Re: Those of you that have 05-06 engines. What are your plans for California next yea
As a fleet owner, we are working it from a couple different angles because half of our fleet meets the requirements and the other half doesn't. While watching the implementation and flying lawsuits, we will utilize the 1000 mile exemption and apply a differential program for the trucks that would be affected by having a limitation of entry beyond the 1000 miles.
If a truck can't go, that doesn't mean no revenue, but it may or may not be less? We will use current and prior year numbers to arrive at that contractors variance.
The purpose of that is to ensure there is no financial impact on the contractors part if their vehicle can't enter. This is more cost effective than doing something stupid like paying 16k for a retrofit than will prematurely damage the engine. What dealer is working on a truck with a retrofit on it outside of California? Imagine the screw ups with that kind of foolishness?
As trucks get replaced, the variance would go away with the new truck purchase. Seems like the right way to address "saving a tree".
I would rather give money to my teams long before I spend a cent that is for the benefit of California.
As a fleet owner, we are working it from a couple different angles because half of our fleet meets the requirements and the other half doesn't. While watching the implementation and flying lawsuits, we will utilize the 1000 mile exemption and apply a differential program for the trucks that would be affected by having a limitation of entry beyond the 1000 miles.
If a truck can't go, that doesn't mean no revenue, but it may or may not be less? We will use current and prior year numbers to arrive at that contractors variance.
The purpose of that is to ensure there is no financial impact on the contractors part if their vehicle can't enter. This is more cost effective than doing something stupid like paying 16k for a retrofit than will prematurely damage the engine. What dealer is working on a truck with a retrofit on it outside of California? Imagine the screw ups with that kind of foolishness?
As trucks get replaced, the variance would go away with the new truck purchase. Seems like the right way to address "saving a tree".
I would rather give money to my teams long before I spend a cent that is for the benefit of California.
Last edited: