We're All Branch Davidians Now

AMonger

Veteran Expediter
We’re All Branch Davidians Now

by Anthony Gregory

Recently by Anthony Gregory: Noninterventionism: Cornerstone of a Free Society

Nineteen years ago,just outside Waco, Texas,the FBI demonstrated once again that the state at its core is a killing machine. Monarchy,democracy,or republic –any government as conventionally defined is a legal monopoly on violence. The state is always inclined toward oppression, division,conquest,and bloodshed, because these are its tools of trade.

Matters are no different here. The myth of a free America was always seen with bitter irony by those not blessed by such freedom. In the founding generation,as half a million labored in slavery,many who fought in the Revolution genuinely believed in liberty,but for the ruling elite who chided them on,liberty was hardly more than a slogan. This has always been true of our political leaders. The Father of the Country was a centralizing slaveowner. Old Hickory talked up freedom as he threatened war on South Carolina and forced the Cherokee to flee from their ancestral land on a barbarously murderous walk of shame. The Great Emancipator turned America into a military dictatorship and abolished the revolutionary right of secession. Wilson’s New Freedom was cover for a Prussianized war machine generating revenue for his profiteering buddies on Wall Street. Roosevelt’s Four Freedoms failed to include the freedom not to be drafted or interned in a concentration camp. Ronald Reagan threw the word freedom around as he trained Latin American torturers and raped the Bill of Rights in the name of fighting drugs. The United States has never lived up to its rhetoric.

But the events from February 28 through April 19,1993,still stand out in my mind as a watershed. It was the post-Cold War regime’s coming of age, signifying a major event in cultural history.

Everything about Operation Showtime was brazen,and it seemed like an overreach even by some of the government’s establishment defenders. Yet today Washington’s fixers must look back at these embarrassments as a hiccup at most,as growing pains on the way to establishing a militarized law-and-order apparatus of nearly unlimited power. That this stepping stone was reached on the eve of the Internet era,right before the old media began its decline in influence,was most convenient for the police state and its solidification.

The propaganda against the Branch Davidians was perfectly tuned to appeal to the masses,each adjustment in frequency coming just in time to keep the people listening. Religious fanatics with a meth lab, armed and dangerous,abusing their children –few wanted to stand up for these people during the siege. Even fewer wished to identify the Davidian response to the original raid for what it was: self-defense. The Davidians fired on the ATF so long as the ATF fired upon the Davidians,and when the ATF ran out of ammo,the Davidians held their fire. The government’s officials were the aggressors. What followed were fifty-one days of psychological warfare designed to isolate the Davidians –from water, from food,from the press,their lawyers and family –and break them down like any wartime enemy.

So preposterous was the standoff that eventually even the mainstream media began asking questions. A New York Times exposé on March 28 raised all sorts of troubling issues,which only multiplied in the days that followed. Federal agents said that supervisors had known they had lost the element of surprise,but decided to go ahead with the February 28 raid anyway. Agents were reportedly unhappy with their equipment and communication methods. The poor planning and lack of contingency options were exposed. No medical assistance had been prepared for the ATF's raid. Reports emerged that some of the ATF agents had injured or killed one another in friendly fire. There were hints that other agents might have even been captured and let go by the Davidians. The ATF intelligence chief stopped holding press conferences as the heat continued to mount.

On April 19,tired from the boredom and bad publicity of just standing around outside the "compound," the FBI drove a tank through the Davidians’home,pumped it full of CS gas,launched incendiary devices at the building,and watched it go up in flames. As soon as the stakes became higher,as soon as questioning the feds meant implying they had committed mass murder,the media stopped barking defiantly and jumped back to the government’s lap.

The Democrats,home of America’s center-left,oversaw this exceedingly important event in the development of the police state. Unsurprisingly,every respectable liberal defended the government and believed Clinton’s people when they demonized the Davidians. The entire respectable right went along with the bloodletting,too. Why wouldn’t they?It was a raid planned by George H.W. Bush’s ATF,carried out by the Clintonistas, and ultimately rubberstamped by the Republicans in Congress,and so everyone could get behind it. Some libertarians wavered,including Randians and other proponents of violent national secularism,and much of the radical left went limp too.

