There won't be any meaningful talks. Just a bunch of BS deals behind closed doors and good citizens will be screwed while illegals and the rest of the world are treated royally.
Put another way, politicians in general and Democrats in particular insist they must have more of OUR money to spend on THEIR pet projects like the Green New Deal.Dems can’t even agree to modest cuts in spending growth. Too funny. Actually sad.
Once again they blame Republicans for their out of control spending....when Republicans have to fix their foul ups.We have unserious politicians:
View attachment 22435
I have no doubts if he was a Democrat, a move to expell him would already be underway.Santos Charged - Faces 20 Years in Prison
"Rep. George Santos, R-N.Y., was charged by federal prosecutors for an array of crimes, including fraud, theft, money laundering and making false statements."
“'Taken together, the allegations in this indictment charge Santos with relying on repeated dishonesty and deception to ascend to the halls of Congress and enrich himself,' [US Attorney] Peace said." (Source)
Now that Santos is charged, what should the House Speaker do with this member? If the member was a Democrat but all other circumstances regarding his conduct were the same, should the Speaker treat him differently?
What has been done in the past when a member is charged with serious federal crimes?
Innocent until proven guilty right?Santos Charged
"Rep. George Santos, R-N.Y., was charged by federal prosecutors for an array of crimes, including fraud, theft, money laundering and making false statements."
“'Taken together, the allegations in this indictment charge Santos with relying on repeated dishonesty and deception to ascend to the halls of Congress and enrich himself,' [US Attorney] Peace said." (Source)
Now that Santos is charged, what should the House Speaker do with this member? If the member was a Democrat but all other circumstances regarding his conduct were the same, should the Speaker treat him differently?
What has been done in the past when a member is charged with serious federal crimes?
It appears McCarthy and other Republicans are defending his right to due process. Santos was no stranger to the party that nominated him or the people who voted for him in his NY district. It seems reasonable to allow him his day in court.The longer McCarthy and other Republicans defend Santos, the longer Democrats will enjoy and use the talking point this is.
I do not disagree, but It's also repugnant to let a snake like that slither about while he awaits his day in court in a justice system that is painfully slow.It seems reasonable to allow him his day in court.
They have come to know him better in recent days, haven't they? His donors must be especially proud of him.Santos was no stranger to the party that nominated him or the people who voted for him in his NY district.
Not exactly a scientific survey of party criminality. On the flip side, at the presidential level, the Republicans have the decisive lead.Interesting that 8 of 12 of the examples are D and 4 of 12 R. Probably about the usual ratio of criminality between the two parties.
Due in part to D known criminals with presidential connections being given passes through the years.Not exactly a scientific survey of party criminality. On the flip side, at the presidential level, the Republicans have the decisive lead.
Sadly, politics is a domain that attracts or develops certain criminals. Some enter the game with criminal intent. Others give into the temptations of power and become corrupt.