What's Going on in the US House of Representatives?

ATeam

Senior Member
Retired Expediter
Maybe this ChatGPT that some rely on for their information isn’t the most healthiest thing, imo.
I never said it was. I have rejected ChatGPT answers many times because they were inadequate or inaccurate. But I used the answer cited above because it comports with other sources that give essentially the same answer when asked. Do you know a better way to describe the far-right portion of the political spectrum than ChatGPT's way?

ChatGPT is my go-to source for any question I have because it responds instantly and usually accurately. But it's new and wise ChatGPT users know to be alert for incorrect responses.

Example, just yesterday, a gym-owner colleague asked me for a set of gym-etiquette rules. Rather than providing a document, I directed him to ChatGPT where he could ask his question, receive an instant response, and then tell ChatGPT to modify the rules to add, omit, emphasize or de-emphasize what he wanted. In less time than he would take to open, read and modify my document, he could have ChatGPT produce a customized document specifically for his gym.

ChatGPT is an amazing time-saver. As it learns, it's responses are getting more accurate by the day. You said it isn't the most healthy thing to rely on for information. Maybe so. But for the productivity gains it provides, it is a welcome resource in our business and my life.

Another example. Today, we are considering applicants for a job we have open. One of them says she is an "influencer." Not knowing much about this emerging career field, I went online to learn more.

Old way: Google "influencer" and sort through the dozens of links Google provides.
New way: Ask ChatGPT and instantly receive a summary article. Then, ask GPT to instantly answer the questions the first article prompts.

The new way is like having a human conversation with a subject-matter expert.

If a topic is one of major importance, it of course makes sense to rely on more sources than ChatGPT. But having discovered how fast and beneficial ChatGPT can be, ChatGPT is where I start. I keep a ChatGPT tap open on my browser and my phone, and I use it several times a day. If you play around with it a bit yourself, I think you'll also find ChatGPT and other AI apps it to be quite useful.
 
Last edited:

ATeam

Senior Member
Retired Expediter
Another Santos Lie

Santos attorney on June 6, 2023: ""Mr. Santos would rather surrender to pretrial detainment than subject these suretors to what will inevitably come. He has no intention of revealing their names, and he will not do so, even if it means he must remain in jail."

On June 22, 2023, Santos did not surrender to pretrial detainment. He instead allowed the judge to release the suretor names. The two suretors were his father and aunt.
 

Pilgrim

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
No one should disagree that George Santos is a liar and a sleazy worm in general. Yet the people in his district voted for him anyway, since he had made himself a known quantity when he previously ran for that office. He lied and misrepresented his resume for financial gain and to get elected, then got busted for wire fraud and money laundering among other offenses. Does this sound similar to crimes committed by a well-known president's son? But I digress; most all are in agreement that Santos is getting what he deserves.

On the other hand, Adam Schiff lied repeatedly before Congress, on national TV, and in various other media to perpetrate lies that amounted to slander and defamation of character against a sitting POTUS for the purpose of perpetrating a hoax impeachment based on accusations that were known by himelf and other Democrats to be false. These Democrats and the media are now outraged that Schiff was censured by the Republicans in the House for his lies and misrepresentations. Who are they to impugn the character of this towering figure in Congress who should be so sullied by this slap on the wrist for being a sleazy liar? Will Schiff get what he deserves? He's running for the CA Senate seat being vacated by Diane Feinstein in 2024. What will the voters in CA think?
 

muttly

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
It took five years of “investigating” for slap on the wrist charges against Hunter Biden and three months for charges against Santos. Dems got it good.
 

muttly

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
“Investigators” slow walked the Hunter Biden “Investigation” and let FARA violations statute of limitations run out. Sneaky sneaky.
Dems loved bringing that charge against Trump associates.
 

Pilgrim

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
The Left is still in the dark about Schiff lying. They wouldn’t know because the Left media doesn’t report that he lies.
Many of the liberal pundits still claim he was telling the truth. They'll stick with the Russian hoax lies so they can keep their Pulitzer prizes and maintain the narrative.
 

Pilgrim

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
SCOTUS strikes a blow for common sense, strikes down Biden's student loan bailout. This ridiculous vote buying scheme was doomed from the start because Biden never had the authority to grant it.

Now the student loan program needs to be completely redesigned. Good luck with that since the US Govt now controls the administration of student loans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: danthewolf00

muttly

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
They struck down Biden’s authoritarian move. Dems should be happy.
“Unlawful presidential power”
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: danthewolf00

ATeam

Senior Member
Retired Expediter
Marjorie Taylor Greene Displays Explicit Porn Posters at Congressional Hearing

I once heard it said by a US Congressman that Marjorie Taylor Green is not well. This stunt of hers adds credibility to that assertion.

 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: danthewolf00

muttly

Veteran Expediter
Retired Expediter
How come the Dems are blowing off all the revealing testimony from the whistleblowers? Truth must hurt too much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: danthewolf00
Top