The Oklahoma City incident two years later was spun by the media as an example of anti-government extremism somehow being a greater threat than the government itself. It became increasingly un-PC to bring up what had happened in Texas. The election of Dubya and 9/11 washed away the paranoid anti-statist instincts of much of the Clinton-hating right.

Waco,from the raid’s planning to the cover-up and show trials,taught the U.S. government what it could get away with –which is to say, practically anything. It can gas innocent children with internationally banned chemicals. It can hoist a federal flag atop a torched American home,claim victory,and see its public image improve. It can throw grenades at people trying to escape a building and claim they are being held hostage. In the name of protecting these "hostages" and children,it can watch as they burn and keep the firefighters away. And the massacre will be tolerated,even applauded.

Dozens of people of color died at the hands of the federal government,and the official Civil Rights movement hardly spoke up. Dozens of people were targeted for their religion, and it hardly bothered many of the very conservatives who allege a war on religion waged by DC. The largest federal-military killing of civilians on U.S. soil in a century has now become one more notch on the progressive left’s timeline of major events in anti-government extremism,as opposed to a principal example of government extremism where a tiny minority community was virtually exterminated.

Indeed,in 1993 the Davidians were only the most conspicuous and recent example in America’s long history of the demonized Other,the marginalized underclass in the official hierarchy of human worth. Slaves,Indians,Mexicans, Southerners,Catholics,Irish and German-Americans,Chinese immigrants,Japanese-Americans, Mormons,homosexuals,alleged Communists,rightwing extremists, and many others have played the role,often for their imagined association with the wartime enemy,but always for being out of step with the government’s accepted definition of legitimate humanity. Many look back at incidents of intolerance with disbelief that Americans could be so blind to oppression. Yet when the topic of Waco comes up,they will think only of those nutcases who, according to the government and media,attacked federal agents and then killed themselves.

In the nineteen years since Waco,we have seen the police state explode in every direction and now we are all ensnared. Some groups are always more threatened than others,but no one is truly safe. The prisons have swollen to the largest detention system since Stalin’s gulags. The police conduct three thousand SWAT raids a month. The war on terror has made a total mockery of what remained of the Fourth Amendment. Torture has lost its taboo. So has indefinite detention. The feds irradiate and molest airline passengers by the millions. People are jailed for taking medicine,buying Sudafed,sharing songs,and selling milk. The Kafkaesque regulatory state threatens people of all economic classes with crushing fines and a fate in a cage. The public schools, always authoritarian institutions, have become explicit adjuncts of the criminal justice system and military recruitment offices. Every major police department has tanks and battle rifles and drones are being used for surveillance and God knows what else. Each federal department has enough firepower to conquer a small third-world country. DHS alone has ordered enough ammo to shoot every American man,woman,and child. The president claims the right to kill American citizens anywhere on the planet on his say-so alone. And he exercises that power.

Why do some of us continue to fixate on Waco?If for no other reason,because April 19,1993 was a squandered opportunity if ever there was one. The people could have risen up and said,"Enough!" They could have demanded the military occupation retreat from their own neighborhoods –both the federal presence and its satellite jackboots in the city police. They could have demanded an end to the gun laws,drug war,and federal war on crime,each of which was instrumental in ending the lives of more than twenty children at Waco. They could have turned against the media whose elites stood and applauded the White House as it announced and defended its latest killing spree. They could have seen the federal government for the clear and present danger it obviously poses –the only government that had militarily mass murdered American civilians on American soil since the collateral damage at Pearl Harbor. They could have turned their backs on the killers in DC,refusing ever to believe in their lies again,saving the lives of uncountable Americans, Serbians,Afghans,Iraqis,Libyans, Yemenis,Palestinians,and so many others who would bear the wrath of an unhampered imperial executive in the nineteen years to come, sparing the priceless liberties we have seen shredded on the altar of state power.

Instead,they looked the other way, they yawned,even cheered. There might still be time to turn things around. But the tanks are closing in.

April 19,2012

Anthony Gregory [send him mail] is research editor at the Independent Institute. He lives in Oakland, California. See his webpage for more articles and personal information.

Copyright © 2012 by LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
 

Brisco

Expert Expediter
And...to read more DRIVEL from this Drivelist.....

Click Here:AnthonyGregoryindex

Got better things to do myself............

