Phil,
Have you considered the possibility that FDCC might have lost a customer or two on the west coast? Or that current customers that utilize your type of truck may be going through a down period or slow down?
Express center activity changes all the time. Automakers close up to re tool. Current customers lose contracts. Other carriers undercut FDCC and gain our business. FDCC gets new customers all the time. LA is a big import center for shipments from Japan. Those shipments are almost non existent now.
Perhaps the reason for putting on flat rate reefer trucks is they are expecting increased business activity based on a new contract(s) which we know nothing about.
Thank you for your reply. I asked for alternative points of view and that is exactly what you provided. I appreciate it. Thank you.
Yes, we have considered the possibility that FDCC might have lost a customer or two on the west coast, or that current customers that utilize our type of truck may be going through a down period or slow down. We have also considered the Japan slowdown and competitive forces.
The information we are working with comes from flat-rate truck drivers, flat-rate truck fleet owners and people in the office at Green. No one has talked about the loss of a major customer. The freight is still flowing from existing customers. The difference is it is going on flat rate trucks while trucks like ours are passed over.
Regarding an anticipated increase in business because of the flat rate trucks, company people all say that is the hope and intent that lies behind the decision to buy and operate company equipment which is intended to haul truckload freight. The problem is that no one has pointed to even one new account where the plan is working.
Company people have told me about new accounts in the past. They do not name customers, of course, but when I have asked in the past, they have told me when a new account or series of loads that resulted from a new initiative. Because it was not my reason for calling, I did not ask specifically about new customers produced by new flat rate trucks. But in the conversations I had, there was ample opportunity for people to provide at least tangential evidence that these company trailers are hauling something other than the freight percentage-of-load contractors used to haul and also haul. They did not.
For discusion purposes, let's say that it is as you say. For whatever reason -- Japan slowdown, loss of customers, express center variables, whatever -- West Coast freight has slowed. Sending company-owned trailers and flat-rate contractors into that shrinking pie, and giving them preferential dispatch in and out, will not help percentage-of-load contractors, it will hurt them.
You have done well with FDCC. Perhaps the company has plans that will be of benefit to all of there contractors.
We have indeed done well with FDCC, very well in fact. But when things change and the changes are reflected in our declining volume of West Coast freight, Diane and I are not ones to cling to the hope that our declining revenue and the shrinking number of states in which we can make money are somehow part of a larger plan to benefit all contractors; especially when the company is saying absolutely nothing about such a plan.
We don't have columns on our spreadsheet entitled "hope" or "perhaps" or "maybe the company is doing this."
It's about the money as it has always been.
If we want to journey into the land of maybe this and perhaps that, two or more directions can be taken. It is just as easy to use the emergence of flat rate trucks to spin a story about a master plan to fold FDCC into FedEx Freight while eliminating all percentage-of-load contractors.
I'm not going there as such stories, good and bad, greatly exceed the scope of our one-truck business, and they are all hypothetical. All we need in the real world is a carrier that will keep us running and pay us more, or at least as much, as any other carrier in the industry that has use for a truck like ours and a team like us.