True scum at it worst

[cheri1122]

Your thread title pretty much describes the use of such attention getting headlines by the media that exists to inform, but has morphed into a business that puts profit above principles.
How can anyone continue to feel outraged after reading the article? Is reading comprehension that poorly developed, or scarcely used?
The opinions expressed by the psychiatrists of the fringe group B4UACT are not shared by the rest of their peers, so how does that equate to 'society poised to accept' pedophilia?
Our society will not accept the abuse of children as anyone's 'right', no matter what rights belong to consenting adults - that is a line that cannot be crossed, period. Like the line that forbids killing someone just because you feel like it, it is an 'eternal truth' that doesn't change with new discoveries [there is a LOT that is yet to be learned about the human brain] or the times we live in.
Pedophilia is NOT related to homosexuality, despite the many efforts to portray the two as equivalent - a pedophile may be homo or hetero sexually oriented, same as the rest of us. And they need to be kept from harming children, whatever it takes.
When the author casually states that homosexuality is a 'lifestyle choice', his agenda is clear. He can cling to his cherished beliefs for as long as he likes, but scientists [particularly neurobiologists] are adding more and more evidence to prove that homosexuality is not a choice.
I wish the concern actually were for protecting children [because pedophiles don't respond to any known treatments], but it looks like the intent is to whip up some outrage to reinforce the author's chosen beliefs.

 

[Pilgrim]

Sorry Turkey day dude, if this was a main stay of the Obama administration as you suggest, then we would have already seen a move to include pedophiles and sexual deviants included in what is considered a class used to fight discrimination - we have not.

That's not what I suggested. My point was that these liberals in academia and the APA will be able to more easily promote their "anything goes" agenda while Obama and his liberal administration is in place to provide a more accomodating environment. They might not endorse this nonsense, but they would be more likely to just turn a blind eye toward these efforts. No politician in his right mind would even remotely appear to accept pedophilia as a normal condition. But the Obama administration with it's abundance of influential czars and their unfettered regulatory power could certainly accomodate these people behind the scenes.

Since I'm obviously having trouble communicating my thoughts on this subject, here's another quote with the complete article linked that might help clarify the issue:

Academic articles in scholarly journals have been presenting pedophilia in a sympathetic light for years, and, as Matthew Cullinan Hoffman noted, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) released a report in 1998 “claiming that the ‘negative potential’ of adult sex with children was ‘overstated’ and that ‘the vast majority of both men and women reported no negative sexual effects from their child sexual abuse experiences.’ It even claimed that large numbers of the victims reported that their experiences were ‘positive,’ and suggested that the phrase ‘child sex abuse’ be replaced with ‘adult-child sex.’” Others have coined the more disgusting term “intergenerational intimacy.”
The APA’s report was so disturbing that it drew an official rebuke from Congress, yet the pro-pedophile (or, pro-pederast) push continues. In fact, some psychiatric leaders, like Dr. Richard Green, who were instrumental in removing homosexuality from the APA’s list of mental disorders in 1973, have been fighting to remove pedophilia as well.

Why Are We Surprised With the Push for 'Pedophile Rights' - Michael Brown - Townhall Conservative

 

[layoutshooter]

As I understand it there is a move to change some "guideline" the DMN or something, I only caught part of it, that would move to not "criminalize" "minor attracted people" as some are now calling pedephiles. I wish I had caught the entire thing so I could find the reference. I was scrolling through the channels and caught the end of something on "Dr. Radio". From NYU Medical center. Not one of the "political" things.

 

[Pilgrim]

Inteligencia, Hillsdale College, boy does this explain a lot. Just like Rush, just a bunch of fake outrage.

Here's a good example of your "fake outrage":
Massive pedophile ring busted; 230 kids saved - US news - Crime & courts - msnbc.com

 

[witness23]

Here's a good example of your "fake outrage":
Massive pedophile ring busted; 230 kids saved - US news - Crime & courts - msnbc.com

What exactly does that have to do with your thread, you know, the one you started?

Are you accusing MSNBC of fake outrage on a story about a pedophile ring being busted?

 

[tbubster]

What exactly does that have to do with your thread, you know, the one you started?

Are you accusing MSNBC of fake outrage on a story about a pedophile ring being busted?

I STARTED THE THREAD,COME ON YOU CAN ATLEAST GET THAT RIGHT

 

[tbubster]

Fake outrage none the less.

No fake outrage here.

Del. pediatrician gets life for abusing patients - Yahoo! News


The fact that someone who has helped shape the views on important issues in the past now says that we are mistaken and that the pediatrician in the link is just misunderstood is not fake outrage.