Oh Yeah...I was down there in Waco during all this. Have a full photo album of it all too. Can't believe it's been 19 years though!!! Still feels like Yesterday hearing David Koresh and his Henchmen running through that building shooting all those people as they were setting fires to that complex.
 
Last edited:

AMonger

Veteran Expediter
And...to read more DRIVEL from this Drivelist.....

Click Here:AnthonyGregoryindex

Got better things to do myself............

Oh Yeah...I was down there in Waco during all this. Have a full photo album of it all too. Can't believe it's been 19 years though!!! Still feels like Yesterday hearing David Koresh and his Henchmen running through that building shooting all those people as they were setting fires to that complex.

Rhymes with bull spit. At least give lies the ring of truth.
 

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
Monger,

Prepare yourself: the statist bootlickers are now surely due to arrive in force ....
 

Brisco

Expert Expediter
Rhymes with bull spit. At least give lies the ring of truth.

Read It...Learn It....Accept It.

Waco siege - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fires WERE started by Branch Davidians.....Flat Out Proven.

Autopsy records indicate that at least 20 Davidians were shot, including five children under the age of 14. Three-year-old Dayland Gent was stabbed in the chest. The medical examiner who performed the autopsies believed these deaths were mercy killings by Davidians trapped in the fire with no escape.

You think it's BS that I was there, or that The Davidians not only started the Fires themselves as well as shooting their own kind?

I had gone back and forth down to Waco during that whole standoff. Have a Good Friend that just retired from the TX DPS. Back then he was stationed in Austin but was up in Waco on assignment during this stand-off. I was standing outside a Command Vehicle about a Football Field and 1/2 away from the Compound itself the morning the decision to end the stand-off was made. I was out there when the Davidians started Shooting their weapons not only at the Armored Vehicle trying to clear the scene, but also at other vehicles nearby. I was there when no one was firing outside the windows at all, but yet gunfire was going off well inside the building itself. And, LONG before their Little "Armory" was hit by fire making it sound like the 4th of July. I "Heard" those "Murders" 19 years ago today........whether you think it's bullspit or not.

And Yes....I have an Album somewhere in Storage that is packed with the old "KodaChrome" type of pictures in it that covered every trip I made down there, including the "Fire" that day. Remember, this was well before the days of everyone walking around with Video Cameras.
 

aristotle

Veteran Expediter
It was apparent by the second paragraph this article would most likely have some connection to Ron Paul's camp.... LewRockwell.com says it all.
 

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
Be prepared!! The doom and gloomer crowd, ie; our govenment is always wrong crowd, you know who I mean, will be out in full force.
The government is not always wrong .... however it is highly prone to being abused and corrupted by those with ill motivations and less than sterling character .... (IOW: most, if not all, men)
 
Last edited:

EASYTRADER

Expert Expediter
There was a video that was released, that showed the armored vehical, punching a hole in the wall to inject the CS gas. Its clear from the video, that the fire started in conjuction with the CS gas injection. At the time the Feds blamed a kerosene lantern for igniting the propellant in the CS causing the fire. So I don't give a **** what you read on wikipedia or witenessed from a mile away, that episode was at best negligant homicide on the part of the ATF, or worse out right revenge murder.

Don't forget ATF has a record of thuggery, from murdering Randy Weavers wife while sh was breast feeding a baby, to running guns to the sinaloa drug cartel resulting in the near overthrow of the mexican gov ernemt and 40k murders in Juarez alone.

BTW Randy Weaver, was awarded 13 mil by a jury in his wrongful death suit. As far as the waco wackos shooting at the tank, no ****, self defense.

Sent from my SPH-D700 using EO Forums
 

EASYTRADER

Expert Expediter
Well aparently the genius who posted the wikipedia link to prove the governemnts innocence in the waco fiasco didn't actually read the article, I just did its even worse than I thought, from BS'ing a judge to obtain a search warrant, and creating false "meth lab" evidence to justify the early morning no "knock" raid, oh well the country is lost anyway.
 

AMonger

Veteran Expediter
Well aparently the genius who posted the wikipedia link to prove the governemnts innocence in the waco fiasco didn't actually read the article, I just did its even worse than I thought, from BS'ing a judge to obtain a search warrant, and creating false "meth lab" evidence to justify the early morning no "knock" raid, oh well the country is lost anyway.

