Sure it is. I'll get back to that in a sec.
Read the transcript of the question by Harwood. He was asking if the high prices of gas would help us.
Help us in what way? The question asked by Hardwood was in response to Obama's statements that over the "long-term ... the only way we're going to deal with these high gas prices is if we change how we consume oil. And that means investing in alternative fuels, it means that we are raising fuel efficiency standards on cars, that we're helping the automakers retool. ... And when we look at other ways that we're using energy, we have to adapt renewable, clear energies like solar, wind and biodiesel."
Then Hardwood asked, "As difficult as this is for consumers right now, is, in fact, high gas prices
what we need to let the market work, a line incentive so that we
do shift to alternative means of energy?"
To which Obama replied, "Well, I think that we have been slow to move in a better direction when it comes to energy usage. And the president (Bush), frankly, hasn't had an energy policy. And as a consequence, we've been consuming energy as if it's infinite. We now know that our demand is badly outstripping supply with China and India growing as rapidly as they are. So...
To which Harwood interrupted and said,
"So could these high prices help us?"
Which is where Obama responded with, "I think that I would have preferred a gradual adjustment. The fact that this is such a shock to American pocketbooks is not a good thing."
Obama doesn't say he wants lower prices. He offers his own preference that the prices should increase gradually.
He offered his own preferences that they should increase gradually rather than rapidly.
He wasn't even asked to choose between gas prices rising fast or slow. Its like asking someone if they want to step on a nail and the person says I want to step on it slowly rather quickly. Both wrong answers. The right answer is No I don't want to step on a nail.
Well, no, he already answered that question with the first sentence of his initial question when he said, "What is true is that given the global price of oil right now, that we can't artificially lower gas prices. What we can do is provide people immediate relief through our tax code. ... When I'm president next year, what I'd like to do is pass a middle class tax cut, $1,000 per family per year to offset higher prices in gas, food, medical care."
Look, I get it, I understand the premise you want to establish, that being everything that is bad is because of Obama, and if Obama were a Republican that everything would be good, and that during a re-election year the president was wanting and actually saying that he wanted gas prices to go higher. Not only that, but you want to establish that Obama has control of gas prices to the point that he can get the price of gas to where he wants it, and that's why the price of gas is somewhere between above $3, despite the fact that he actually wants it to be somewhere between $5 and $10 a gallon (not sure the exact number you've committed to on that one, tho).
So my question to you is, if Obama has the kind of control over gas prices that you say he does, and he actually wants gas prices to be much higher than they are, which is no higher than they were under Bush, why hasn't he increased the price of gas to where he wants it to be?
That's rhetorical, because he doesn't have control of gas or oil prices. No president ever has, including the Bush Oil-Men Presidencies. Have you completely forgotten the Bush years, when the Oil President was blamed for every single uptick in pump prices, despite the fact that he had zero control over it? So if Obama wants oil prices to be really high, or really low, it doesn't matter either way, because he can't control it in either case.
Carter didn't cause the second Arab oil embargo, he scrambled to contain its effects. Clinton didn't cause Saudia Arabia to flood the market with oil in its attempt to regain discipline and control among OPEC members, although he benefited from it.
The last president to try to control prices was Nixon, and all he got was rationing and long lines at the pump.
If you go back
100 years and look at gas prices, adjusted for inflation of course, you find that the 100 year average price for gas under Republican presidents is $2.55, and under Democrat presidents it is $2.63, an whopping $.08 cent difference, which is statistically a dead heat, indicating that factors other than the presidency is in control of the price of gas and oil.