I agree! FedEx should not be worrying about "market rate"... They should be setting a standard that puts us above it. But the move to more general freight to increase profits is driving that standard down. At least that is how I see things from an E Surface unit perspective. Not sure about other unit sizes. And the last sentence upsets me- "We also understand that you will continue to make decisions that are best for your business, and we respect that as part of the contractor relationship." If that's the case they need to remove the acceptance rate from the equation. If you sit for days on end declining loads then you should be passed up because maybe this isn't the right company for your needs. But if you decline loads but still are taking a load everyday like we do it should not have any weight. Last thought- be more open with Owners about where the rates are- 3 yrs of experience tells me $2 a mile all miles was about average. Now it's down to $1.70 or lower with no explanation until now. Keep us in the loop so we have the information to make the right business decisions.
Personally I am glad the fleet bulletin did NOT say " We will be going to flat rate on such and such a date".
There is only so long that a company can pay more then they make or a bigger percentage then they anticipated when working on a budget.
I'm sorry,I do not believe FedEx moves much cheap freight,call them up and ask how much they want to move 2000 lbs. 600 miles.
I agree on counter offering a reasonable rate, not every run is a home run regarding DH and delivery location. I'm assuming surface freight trucks are holding out for WG rates, or some people are countering pie in the sky rates. Be reasonable. I'd like to see a frank and open discussion between the carrier and drivers on this topic.[/QUOTE
There are lots of folks, across all facets of FDCC that believe every load should be home run. Conversely, there are customers who pay WG rates, and a raggedy truck shows up with a slob for a driver, that I'm sure doesn't exactly inspire confidence in a shipper' view, because no WG truck was available or willing to run as cheaply as the run was offered at (or an acceptable variance)above.
Counting on drivers exclusively to "help them know what the market is" is just plain wrong, specifically for the reasons CM and I both pointed out above. Too many folks out there perverting the system for their own reasons that have little bearing on the market.
In the immortal words of Dave Wilson "It doesn't matter who's inconvienanced as long as it's the drivers". Feel free to use that phrase whenever it fits. Going to make some T shirts with it soon.