If no one else is going to do it, I might have to Photoshop a Batman mask on this dog myself and call him The Bark Knight.
The Trump Card...
- Thread starter muttly
- Start date
Regarding the New York state case, on 11/4/19, "A three-judge panel of the 2nd Circuit Court Appeals unanimously ruled that the president is not immune from investigative steps taken by state prosecutors, such as a grand jury subpoena. Trump plans to go to the Supreme Court to try to block the disclosure, said Jay Sekulow, an attorney for the president said." (Source)
In other words, Trump lost this appeal. The next step is to see if the Supreme Court accepts the case.
"Obamacare covered preexisting conditions, but not preexisting physicians!" - Donald J. Trump.
With the House impeachment inquiry transcripts now being released to the public, it is an item of public record that Republican representatives were in the room and were able to directly question the witnesses. Suggestions previously made that they were shut out of the process seem inaccurate in light of the public record.
No one ever suggested that Republican members of the Intel Committee were shut out of the process and weren't allowed to question the witnesses. Well, the first couple of witnesses, Republican members of the committee weren't allowed to ask questions, and Schiff finally relented on subsequent witnesses, but those transcripts don't favor the Democrats and as such will not be released until they can be lost amongst the background noise of the more favorable transcripts.
Democrats luuuuv the popular vote.
Except on Monday nights.
The system is rigged: Sean Spicer advances on "Dancing With the Stars," thanks to Trump
Except on Monday nights.
The system is rigged: Sean Spicer advances on "Dancing With the Stars," thanks to Trump
My sister texted me. She said: "vote for Sean. Vote for Sean. Show those libs". I said I don't even watch that show, but ok. Voted maximum 10 times. So yeah, it's kind of rigged. Watched the show and I think he could dance better if he had his podium.Democrats luuuuv the popular vote.
Except on Monday nights.
The system is rigged: Sean Spicer advances on "Dancing With the Stars," thanks to Trump
Whistleblower attorney Mark Zaid: "When I Tweeted in January of 2015 a coup has begun, I didn't mean, uhm, er, what I meant was, uhm, I was just really good at predicting the future. I was talking about the legal processes. Yeah, a legal coup. I was talking about a legal coup! Yeah, that's the ticket! By the way, have you met my wife Morgan Fairchild? "
SMH
www.newsweek.com
President Trump Calls Public Impeachment Hearings 'A Hoax'
"They shouldn't be having public hearings. This is a hoax," the president told reporters on the White House's South Lawn. "This is just like the Russian witch hunt. This is just a continuation."
www.newsweek.com
The video you posted doesn't match the headline or the text beneath the video.SMH
President Trump Calls Public Impeachment Hearings 'A Hoax'
"They shouldn't be having public hearings. This is a hoax," the president told reporters on the White House's South Lawn. "This is just like the Russian witch hunt. This is just a continuation."
Trump called for open hearings, but that was before he found out that the "whistleblower" and his attorney are uber-active Democrat partisan activists who's mission is to impeach Trump. Once he found out that it was Hoax 2.0 - The Coup Bugaloo, he changed his views on the hearings. You can SMH, but you're probably SingMH at the wrong thing.
Meanwhile away from the swamp:
If Trump held a rally in a 100,000 seat stadium, Democrats would lose their minds. They're still mad at that night, a day or two before the election, when Trump had a rally with 35,000 people and at the same time in Cleveland Beyonce and Jay Z still wasn't enough to get 5000 people in for a Hillary rally.
Tragedy strikes outside the LSU-Alabama game on Saturday in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, when Baby Trump was viciously attacked and killed by an armed man, a Millennial, wielding a knife.
Baby Trump lived a brief, buy noteworthy life. We remember Baby Trump with fondness. He was part of our life. But sadly crime, violent crime, is just getting worse, and it just proves that the only way to stop a bad man with a knife is a good citizen with a knife. But there were no armed citizens to protect Baby Trump on that day. Those in charge of keeping Baby Trump safe were alas unarmed. Hopefully, someone with the skill and the powers can patch up Baby Trump and get him back in action once again. Take a moment of silence for Baby Trump. Say a prayer for Baby Trump, in the hopes that he will fly once again.
I do apologize for the graphic image, but I felt it as necessary to show the brutality of this heinous crime in the hopes that it will never happen again.
The book A Warning, written by an anonymous author, will soon be released. Excerpts have already been released.
While this may be good news for the author and publisher who will make money on book sales, it's sickening to me. Tell-all books about presidents and administrations are nothing new, but this book from an author who refuses to identify himself or herself is. With a named author, readers can judge the veracity of his or her content. This author provides no way for people to know he or she is in a position to know anything factual about Trump or the administration. We can't even verify if this person has even set foot in the White House.
I dislike it when the media reports things citing unnamed sources. There too, readers have no way to verify what is being reported. We are expected to trust the reporter and news organization's word that the "source" is reliable and is telling the truth. While it has always been part of the game in Washington for "sources" of all kinds to leak information of questionable reliability in an attempt to influence outcomes, the news cycle and the ongoing narrative, A Warning by an anonymous author carries this to an extreme.
The author, the publisher and the news organizations that give this book play are not enhancing our public debate. They are doing the country a grave disservice. The book should be ignored if not outright condemned.
While this may be good news for the author and publisher who will make money on book sales, it's sickening to me. Tell-all books about presidents and administrations are nothing new, but this book from an author who refuses to identify himself or herself is. With a named author, readers can judge the veracity of his or her content. This author provides no way for people to know he or she is in a position to know anything factual about Trump or the administration. We can't even verify if this person has even set foot in the White House.
I dislike it when the media reports things citing unnamed sources. There too, readers have no way to verify what is being reported. We are expected to trust the reporter and news organization's word that the "source" is reliable and is telling the truth. While it has always been part of the game in Washington for "sources" of all kinds to leak information of questionable reliability in an attempt to influence outcomes, the news cycle and the ongoing narrative, A Warning by an anonymous author carries this to an extreme.
The author, the publisher and the news organizations that give this book play are not enhancing our public debate. They are doing the country a grave disservice. The book should be ignored if not outright condemned.