paullud
Veteran Expediter
Paul's logic was that a driver represents profit to the carrier, and mine is that they can also represent a loss. If recruiters get credit for one, shouldn't they be held responsible for the other?
Just askin....I don't know what's involved, really, it just seems the reasonable way to look at it.
You can count that as negative revenue but the profit will still be much more, unless the company is going under. I would venture a guess that if a recruiter was costing a company money with the drivers they brought in it wouldn't be long before they were applying for a driving job. I'm not saying one job is more important than the other, but just from a revenue standpoint the recruiter is more valuable to a company.
Sent from my SCH-I535 using EO Forums mobile app