It seems to me that pretending to have virtuous character, and the contrivance of a false appearance of virtue or goodness is precisely what they're guilty of. They contrived to appear virtuous and good by having a Christian prayer before every meeting, [where Christian is synonymous with virtuous], but showed their real character when prayer of a different kind [but no less virtuous] was offered. The tolerance they'd always enjoyed was entirely one sided, and the command to 'love thy neighbor' only applies to some neighbors.
I could see the rebuff if the prayer were offered by a Pastafarian, or a Satan worshipper, or even a Pagan [if they have prayers, I don't actually know about that], but Buddhism is a major and well accepted religion, as is Islam.
That's the whole problem with freedom of religion: it treats 'religion' as just one thing, when it's many. And the believers of each very often cannot get along with the others. That goes for Christianity, as well, which has many different splinters, offshoots, and sects, and they don't play well with others at all. Trying to please all of them is a nightmare.
I could see the rebuff if the prayer were offered by a Pastafarian, or a Satan worshipper, or even a Pagan [if they have prayers, I don't actually know about that], but Buddhism is a major and well accepted religion, as is Islam.
That's the whole problem with freedom of religion: it treats 'religion' as just one thing, when it's many. And the believers of each very often cannot get along with the others. That goes for Christianity, as well, which has many different splinters, offshoots, and sects, and they don't play well with others at all. Trying to please all of them is a nightmare.