Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door! The Statue of Liberty-Ellis Island Foundation, Inc.
Note the above was mounted on a plaque and installed on the Statue Of Liberty in 1903 in the middle of REPUBLICAN Teddy Roosevelt's term.
Emma Lazarus wrote poetry, not policy. Regardless of what someone thinks our nation’s immigration policy should be today, it shouldn’t be determined by a schmaltzy sonnet written for a different era. We live in a very different era of immigration now, and the sentimental sonnet offers a dangerously distorted picture of the relationship between newcomers and the new land. They are rarely the poorest of the poor because it takes some resources to migrate. The most afflicted, as Lazarus described them, are the folks who get left behind.
Most immigrants don't come here because they are tired, poor, wretched refuse, homeless, or tempest-tost. They come here because the times got tough so they got up and got going, or they are simply looking for the BBD (Bigger, Better Deal).
Even the phrase,
"huddled masses yearning to breathe free," distorts reality. Sure, lots of people have come to the United States for political reasons, including the ever-increasing number of people who have discovered the "I fear for my life" refugee status loophole, and that is an important component of our immigration history. But, most have come here because they saw an opportunity to improve their social and economic well-being, and many others (increasingly) have come just because they wanted to be with family who had already made the trip.
The fact is, for as long as the Statue of Liberty has stood in New York Harbor, the United States has had policies to block immigration by people considered too poor to make it on their own, or too sick or who are morally, politically or socially unfit. Of course most of those existing policies get stepped on with the lottery visa program, because none of those policies apply.
Immigration policies need to be, and largely had been historically, reinvented by every generation for the needs of that generation. Like any national endeavor that requires some tough decisions, with the management of immigration requiring public support based on self-interests, contemporary realities and articulable future goals, not to mention enduring values.
The time is rapidly approaching get to a reasonable and productive debate over immigration policy for a new generation. But however that comes to be, it is not going to happen by looking to Emma Lazarus for inspiration. It's a sentiment for a different era, one that no longer applies today.