Why do you think that?More than likely right before midterms elections they will say something.
Why do you think that?More than likely right before midterms elections they will say something.
Because this looks to much like a political ploy to sway the public.....but its pissing Republicans off to a point that it will hurt the Democrats even more now for midterms....you have Democrats almost dancing in the streets thinking trump is going to be charged with a federal crime.Why do you think that?
This has come up several times in recent days as the Mar-a-Lago search is discussed in the media. I'm not as willing as you to declare the matter closed. If charges are filed, I think the question will be formally raised in court and be answered there. It's a legitimate question, but not a settled one in my view.The President doesn't have to offer any evidence of declassification to anyone. He doesn't answer to anyone on that, since the President is the ultimate authority on what can be declassified, when, and how.
It turned out to be otherwise. Full copies were given to and signed for by a Trump attorney on the property before the FBI left around 6pm that evening.Just to clarify, for federal warrants, the law mandates that a copy of the warrant and a receipt of all items taken during the search be left with the owner of the premises or subject of the search. However, if the warrant and affidavit have been sealed by the judge, as in the case of Mar-a-Lago, you almost certainly don't get a copy. You have to file a motion to unseal and have it granted by the judge to get a copy.
Trump might have a copy, and if it were a home of a Democrat they'd probably have a copy, but considering the the way the FBI has treated Trump since he announced he was running for election, it would be too easy to say, "Well, it's been sealed by the judge, so we can't give you a copy."
You and I have different views of this DOJ investigation. I do not see it as "a political ploy." I see it as a legitimate investigation that was initiated months ago when the National Archives referred the matter to DOJ.Because this looks to much like a political ploy to sway the public.....but its pissing Republicans off to a point that it will hurt the Democrats even more now for midterms....you have Democrats almost dancing in the streets thinking trump is going to be charged with a federal crime.
Those three crimes could have and should have applied to Hillary Clinton.The warrant lists three crimes. Namely, violations of :
- 18 U.S.C. §§ 793: Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information, which carries a penalty of up to 10 years in prison.
- 18 U.S.C. §§ 2071: Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally, which carries a penalty of up to three years in prison and disqualification from holding office (more on this below).
- 18 U.S.C. §§ 1519: Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in Federal investigations and bankruptcy, which carries a penalty of up to 20 years in prison.
Interesting info. If Trump is charged with a crime or crimes regarding classified documents, it will fall to him to prove he actually had such a declassification order in place.New twist in FBI raid: Trump had 'standing order' to declassify documents taken to residence
Former president's office describe previously undeclared process that led to sensitive documents landing in Mar-O-Lago.justthenews.com
A lot more than 3 rooms were searched. Mar-a-Lago is a big place. To me, the remarkable thing is not a team of 30+ agents, technicians and attorneys were sent in to do the search. The remarkable thing is they were in and out in 9 hours.Hmmm 30 agents to search 3 rooms in 9 hours.
Something like that, yes. Notwithstanding the Trump attorney's claims, the DOJ obviously concluded the cooperation was not as the attorney claims. Thus the search. The materials revealed in the property receipt after the search suggest Trump and/or his staff were less than cooperative. The lawyer says one thing. The 20 boxes of material and the itemized list say something else.Lawyer says they were fully cooperating. Then gap for a couple weeks where they heard nothing and then raid.
That assumes such a plan is in place and I do not agree there is. But even if there was, it would not crash the whole thing. The classification question is but one of several questions raised by this investigation.If true it will crash and burn the whole plan to charge him and keep him out of running again.
I think the Mar-a-Lago search and fallout increases the likelihood Trump will run. While I don't think entering the race will protect him or somehow delay DOJ actions against him pursuant to the investigations they have underway, I do think Trump believes him becoming an announced candidate will somehow shield him from or delay DOJ actions against him that would otherwise come.If true it will crash and burn the whole plan to charge him and keep him out of running again.
Well, I guess we'll just have to wait and see whose view of the future is more clear.DeSantis won’t run if Trump does. Count on that. He should be Trump’s running mate though because I see him as the best choice. He won’t choose a non MAGA as VP.
When I heard about this whole "mole" theory I remembered a news report from several years ago about a law abiding citizen in DC whose home was raided on the pretext of a "tip". The Mar a Lago raid isn't about the size of the estate, it's about the police state that can persecute anyone for any perceived reason and prosecute them for any trivial violation they might find.Some have suggested an informant on the inside told DOJ in advance where to go and where to look. Without additional information, it is impossible to verify that. But the short time in and out to search such a large place lends credence to the informant idea.