Every person, huh. And you know this how?Every person that works at CNN thinks they are all above the rules and they have no manners .......
Don't get too excited. It's just a 14-day TRO.
Yup. That's the concern.Like I'm gonna wet myself over some reporter getting into the White House ...
What is your dogs name? He or she is a keeper and most likely can do no wrong.....Every person that works at CNN thinks they are all above the rules and they have no manners ......... I would like to be the intern that kicks him in the change purse for touching me
Not really. Fox News doesn't claim to be nonpartisan, unbiased and neutral, whereas CNN does.FOX News is Fake News.
CNN is Fake News.
They’re two sides of the same coin.
Not really. Fox News doesn't claim to be nonpartisan, unbiased and neutral, whereas CNN does.
Fox News was invented to be a tool to push the Republican agenda, but that changed somewhat when Roger Ailes was ousted and then died, and there was a dramatic shift in coverage bias when Trump won the nomination and Fox witnessed CNN and the MSM go full Libtard. Fox News backed off the propaganda and the cheerleadung while CNN and the MSM did the exact opposite.
The famous Harvard Kennedy School's Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy 2017 study showing CNN's coverage of Trump at 93% negative (MSM overall at 86%negative) and that of Fox News being 52% negative, clearly indicates which news outlets are more unbiased and neutral neutral.
After receiving harsh criticism for their non-journalistic journalism, an update to the study fee year after the first study showed the MSM overall dropped to just 80% negative coverage of Trump, while CNN's negative coverage plummeting to a measly 91% negative. Fox News dropped to 51%negative
Those aren't two sides of the same coin those are two different coins.
51% negative is, like, the worst cheerleading... ever.Of course Fox is going to be less negative about Trump. They’re his biggest cheerleaders as well as advisors.
You're living in the past, allowing it to prejudice and cloud your current view of reality Fact is, Fox dropped their "Fair and Balanced" slogan, not coincidentally, in August, 2016, right after Trump won the nomination and right after Roger Ailes left the network and died. When I say that Fox News underwent a dramatic change in coverage bias at the same time that CNN and the MSM went full Libtard propaganda tool, I'm not kidding.Another thing, they “never claimed to be nonpartisan” and yet they always claimed “fair and balanced”.
Please pick one or the other. Can’t have both.
Fox has a few cheerleaders. Hannity, Ingraham, Judge Jeanine, and a few others. At least a few non Trump fans as well.Not really. Fox News doesn't claim to be nonpartisan, unbiased and neutral, whereas CNN does.
Fox News was invented to be a tool to push the Republican agenda, but that changed somewhat when Roger Ailes was ousted and then died, and there was a dramatic shift in coverage bias when Trump won the nomination and Fox witnessed CNN and the MSM go full Libtard. Fox News backed off the propaganda and the cheerleadung while CNN and the MSM did the exact opposite.
The famous Harvard Kennedy School's Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy 2017 study showing CNN's coverage of Trump at 93% negative (MSM overall at 86%negative) and that of Fox News being 52% negative, clearly indicates which news outlets are more unbiased and neutral neutral.
After receiving harsh criticism for their non-journalistic journalism, an update to the study fee year after the first study showed the MSM overall dropped to just 80% negative coverage of Trump, while CNN's negative coverage plummeting to a measly 91% negative. Fox News dropped to 51%negative
Those aren't two sides of the same coin those are two different coins.
Of course Fox is going to be less negative about Trump. They’re his biggest cheerleaders as well as advisors.
Another thing, they “never claimed to be nonpartisan” and yet they always claimed “fair and balanced”.
Please pick one or the other. Can’t have both.
Sent from my iPhone using EO Forums
I will say that Acosta reflexively touched the intern to prevent her from taking the mic. Trump has even publicly said that it wasn't terrible It's just ridiculous, imo, that he won't even admit it happened and his news network covers for him totally and instead refers to a doctored video.He laid palm-wrist on her.
The difference is like dusk and dawn.
WHen the intern reached for the microphone, which is what she does for a living, Acosta should have just given it to her like every other reporter does. Instead, he jerked away from her like a small child. "Mine!!!" When she reached under to grab it (like an adult would do with a child), that's when he brushed her arm away, still in Child Mode. It wasn't incidental, like some people are claiming, it was most definitely on purpose. But it wasn't a karate chop or some kind of assault, either. It was an adult child acting childish.I will say that Acosta reflexively touched the intern to prevent her from taking the mic. Trump has even publicly said that it wasn't terrible It's just ridiculous, imo, that he won't even admit it happened and his news network covers for him totally and instead refers to a doctored video.He laid palm-wrist on her.
The difference is like dusk and dawn.