The celebrations were offset by the riots and government staged demonstrations by "Uncle Al" and his "buddies" in the DOJ
76-year-old man to stand trial in shooting death of 13-year-old boy
The media wasted no time trying to create more racial tension. And had the gull to drag Zimmerman's name into it
but also as High Up as the Ignorant President of the United States we have in Office Today
Until we get this country out from under the "Hope and Change" Mistake it made back in 2008.
76-year-old man to stand trial in shooting death of 13-year-old boy
The media wasted no time trying to create more racial tension. And had the gull to drag Zimmerman's name into it
It's all about dividing the nation. There is hardly a mention when a black kid kills a black kid. A house divided will fall.
Nobody cares if Blacks slaughter each other. There is no racial component (Honkey) involved, so no Hate Crime, therefore no national media exposure. No national media coverage means no Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, etc. to stir up some real home cooked hatred.... African Americans accounted for 49% of all homicide victims in the US — again, almost exclusively at the hands of other African Americans.”
What about justice for these people? Protest, Blackouts, Riots? To me it seems like a huge double standard and I really don’t understand it.
The jury really had no choice, because the prosecution didn't [or couldn't] prove that the sole witness [that would be the defendant] was a liar.
I wonder if their verdict would have been different if they knew that Zimmerman's wife is going on trial next, after he allowed [if not encouraged] her to commit perjury in a court of law.
The thing is, she WILL be found guilty, and then she can kiss her chances of getting hired as a nurse goodbye, because no hospital or health care facility will hire a convicted perjurer.
The defense said "There are no monsters here", and that's true - just a lot of sad losers.
I'm not arguing the verdict, because it's what I expected [the prosecution did not prove Zimmerman guilty] and it's legally correct, but: how can anyone determine Zimmerman's state of mind at the moment he pulled the weapon? The only way to decide is to evaluate his credibility, because his story is all there was.
And Zimmerman was a liar, plain and simple. He lied numerous times about numerous things, and personally, I believe he lied about the last few minutes of Martin's life. We'll probably never know what really happened, in truth. But it's also true that better the guilty go free than the innocent go to prison, I guess.
What concerns me now is that Zimmerman is the perfect example of what gun control advocates fear most: a citizen with the motive, means, and authority to carry a concealed weapon, but not the mature judgement required.
If mature judgement were required to exercise one's rights then Pelosi, Reid, Obama, Holder, Feinstein, Jackson, Sharpton, Jackson-Lee and others would never be allowed to open their mouths and speak.
If mature judgement were required to exercise one's rights then Pelosi, Reid, Obama, Holder, Feinstein, Jackson, Sharpton, Jackson-Lee and others would never be allowed to open their mouths and speak.
I could list the Republican equivalents, but that's completely off topic.
A right to cause the death of another person ought to be accompanied by good judgement - especially in these times, when so many want to eliminate that right.
That would depend on what ones version of "good judgement" should be. In todays world, that is very subjective.
I could list the Republican equivalents, but that's completely off topic.
A right to cause the death of another person ought to be accompanied by good judgement - especially in these times, when so many want to eliminate that right.
That would depend on what ones version of "good judgement" should be. In todays world, that is very subjective.
It is NOT the right to cause a death of another person. It IS the RIGHT to defend one's self against death or severe bodily harm, by what ever means that are needed to accomplish that, up to and including use of lethal force. That is a HUMAN RIGHT! One of the most important. Everyone should be terrified of ANYONE or ANY government that would limit or eliminate your RIGHT TO LIVE! This government seeks to do EXACTLY that.
The Second Amendment goes MUCH further than that.
No one questions the right to defend oneself. But that right does not include the right to be a primary aggressor, then claim self defense, which is what a lot of people [including me] believe Zimmerman did.
He won the battle, but he may have helped to lose the war over the right to carry concealed, because what he did was just plain stupid.