20 -30 years ago it was to come out and support gays or gay marriage was political suicide,now it is in some ares of the country political suicide not to.

 

[layoutshooter]

Just what in the heck are "gay rights" anyway? Are gay people entitled to the same rights as straights? Guess it's sort of like "women's rights".

ONE of the big "gay right" things is "gay marriage" Straight people have no RIGHT to marry and it is ILLEGAL for certain straight people to marry.

This is a direct result of the Federal Government messing with States rights where they have NO business. Marriage is a STATE, not, Federal issue. As is most other stuff the Feds have been regulating this days. Like Health Care.

 

[RLENT]

Harvard Huh? Wasn't that the college that Obumma attended?

.... ahhh, FWIW .... Bush went there too ...

 

[BillChaffey]

I'm still trying to get past the second post, "you can't marry your dog or cat" What about a Mule or horse?.

 

[tbubster]

maybe this guy is just a poor misunderstood sicko


El Segundo Sexual Predator: Man Suspected of Exposing Self While Watching Toddler in Kiddie Pool Arrested - ktla.com

 

[layoutshooter]

He will be given benefits under the "American's With Disabilities" act. It is not his fault that he is "minor attracted" and he is FORCED to act on feelings. What a crock.

 

[Tennesseahawk]

He will be given benefits under the "American's With Disabilities" act. It is not his fault that he is "minor attracted" and he is FORCED to act on feelings. What a crock.

I'll be forced to act on feelings as well, if I ever run into someone like that. I'll sever his tallywhacker, and shove it up his nose, for the world to see.

 

[layoutshooter]

I'll be forced to act on feelings as well, if I ever run into someone like that. I'll sever his tallywhacker, and shove it up his nose, for the world to see.

You got that right. Leg me catch someone near a kid acting like that. There will be NO need for a trail.

 

[Poorboy]

.... ahhh, FWIW .... Bush went there too ...

Yup and I'm sure a whole lot of others did/do as well But I was just asking about Obumma because I wasn't sure

 

[RLENT]

Yup and I'm sure a whole lot of others did/do as well

Precisely.

But I was just asking about Obumma because I wasn't sure

Personally, I'd say if one wants to lie to and delude themselves as to their true motivations, that's quite alright with me ..... however I wish such folks would please spare me and others reading here such infantile shennanigans.

Such questions are usually asked for a very specific reason - and in most instances, I rather doubt that it was simply when someone saw the word "Harvard" ..... the question "I wonder what institution of higher learning Obama attended ?" immediately popped into their minds.

Leaving aside for the moment the rather unnatural obsession it would indicate if that were actually the case, generally such questions are asked in an effort to tie or tar someone to the matter being discussed ....

At best, such efforts are utterly devoid of any logic or sound reasoning whatsoever ..... and at worst they are simply juvenile.

Either way, it's a not a particularly great reflection on someone that would do it.

 

[Poorboy]

Precisely.


Personally, I'd say if one wants to lie to and delude themselves as to their true motivations, that's quite alright with me ..... however I wish such folks would please spare me and others reading here such infantile shennanigans.

Such questions are usually asked for a very specific reason - and in most instances, I rather doubt that it was simply when someone saw the word "Harvard" ..... the question "I wonder what institution of higher learning Obama attended ?" immediately popped into their minds.

Leaving aside for the moment the rather unnatural obsession it would indicate if that were actually the case, generally such questions are asked in an effort to tie or tar someone to the matter being discussed ....

At best, such efforts are utterly devoid of any logic or sound reasoning whatsoever ..... and at worst they are simply juvenile.

Either way, it's a not a particularly great reflection on someone that would do it.

Well I really don't give a fat babies butt what you think! How or why I ask my questions is really none of your business.I told you why I asked the question (Not that it was any of your business) I asked a question and you with all your uinfinite wisdom chose to make it infantile Well you go right ahead and ramble on because like i said before, I don't care I asked a question and if you don't like it then that's just too bad....I do believe that these forums are and can be used for asking questions----Right? But not according to you, you seem to blow it all out of proportion-----Again

 

[RLENT]

Well I really don't give a fat babies butt what you think!

Well ..... what about two fat babies butts ?

 

[Turtle]

I do believe that these forums are and can be used for asking questions----Right? But not according to you, you seem to blow it all out of proportion-----Again

Ask a question or make a comment in a public forum, and you are making it everyone's business by de facto soliciting their comments. Sometimes the question or comment is stupid, sometimes not, sometimes the responses are stupid, sometimes not. But in all cases, each is worth exactly one fat baby butt.

 

[Poorboy]

Well ..... what about two fat babies butts ?

Welllllll, Ok I'll give on the two fat babies butts instead of just one