Not only that, but even with the falsehoods, by that I mean even if it wasn't a pack of lies, the warrant didn't establish enough probable cause to knock on the Davidians' door. That's not me saying that, that's veteran lawman (from back when lawmen were honorable men) and freedom advocate Jack McLamb.

And the article reminded me of the metal door that would show the direction of rounds that would show who fired first. You know, the door that mysteriously disappeared.

Let's not forget, when wikipedia deals with a controversial issue, they lock the page and only certain editors can change it, so one point of view is locked in place--that of that page's editor.

We won't have any more of these controversies now, I guess. Now they'll just send in the drones.
 
Last edited:

AMonger

Veteran Expediter
It was apparent by the second paragraph this article would most likely have some connection to Ron Paul's camp.... LewRockwell.com says it all.

Indeed it does. America isn't accustomed to anything other than lapdog media, not since the Reagan administration, anyway.
 

RLENT

Veteran Expediter
Good call - for anyone interested in more of his articles go to Anthony Gregory: Archives courtesy of LewRockwell.com
Hey Pil - let's just go for broke - here's Anthony Gregory's page at the Independent Institute, where he is a Research Editor:

Anthony Gregory: The Independent Institute

And just what is this "Independent Institute" of which we speak ?

Some nefarious anti-American cabal out to destroy the Empire ?

Let's see what some folks have said about it:

“The Independent Institute has a well-deserved reputation for rigorous analysis of critical public policy issues and for pointing the way toward reform in government. . . . I am happy to commend you for the clarity of your insights, not least those into the nature and blessings of economic freedom.”
RONALD REAGAN, 40th President of the United States

And immediately below that entry we find this:

“In spite of the pessimism that tends to exist for those of us who believe in true liberty and are associated with the government actually I’ve come away after this past year and a half or so as being a lot more optimistic because of groups like the Independent Institute. They’ve been around, they’re quiet but they get information out and they’re teaching, and this is what changes things. . . . I think what we need to do is present the truth and that is why what is being done has just been great because it will make the people question, they’re questioning the government and they need to question our history, and all of this stuff we get from our public school system has just so misled us so we really have an opportunity now for people who are opening their eyes. . . .What is coming though and why the work that we do and the work that the Independent Institute does is so critical right now is because we are in the midst of a major change in attitudes in this country. It’s been happening and I think because in the last 20 years we’ve made great progress.”
RON PAUL, U.S. Congressman, 14th Congressional District of Texas; former (actually current) candidate for President of the United States


And further down:

“You have developed a unique and effective program to influence policy debate and public opinion. Your focus on producing uncompromising scholarly critiques of government policies is absolutely critical to making significant legal, deregulatory, and privatization reforms possible. . . . I want to particularly commend your innovative and successful media and marketing promotional program, which reaches both the policy world and the public at large. . . . Those of us who have waged the battle for limited government on both the state and federal level know only too well how crucial this work can be. . . . The work of the Independent Institute is making an important contribution to our future success and deserves the support of all those interested in securing and preserving freedom at home and abroad.”
EDWIN W. MEESE, III, former Attorney General of the United States
 

EASYTRADER

Expert Expediter
I do have to take umbrage with the article on at least one point, maybe 2. The american revolution began in Massachusetts, a "Free" colony. It is true that Virginia supplied much of the Military and Political leadership but they were dragged into to revolution as a matter of practical politics. The two main drivers or personalities behind the revolution were abolitionists, John Adams and Benjamin Franklin.

As for George Washington being a horrible slave owner, that's only partially true, 270 of the slaves at Mt. Vernon were the property of his wife, the 30 that he owned personally were mostly bought as "Favors" to the other slaves, thy were wives and friends from other plantations, Washington didn't break up families as a matter of principle. "Billie Lee" , George Washingtons slave valet, was offered his freedom during the war and refused publicly. All of Washingtons slaves were freed on his death as were Marthas, and thos who choose to stay at Mt Vernon were allowed.

Having said that, slavery was evil then and it is evil today. But the idea of Americans being free started in the Northern Colonies where all Amricans were really free even the black ones. In order to defeat England the slave holding colonies had to be brought into the nation.

If the Founding Generation were alive today they'd all be in prison, except Hamilton, who would either be Fed Charman, or SecDef.
 
Last edited:
Top