No, I am not in any way affiliated with Swift, in any way, shape or form, so you can put that conspiracy theory to rest. My issue is with those who make such broad, sweeping statements about a program, based on regurgitated news from 3 years ago. 3 years is an eternity in this industry. That being said, I read those stories back when they were actually newsworthy. I don't need to read them again.
With all due respect, you're the only one who's getting all defensive with the sophomoric name calling after your assertion was challenged.
Wait a cotton picking minute - you said 'adjectives = name calling', so who used such charged adjectives as 'utopian', 'ranting & raving', etc?
You're entitled to your opinion but when you state it as fact which you did, whether you know it or not, you set yourself up for rebuttal.
Check out post 51, in which you stated that Swift does not have the worst training program - sounds pretty unequivocal to me....also the comment "to assume they're the worst is to assume they're the only one cutting corners" [which is unequivocally FALSE, BTW].
I don't read any arrogance in Paullud's posts, but if you do, then pot, meet kettle - the arrogance and condescension fairly drip from comments such as "the cold hard truth is that companies are in business to make a profit, not to be charitable", "there is no utopian training program", and more that I won't bother retyping.
Swift may or may not be the 'worst', but the many indications that they could and should be better are hardly the 'tired old arguments' you describe - they're a red flag to everyone who shares the road with the maybe/maybe not competent rookies.
Posted with my Droid EO Forum App