California is not in a world of its own, when talking about expediting loads going in or out.
That is true, IF you ignore the distance California is located from reliable freight lanes (to the extent that reliable freight lanes exist).
I think most expediters will agree that more expedited freight is found east of the Mississippi River and north of I-20. Texas is closer to that area than California. Assuming both states have slow freight at the moment and a bunch of trucks stacked up, would not a load going to Texas be the better choice than one going to California, especially if the loads pay little more than breakeven to get you there?
Diane and I have watched expediters snap up California-bound loads at prices that leave us wondering why they even bother. Are people getting so desperate for the cash needed to make their next truck or house payment that the "big" paycheck is worth running at breakeven or worse? Does the emotional need to stop sitting and haul something at any price overcome the common sense of refusing loads that don't pay?
Yes, there is room for any number of opinions in expediting (which is good news for me, since I have changed my mind about California and may change my mind again). But the numbers are less forgiving.
It does not matter what you believe or do not believe. If your money is flowing out faster than it is flowing in, you are doomed, even if you are in it for the camping trip. Expediting is a business. It's not about being right or wrong. It's about being profitable or not.
Choose California expedited freight opportunities with great care if you want to survive in this business in these times.
Last edited: