Association didn't allow outdoor "storage" buildings on property.
Now, he has a 4 car "side entry" garage on this house, and all 4 spaces were being used. Where was he to park his "PERSONAL" Truck??? He would just back down the side driveway, pass all the garage spaces, up against the black wrought iron fence surrounding the backyard, but still on his cobblestone driveway. His 'PERSONAL" truck could be seen from the street as you were passing by going down the street, but just for a brief second if you were staring hard enough.
Well, someone didn't like that "Truck" sitting in the driveway, called the Homeowners Association, and told 'em the guy was parking his WORK trucks in the neighborhood. Homeowners Association came and investigated, and declared his PERSONAL truck a WORK truck and issued him a warning. He told 'em to blow it out their wa-wa's, so they filed a Lawsuit against him. Court Battle ensued and he actually won. Made the News here and everything.
So, on this part, NO, I do not agree with what the Homeowners Association tried to pull with this idiot behavior. BUT, if the guy had painted his house bright pink and was a blight in that neighborhood, I would support any Lawsuit the Homeowners Association brought forth against him.
Interesting thread so far........................
I
While there are some distict differences in theory, in practice, both forms of regulations are often used interchangeably for the same purpose, social engineering(read: certain classes/races, etc. Not allowed).